How to Track Competitor R&D Pipelines Through Drug Patent Filings

Copyright © DrugPatentWatch. Originally published at https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/

Patent filings represent one of the most valuable yet underutilized sources of competitive intelligence in the pharmaceutical industry. By systematically monitoring and analyzing these documents, companies can gain unprecedented insights into competitor research directions, technological innovations, and potential market entries years before products reach the market.

Drug patent intelligence provides a window into the R&D pipelines of competitors, enabling strategic decision-making that can fundamentally transform how pharmaceutical companies position themselves in the market. This comprehensive guide explores how organizations can leverage patent data to track competitor activities, identify emerging trends, and make data-driven decisions that drive competitive advantage in this high-stakes industry.

Understanding the Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape

Before diving into tracking methodologies, it’s essential to understand the foundation of pharmaceutical intellectual property protection and how these documents serve as intelligence sources for R&D activities.

Types of Pharmaceutical Patents

The pharmaceutical industry utilizes several distinct types of patents, each protecting different aspects of drug development and commercialization:

Composition patents protect the main active ingredients in a drug formulation, essentially covering the chemical structure or genetic sequences that make up the drug itself. These are often considered the most valuable patents in a pharmaceutical company’s portfolio3.

Usage/Method patents (also known as method-of-use patents) cover specific applications of compounds to treat particular diseases or conditions. These patents provide exclusivity for the drug’s therapeutic applications even when the compound itself might not be patentable3.

Formulation patents protect the way a drug is developed and administered, including dosage forms, delivery systems, and routes of administration. These patents can significantly extend market exclusivity beyond the original composition patent3.

Process patents cover the manufacturing methods used to produce pharmaceutical compounds. These are particularly important for complex biologics where the manufacturing process significantly impacts the final product3.

Combination patents protect the use of multiple active ingredients together in a single formulation. These patents are increasingly important as combination therapies become more prevalent across therapeutic areas3.

Understanding these patent types helps analysts recognize the strategic intent behind competitor filings and better interpret their R&D pipelines.

The Patent Lifecycle in Pharmaceuticals

The lifecycle of pharmaceutical patents follows a unique trajectory compared to other industries:

While standard patent terms last 20 years from filing, the effective market exclusivity for pharmaceutical products typically ranges between 7-12 years. This reduced exclusivity period results from the lengthy regulatory review processes that occur before market approval2.

Patent applications follow a predictable publication timeline, with most becoming public 18 months after filing. This predictability creates a valuable intelligence opportunity, as companies can systematically track new filings to understand competitor activities well before products reach the market.

“Companies that use patent data for trend forecasting are 2.3 times more likely to be market leaders in their respective fields.” – McKinsey & Company report5

Why Monitoring Competitor Patents Matters

Systematic patent intelligence gathering provides multiple strategic advantages that directly impact business outcomes in the pharmaceutical sector.

Strategic Advantages of Patent Intelligence

Patent monitoring serves as an early warning system for competitive threats. By identifying new patent filings in your therapeutic areas of interest, your organization can detect emerging competitive products years before they enter clinical trials or receive regulatory approval.

This intelligence allows companies to make informed decisions about their own R&D investments, potentially redirecting resources to more promising or less crowded therapeutic areas. It also facilitates more accurate forecasting of market dynamics and competitive landscapes.

Risk Mitigation Through Early Detection

Early awareness of competitor innovations enables proactive risk management strategies. Companies can:

  • Evaluate the potential impact of competitor innovations on existing product lines
  • Assess freedom-to-operate constraints for pipeline products
  • Identify patent challenges or invalidation opportunities
  • Develop contingency plans for market entry by competitive products

By anticipating these challenges rather than reacting to them, pharmaceutical companies can implement more effective defensive strategies and minimize business disruption.

Identifying Market Opportunities

Patent analytics isn’t just about tracking threats-it’s equally valuable for identifying opportunities:

  • Detecting gaps in patent coverage that represent potential areas for proprietary development
  • Identifying technologies that complement your existing platform capabilities
  • Discovering potential licensing or acquisition targets with promising innovations
  • Recognizing when competitors abandon specific research directions, potentially creating white space opportunities

These insights can fundamentally redirect R&D strategy toward higher-value opportunities with reduced competitive intensity.

Essential Tools for Patent Monitoring

Effective patent tracking requires access to comprehensive data sources and sophisticated analytical tools designed specifically for pharmaceutical intelligence gathering.

Patent Databases and Resources

Several specialized databases provide access to pharmaceutical patent information:

MedsPaL (Medicines Patent Pool database) offers free information on the intellectual property status of selected patented medicines. Originally focused on HIV, hepatitis C, and tuberculosis treatments, it expanded in 2017 to cover all patented medicines on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines and was further enhanced in 2024 to include COVID-19 vaccines4.

Derwent World Patents Index from Clarivate captures patent publications from 59 authorities worldwide, translating them into English, correcting errors, normalizing inventor and assignee data, and indexing records using 322 technology classes7.

These resources provide the foundational data necessary for comprehensive competitive intelligence gathering.

AI-Powered Patent Analytics Platforms

Modern patent tracking leverages artificial intelligence to transform raw patent data into actionable insights:

PatSight, an AI-driven pharmaceutical patent data mining platform, automates extraction of key data from patents. It can process up to 12 patents simultaneously, delivering results within an hour in editable formats like CSV or SDF files with SMILES notation6.

The platform features accurate chemical structure recognition, automated identification of structures, names, and biological activity data, multilingual patent support (English, Chinese, and Japanese), and comprehensive data management capabilities6.

Patent Analysis Software Options

Beyond specialized pharmaceutical platforms, several enterprise-level solutions provide robust patent analytics capabilities:

Clarivate Patent Intelligence Solutions help organizations evaluate patentability and freedom-to-operate with confidence, make informed R&D decisions, optimize patent portfolios, and unlock greater value from existing intellectual property7.

When selecting tools, organizations should consider factors like data coverage, analytical capabilities, integration with existing systems, user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness based on organizational needs.

Step-by-Step Process for Tracking Competitor R&D

Implementing an effective patent monitoring system requires a structured approach with clearly defined objectives and methodologies.

Setting Up Systematic Monitoring Systems

Establish a systematic patent surveillance program following these steps:

  1. Define monitoring objectives – Clarify what information you need to extract from patent data and how it will support business decisions
  2. Determine monitoring frequency – Most organizations conduct weekly or monthly reviews of new filings in their areas of interest
  3. Establish monitoring parameters – Create search strategies incorporating relevant keywords, classification codes, and competitor names
  4. Implement alert systems – Configure automated notifications when patents matching your criteria are published
  5. Develop documentation protocols – Create standardized approaches for recording and communicating findings

Automation is essential for sustainable monitoring programs, as manual tracking quickly becomes overwhelming given the volume of pharmaceutical patent filings.

Identifying Key Competitors to Track

Not all competitors warrant equal attention. Focus monitoring efforts on:

  • Direct competitors in your therapeutic areas
  • Companies with complementary or overlapping technology platforms
  • Emerging biotechnology companies with disruptive innovations
  • Academic institutions conducting foundational research in your field
  • Contract research organizations working with multiple competitors

Create a tiered monitoring system where primary competitors receive comprehensive coverage while secondary players undergo less intensive scrutiny.

Determining Critical Patent Parameters

Effective monitoring requires focusing on the most relevant patent information:

  • Patent claims that define the scope of protection
  • Chemical structures or biological sequences
  • Therapeutic applications and indications
  • Dosage forms and administration routes
  • Manufacturing processes and formulation details
  • Supporting experimental data demonstrating efficacy or advantages

Develop standardized approaches for extracting and analyzing each parameter to ensure consistent intelligence gathering.

Establishing Regular Review Protocols

Create structured processes for reviewing and acting on patent intelligence:

  1. Initial screening – Quickly assess relevance and priority of new patent publications
  2. Detailed analysis – Conduct thorough examination of high-priority documents
  3. Cross-functional review – Engage R&D, legal, and commercial teams in evaluating implications
  4. Strategic integration – Incorporate findings into business planning processes
  5. Follow-up monitoring – Track prosecution progress for key applications

Documented workflows ensure consistent execution regardless of personnel changes and facilitate knowledge transfer within the organization.

Extracting Valuable Intelligence from Patent Filings

The real value of patent monitoring comes from extracting meaningful insights from technical documents-transforming legal language into strategic intelligence.

Decoding Patent Claims and Scope

Patent claims define the legal boundaries of protection and require careful interpretation:

  • Analyze independent claims to understand the core innovation being protected
  • Examine dependent claims to identify potential future development directions
  • Assess claim breadth to evaluate the strength of competitive protection
  • Look for unusual claim structures that might indicate strategic filing approaches

Bear in mind that initial claims are typically broader than what ultimately gets granted, so tracking prosecution history provides additional insights into actual protection scope.

Analyzing Patent Filing Patterns

Patterns in filing activity often reveal strategic intent:

  • Geographical coverage – Extensive international filing suggests high commercial value
  • Filing velocity – Accelerated filing rates indicate strategic priority areas
  • Continuations and divisionals – Multiple related applications suggest platform technology development
  • Timing strategies – Synchronized filings across therapeutic areas may indicate portfolio-level protection strategies

These patterns help prioritize monitoring efforts toward competitor projects with the greatest strategic significance.

Connecting Patents to Pipeline Products

One of the most valuable outputs from patent monitoring is connecting abstract technical disclosures to potential pipeline products:

  1. Group related patents into “families” that protect different aspects of the same innovation
  2. Map patent families to therapeutic areas and mechanisms of action
  3. Compare patent disclosures with publicly announced pipeline programs
  4. Identify “stealth programs” with substantial patent activity but no public disclosure
  5. Estimate development timelines based on patent filing progression and experimental data

This mapping process provides visibility into competitor pipelines years before clinical trial initiation or public announcements.

Identifying Technology Trends

Aggregate analysis across multiple competitors reveals industry-wide technology trends:

  • Shifts in target selection within therapeutic areas
  • Emerging modalities gaining traction (e.g., from small molecules to biologics)
  • Evolving approaches to addressing specific mechanisms of action
  • Changing formulation and delivery technologies
  • New manufacturing processes being adopted

These trends help contextualize individual competitor activities within broader industry movements and identify potential disruptive innovations.

Translating Patent Data into Strategic Insights

Gathering patent information is only valuable when translated into actionable business intelligence that informs strategic decision-making.

Forecasting Competitor Product Launches

Patent data enables prediction of future product introductions:

  • Timing estimation – Patent filing patterns typically precede market entry by 5-10 years
  • Feature prediction – Claims and examples reveal likely product characteristics and advantages
  • Indication targeting – Method claims indicate therapeutic applications being pursued
  • Differentiation assessment – Comparative data in patents reveals positioning strategy

These forecasts allow organizations to prepare competitive responses or market positioning strategies well before competitor products reach the market.

Predicting Research Directions

Patent activity provides early signals of shifting research priorities:

  • New target classes appearing in competitor filings
  • Increasing investment in specific technological approaches
  • Abandonment of previously active research areas
  • Acquisition of external technologies through in-licensing

By recognizing these shifts early, companies can evaluate their own research alignments and potentially adjust directions to avoid crowded spaces or capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Mapping Competitor Technology Platforms

Comprehensive patent analysis reveals the foundational technology platforms underpinning competitor pipelines:

  • Core molecular scaffolds or biological platforms
  • Enabling technologies that span multiple products
  • Cross-therapeutic applications of similar approaches
  • Manufacturing or formulation technologies that create competitive advantages

This platform-level understanding provides deeper insights than product-by-product analysis, revealing longer-term competitive strategies.

Identifying White Space Opportunities

Gap analysis across the patent landscape identifies potential opportunities:

  • Therapeutic targets with limited patent coverage
  • Delivery approaches not yet claimed for specific indications
  • Combination opportunities with limited competitive activity
  • Novel applications of existing technologies with minimal protection

These white spaces represent potential development opportunities with reduced competitive intensity and stronger intellectual property positions.

Advanced Patent Analysis Techniques

Beyond basic monitoring, sophisticated analytical methodologies provide deeper strategic insights from patent data.

Constructing Patent Landscapes

Patent landscapes provide visual representations of competitive positioning:

  1. Identify relevant patent documents through comprehensive searching
  2. Classify documents by meaningful parameters (e.g., target, mechanism, company)
  3. Analyze relationships between patents using visualization tools
  4. Identify clusters of activity and areas with limited coverage
  5. Assess relative strengths of different competitors within the landscape

These visualizations make complex competitive relationships more accessible to decision-makers and highlight strategic considerations that might not be apparent from document-by-document analysis.

Citation Analysis Methodologies

Citation patterns reveal relationships between organizations and technologies:

  • Forward citations indicate the influence of specific innovations
  • Backward citations reveal the technological foundation of new developments
  • Self-citations suggest platform development within an organization
  • Citation relationships between competitors indicate technology transfer or influence

These citation networks help identify the most foundational patents in a field and track how innovations flow between organizations.

Semantic Analysis Approaches

Modern natural language processing techniques extract meaning from patent text:

  • Concept extraction identifies key technologies and approaches
  • Similarity analysis groups related patents regardless of terminology differences
  • Sentiment analysis detects emphasis on specific advantages or problems
  • Terminology evolution tracks how description of technologies changes over time

These techniques are particularly valuable for analyzing large patent portfolios where manual review would be impractical.

Combining Patent Data with Other Intelligence Sources

Patent intelligence becomes most powerful when integrated with other information sources:

  • Clinical trial registrations that confirm development progress
  • Scientific publications that provide mechanistic details
  • Regulatory submissions that indicate approval strategies
  • Business development activities that suggest strategic priorities
  • Conference presentations that reveal early-stage research

This integration creates a more comprehensive view of competitor activities across the development continuum from early research through commercialization.

Case Studies: Successful Pipeline Tracking

Real-world examples demonstrate how patent intelligence drives strategic advantage in pharmaceutical companies.

Case Study 1: Early Detection of Competitor Entry

A mid-sized pharmaceutical company with a market-leading oncology product established systematic monitoring of patents in their therapeutic area. Through this process, they identified a series of patent filings from a competitor that revealed a potentially superior approach to their target mechanism.

By identifying this threat three years before the competitor’s Phase I trial announcement, the company:

  • Accelerated their own next-generation program
  • Proactively adjusted marketing strategies to strengthen brand loyalty
  • Developed messaging to differentiate their product’s established safety profile
  • Explored combination approaches that could maintain their product’s relevance

This early intelligence allowed the company to maintain market share despite eventually facing competition with technically superior efficacy characteristics.

Case Study 2: Redirecting R&D Based on Patent Intelligence

A biotechnology company focused on autoimmune diseases conducted comprehensive patent landscape analysis before finalizing their lead program selection. The analysis revealed:

  • One therapeutic target had extensive patent coverage by three major competitors
  • A mechanistically related target had minimal patent activity despite promising biology
  • The competitor patents included substantial experimental data suggesting the challenges in the crowded area

Based on this intelligence, the company redirected development efforts toward the less crowded mechanism, where they secured broad patent protection and faced less competitive pressure during development.

Case Study 3: Strategic Partnership Opportunities

A pharmaceutical company used patent analysis to identify potential acquisition targets with complementary technology. Their process involved:

  1. Mapping all patents in their therapeutic area of interest
  2. Identifying smaller companies with strong patent positions in specific niches
  3. Analyzing citation patterns to find highly influential early-stage technologies
  4. Evaluating freedom-to-operate implications of different acquisition scenarios

This systematic approach led to the identification of a previously overlooked biotechnology company with foundational patents in a complementary technology area. The subsequent acquisition added significant value to the company’s pipeline at lower cost than better-known targets.

Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Patent monitoring systems face several implementation challenges that must be addressed for sustainable effectiveness.

Dealing with Information Overload

The sheer volume of pharmaceutical patent filings creates significant filtering challenges:

  • Implement tiered screening systems that apply strict relevance criteria for initial review
  • Develop clear priority frameworks to focus attention on strategically important documents
  • Leverage AI-based relevance scoring to automatically prioritize patent documents
  • Create standardized summary formats that capture essential information efficiently
  • Establish regular portfolio review sessions rather than document-by-document distribution

These approaches prevent analytical paralysis while ensuring critical competitive intelligence isn’t overlooked.

Interpreting International Patent Filings

Global pharmaceutical development requires monitoring patents across multiple jurisdictions:

  • Focus on key markets like US, Europe, Japan, and China for comprehensive coverage
  • Understand jurisdiction-specific filing strategies that might reveal market prioritization
  • Track Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications as early indicators before national phase entry
  • Recognize different examination standards that affect granted claim scope across countries
  • Consider utilizing specialized translation services for critical foreign-language documents

Developing expertise in international patent systems significantly enhances the quality of competitive intelligence derived from global filings.

Managing Patent Monitoring Costs

Patent intelligence can become resource-intensive without careful management:

  • Implement strict scope parameters that focus only on directly relevant therapeutic areas
  • Utilize tiered service approaches with detailed analysis reserved for high-priority documents
  • Consider outsourcing initial screening while maintaining internal expertise for strategic analysis
  • Leverage subscription-based tools rather than pay-per-view approaches for frequent monitoring
  • Develop clear ROI measures that demonstrate the value of patent intelligence to justify investment

With appropriate scope management, even smaller organizations can implement effective patent monitoring programs within reasonable budget constraints.

Building Internal Expertise

Extracting maximum value from patent monitoring requires specialized skills:

  • Develop cross-functional teams that combine scientific, legal, and business perspectives
  • Create training programs to build patent analysis capabilities across the organization
  • Establish relationships with external experts for specialized analytical needs
  • Implement knowledge management systems to retain insights despite personnel changes
  • Create mentorship opportunities to transfer expertise from experienced analysts to newcomers

This capability development ensures sustainable competitive advantage through patent intelligence over time.

The field of patent analytics continues to evolve rapidly, with several emerging trends transforming competitive intelligence capabilities.

AI and Machine Learning Applications

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing how patent data is processed and analyzed:

  • Automated extraction of chemical structures from patents with high accuracy
  • Natural language processing to identify relationships between patents beyond traditional classification
  • Predictive analytics to forecast competitor activities based on historical patterns
  • Automated relevance scoring that improves with user feedback
  • Deep learning approaches for identifying non-obvious connections between technologies

As noted by PatSight users, “AI-driven patent extraction tools can boost research” by automating data extraction and enabling researchers to focus on analysis rather than information gathering6.

Integration with Other Data Sources

The future of patent intelligence lies in seamless integration with broader data ecosystems:

  • Unified platforms combining patent, scientific literature, clinical trial, and regulatory data
  • Real-time linking of new information across multiple sources
  • Integrated visualization tools that present comprehensive competitive intelligence
  • Collaborative analysis environments enabling cross-functional interpretation
  • Automated updates to strategic planning documents based on new intelligence

This integration creates a more comprehensive and contextual understanding of competitor activities across the development continuum.

Real-time Monitoring Capabilities

Technology advances are enabling increasingly timely competitive intelligence:

  • Immediate notification of new publications in areas of interest
  • Rapid extraction of key information from newly published documents
  • Automated preliminary analysis highlighting critical competitive implications
  • Dynamic updating of competitive landscapes as new information emerges
  • Continuous reprioritization of monitoring focus based on emerging trends

These capabilities transform patent monitoring from a periodic review exercise to a continuous intelligence stream supporting agile decision-making.

Building a Competitive Intelligence Function

Creating sustainable value from patent tracking requires establishing robust organizational capabilities and processes.

Required Skill Sets

Effective patent intelligence teams combine multiple skill domains:

  • Scientific expertise in relevant therapeutic areas and technologies
  • Patent analysis skills including claim interpretation and prosecution understanding
  • Legal knowledge regarding intellectual property rights and limitations
  • Business acumen to translate technical findings into strategic implications
  • Data science capabilities for applying advanced analytics to patent information
  • Communication skills to convey complex insights to different stakeholders

Organizations typically develop these capabilities through a combination of specialized hiring, training programs, and external partnerships.

Cross-Functional Collaboration

Patent intelligence must be integrated across organizational functions:

  • R&D teams utilize insights to inform research direction and target selection
  • Legal departments leverage findings for freedom-to-operate assessments
  • Business development identifies licensing opportunities and partnership targets
  • Marketing gains competitive positioning insights and differentiation opportunities
  • Executive leadership incorporates intelligence into strategic planning processes

Establishing formal collaboration mechanisms ensures patent intelligence informs decisions across the organization rather than remaining isolated within technical teams.

Reporting and Communication Strategies

Effective communication transforms patent data into actionable intelligence:

  • Tiered reporting approaches with different detail levels for various audiences
  • Visualization techniques that make complex competitive landscapes accessible
  • Regular briefing sessions with key stakeholders to discuss implications
  • Scenario planning exercises based on patent intelligence findings
  • Integration with strategic planning cycles to ensure timely consideration of insights

Clear communication pathways ensure that the intelligence gathered through patent monitoring actually influences organizational decision-making.

Key Takeaways

Tracking competitor R&D pipelines through patent filings provides pharmaceutical companies with strategic advantages that can fundamentally transform their competitive positioning:

  1. Early competitive awareness allows proactive rather than reactive strategic planning, with visibility into competitor activities years before public disclosure.
  2. Comprehensive patent monitoring requires understanding different patent types, implementing systematic tracking processes, and utilizing specialized tools designed for pharmaceutical intelligence.
  3. Extracting strategic insights goes beyond document collection to identifying patterns, connecting patents to pipeline products, and recognizing technology trends across the industry.
  4. Advanced analytical techniques including landscape analysis, citation mapping, and semantic analysis transform raw patent data into actionable competitive intelligence.
  5. Sustainable intelligence functions require addressing challenges like information overload, building appropriate expertise, and establishing cross-functional collaboration mechanisms.
  6. Future capabilities will increasingly leverage artificial intelligence, integrated data sources, and real-time monitoring to provide even more valuable competitive insights.

As one PatSight user noted, “This product has assisted us in conducting a large amount of patent analysis, which has been very helpful in our project’s Go/No-Go decision-making process”6. By implementing systematic patent monitoring, pharmaceutical companies can achieve similar benefits in guiding their strategic decision-making and maintaining competitive advantage in this high-stakes industry.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between tracking patents and tracking clinical trials for competitive intelligence?

Patent tracking provides earlier visibility into competitor pipelines, often 5-10 years before clinical trials begin, revealing research directions, technological approaches, and potential product features. Clinical trial monitoring offers more definitive information about development status, target patient populations, and study designs, but comes much later in the development process. The most effective competitive intelligence programs combine both approaches to track competitors across the entire R&D continuum.

How can smaller companies with limited resources implement effective patent monitoring?

Smaller organizations should focus monitoring efforts on narrow therapeutic areas of direct relevance, utilize subscription-based patent tools rather than building custom systems, consider outsourcing initial screening while maintaining internal capabilities for strategic analysis, leverage free resources like MedsPaL for initial research, and establish clear ROI measures to justify incremental investment as the program demonstrates value.

How reliable are patents as indicators of actual development programs?

While patents generally indicate serious research interest, not all patented technologies advance to development. Studies suggest approximately 60-70% of pharmaceutical patents connect to active development programs, with higher percentages for later-stage patents containing extensive experimental data. Organizations should look for multiple patent filings around the same technology, growing experimental data across filings, and international filing patterns as indicators of serious development intent.

What legal considerations should be kept in mind when analyzing competitor patents?

Patent analysis for competitive intelligence purposes is generally legal when using publicly available information. However, organizations should avoid making public statements about patent validity that could be considered disparagement, ensure analysis doesn’t inadvertently create willful infringement risks for their own development programs, consult legal counsel before acting on patent intelligence that could impact freedom-to-operate, and maintain appropriate confidentiality around internal analysis and strategic responses.

How will AI and machine learning transform pharmaceutical patent intelligence in the coming years?

AI will increasingly automate data extraction from patent documents, improve recognition of chemical structures and biological sequences, enhance natural language processing to identify non-obvious connections between technologies, enable predictive analytics that forecast competitor activities based on historical patterns, facilitate real-time updating of competitive landscapes as new patents are published, and support more sophisticated visualization tools that make complex patent relationships accessible to non-specialist decision-makers.

Citations:

  1. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-approval-process-drugs/frequently-asked-questions-patents-and-exclusivity
  2. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/how-long-do-drug-patents-last/
  3. https://synapse.patsnap.com/blog/what-are-the-types-of-pharmaceutical-patents
  4. https://medicinespatentpool.org/what-we-do/medspal
  5. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/leveraging-patent-pending-data-for-pharmaceuticals/
  6. https://en.xtalpi.com/patsight/
  7. https://clarivate.com/intellectual-property/patent-intelligence/
  8. https://patentpc.com/blog/leverage-patent-analytics-in-biopharmaceuticals/
  9. https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/16/method-patents-biologics-patent-thicket/
  10. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/world-intellectual-property-indicators-2024-highlights/en/patents-highlights.html
  11. https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/patent-process-overview
  12. https://ttconsultants.com/how-to-use-patent-monitoring-to-track-competitors-and-their-patent-filing/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592140/
  14. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-do-you-patent-pharmaceutical-drug-paul-palmer
  15. https://www.patentrenewal.com/post/why-every-company-should-be-tracking-competitor-patents
  16. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/optimizing-your-drug-patent-strategy-a-comprehensive-guide-for-pharmaceutical-companies/
  17. https://phrma.org/en/Blog/ip-explained-how-does-the-us-patent-process-work
  18. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/the-importance-of-pharmaceutical-competitor-analysis/
  19. https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/drug-patents-and-the-fda-timelines-exclusivity-and-extensions
  20. https://sagaciousresearch.com/competitor-monitoring/
  21. https://xlscout.ai/how-to-track-competitors-and-their-patent-filings-using-patent-monitoring/
  22. https://techtransfer.cancer.gov/investigators/patent-process
  23. https://www.upcounsel.com/how-long-does-a-drug-patent-last
  24. https://patseer.com/a-quick-guide-to-pharmaceutical-patents-and-their-types/
  25. https://www.wipo.int/pat-informed/en/
  26. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/the-importance-of-pharmaceutical-competitor-analysis/
  27. https://gipresearch.com/patent-attorney/how-to-file-a-patent-for-drug-innovation/
  28. https://www.ajmc.com/view/a636-article
  29. https://www.allhealthpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Krishtel.Slides-AHP-DrugPatentWebinar-051619.pdf
  30. https://drugdatabase.info/resources-databases/
  31. https://sagaciousresearch.com/blog/how-to-use-patent-monitoring-to-track-competitors-and-their-patent-filing/
  32. https://www.theactuarymagazine.org/pharmaceutical-patent-regulation-in-the-united-states/
  33. https://clarivate.com/intellectual-property/patent-intelligence/innography/
  34. https://inspire.wipo.int/derwent-innovation
  35. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/leveraging-drug-patent-data-for-strategic-investment-decisions-a-comprehensive-analysis/
  36. https://www.greyb.com/elixir/
  37. https://pharmaboardroom.com/articles/diamonds-in-the-rough-discovering-rising-pharma-stars-through-patents/
  38. https://clarivate.com/intellectual-property/patent-intelligence/patent-analytics-services/
  39. https://clarivate.com/intellectual-property/patent-intelligence/derwent-innovation/
  40. https://patentpc.com/blog/how-to-track-and-monitor-competitive-patent-landscape-for-new-designs/
  41. https://umbrex.com/resources/industry-analyses/how-to-analyze-a-pharmaceutical-company/drug-pipeline-analysis/
  42. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/using-google-patents-for-drug-patent-research-a-comprehensive-guide/
  43. https://www.patsnap.com
  44. https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/examining-the-relative-rd-spend-to-patent-costs
  45. https://www.lanternpharma.com/about/patent-portfolio
  46. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/patent-analytics-market-102774
  47. https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/data-insights/patent-activity-futureofwork-pharmaceutical-industry/
  48. https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/the-economics-of-drug-discovery-and-the-impact-of-patents/
  49. https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2231/2023-07-24-why-pharma-companies-should-file-patents-later-rd
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31872495/
  51. https://harrityllp.com/services/patent-analytics/unlock-strategic-insights-with-our-patent-portfolio-quality-report/
  52. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1000870/european-patents-granted-in-pharmaceuticals-by-country/
  53. https://www.csrxp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CSRxP-Innovation-Fact-Sheet-September-2023-1.pdf
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667318523000132
  55. https://www.alacrita.com/blog/pharmaceutical-patents-an-overview
  56. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/feature/does-pharma-need-patents
  57. https://atyrpharma.com/our-science/intellectual-property/

Make Better Decisions with DrugPatentWatch

» Start Your Free Trial Today «

Copyright © DrugPatentWatch. Originally published at
DrugPatentWatch - Transform Data into Market Domination