Last Updated: May 10, 2026

DIVALPROEX SODIUM - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for divalproex sodium and what is the scope of patent protection?

Divalproex sodium is the generic ingredient in four branded drugs marketed by Abbvie, Ajanta Pharma Ltd, Alembic, Dr Reddys Labs Ltd, Mankind Pharma, Rising, Teva Pharms Usa, Zydus Pharms Usa Inc, Abbott, Actavis Labs Fl Inc, Apotex, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Chartwell Rx, Invatech, Lupin, Mylan, Orbion Pharms, Ph Health, Pharmobedient, Prinston Inc, Sun Pharm Inds, Teva, Unichem Labs Ltd, Upsher Smith Labs, Amneal Pharms, Annora Pharma, Cosette, Impax Labs, Lupin Ltd, Reddys, Sciegen Pharms, Unichem, and Yichang Humanwell, and is included in forty-two NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are eighteen drug master file entries for divalproex sodium. Forty-four suppliers are listed for this compound. There is one tentative approval for this compound.

Summary for DIVALPROEX SODIUM
Drug Prices for DIVALPROEX SODIUM

See drug prices for DIVALPROEX SODIUM

Drug Sales Revenue Trends for DIVALPROEX SODIUM

See drug sales revenues for DIVALPROEX SODIUM

Recent Clinical Trials for DIVALPROEX SODIUM

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Syneos HealthPhase 1
NuventraPhase 1
Emalex Biosciences Inc.Phase 1

See all DIVALPROEX SODIUM clinical trials

Generic filers with tentative approvals for DIVALPROEX SODIUM
Applicant Application No. Strength Dosage Form
⤷  Start Trial⤷  Start TrialEQ 500MG VALPROIC ACIDTABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL
⤷  Start Trial⤷  Start TrialEQ 250MG VALPROIC ACIDTABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL
⤷  Start Trial⤷  Start TrialEQ 125MG VALPROIC ACIDTABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL

The 'tentative' approval signifies that the product meets all FDA standards for marketing, and, but for the patents / regulatory protections, it would approved.

Pharmacology for DIVALPROEX SODIUM
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for DIVALPROEX SODIUM
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
DEPAKOTE ER Extended-release Tablets divalproex sodium 500 mg 021168 2005-02-08
DEPAKOTE ER Extended-release Tablets divalproex sodium 250 mg 021168 2004-05-03

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DIVALPROEX SODIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Prinston Inc DIVALPROEX SODIUM divalproex sodium TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 090210-002 Nov 30, 2009 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Annora Pharma DIVALPROEX SODIUM divalproex sodium TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 215527-001 Sep 26, 2023 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbott DEPAKOTE CP divalproex sodium TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 019794-001 Jul 11, 1990 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Chartwell Rx DIVALPROEX SODIUM divalproex sodium TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 077296-002 Jul 31, 2008 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

DIVALPROEX SODIUM Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 23, 2026

What is the market footing for divalproex sodium?

Divalproex sodium is an established oral anticonvulsant and mood-stabilizing agent used for conditions that include epilepsy and bipolar disorder. Commercial dynamics are shaped by (1) long treatment duration, (2) strong generic penetration, and (3) pricing pressure typical of mature, off-patent small-molecule products.

Commercial positioning (practical reality)

  • Generic-dominated market structure: Divalproex sodium is marketed as divalproex sodium delayed-release tablets and divalproex sodium extended-release tablets, with multiple generic entrants. In mature therapeutic classes, generic substitution drives volume share but compresses net prices.
  • Formulation split matters: Extended-release products often carry different pricing and payer preferences versus delayed-release, influencing net revenue mix even when total molecule demand is stable.

Formulation identifiers used in commerce

  • Delayed-release: Divalproex sodium delayed-release tablets.
  • Extended-release: Divalproex sodium extended-release tablets.

How do patent and exclusivity status shape pricing power?

Divalproex sodium is not a new chemical entity. Its market pricing and profit pool are constrained by the absence of meaningful, ongoing exclusivity for the branded molecule in most major markets, with generics capturing share.

Exclusivity constraint profile

  • Generic erosion: Once main patent protection ended, manufacturers shifted to abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA) and marketed generics at substantial discounts.
  • Reformulation does not restart a broad monopoly: Any incremental protections typically do not prevent generic competition on the active moiety at scale, limiting long-lived brand premium.

What market dynamics drive demand for divalproex sodium?

Demand is less about “new patient starts” and more about continuation therapy and substitution patterns.

Key demand drivers

  1. Chronic use profile: Many patients remain on valproate-based therapy for long durations, supporting base demand even in the face of generic pricing pressure.
  2. Payer controls and step therapy: Formularies and therapeutic substitutions influence net unit realizations. When generics are preferred, switching reduces brand-like pricing.
  3. Safety and tolerability management: Dosing schedules (delayed vs extended release) and monitoring practices influence real-world adherence, which in turn impacts persistence and refill volumes.

Key competitive dynamics

  • Interchange and switching: When generics have equivalent FDA-rated performance, pharmacy-level switching is common, pressuring realized price.
  • Inventory cycles and supply stability: Mature products experience periodic volume swings tied to procurement behavior and generic supply adjustments.

How has financial performance typically evolved in mature divalproex markets?

For a mature, generic-heavy CNS small molecule, the financial trajectory typically follows a sequence:

  • Early growth (pre-generic): Brand-led revenues with premium pricing.
  • Rapid revenue compression (post-generic launch): Unit volumes may remain stable while price per unit drops materially.
  • Platform stabilization: Revenues become more dependent on total prescription volume, inventory demand timing, and product mix (delayed vs extended release).
  • Periodic share movements: Shifts among generic manufacturers can alter revenue distribution without changing the underlying total category demand.

This trajectory aligns with how mature oral anticonvulsants behave across large markets, including the recurring pattern of lower net pricing with steady prescriptions.

What is the category impact on investor and business decisions?

The molecule’s economics favor strategies that improve execution in a price-compressed environment.

Business levers that matter most

  • Cost position and manufacturing capacity: Gross margin is determined by production economics and supply stability.
  • Product mix: Extended-release vs delayed-release mix can improve revenue stability when one format maintains relatively stronger payer preferences.
  • Contract performance: Bulk and wholesaler contracting drives realized pricing more than list price.

Where does the financial story concentrate across the value chain?

Manufacturer economics

  • Revenue depends on prescription volume and net price, with net price heavily influenced by generic competition intensity.
  • Margin is driven by manufacturing cost, regulatory compliance overhead, and channel contracting.

Distributor and payer economics

  • Payer and PBM contracting uses competitive tenders among generics, typically causing a race to the bottom on net unit pricing.
  • Reimbursement policies influence which labeled formulation wins at the point of dispensing.

What regulatory and listing mechanisms shape competitive behavior?

Market participants rely on FDA and payer infrastructure to sustain throughput and maintain inventory reliability.

FDA system participation

  • NDA/ANDA framework: Generic competition occurs through ANDAs for delayed-release and extended-release versions.
  • Orange Book driven substitution: Bioequivalence and listed products influence pharmacy substitution and payer coverage decisions.

Is there a measurable “molecule vs product” divergence in economics?

Yes. Even when total demand is molecule-stable, revenues can diverge by:

  • Release profile (extended vs delayed)
  • Dosage strength distribution
  • Package size and channel contracts
  • Manufacturer market share changes after pricing renegotiations

For divalproex sodium, the extended-release segment can carry different payer and patient preference patterns, which can affect net revenue per script even as the molecule remains generic.

What scenario map best fits divalproex sodium’s financial trajectory?

Given the mature and competitive nature of the market, the most actionable scenario map is built around competitive pricing rather than innovation cycles.

Base case (most consistent with mature generic dynamics)

  • Stable or slow-growth prescription volume
  • Continued price compression
  • Periodic share reallocation among generic suppliers

Downside case

  • Intensified generic competition (more entrants or aggressive contracting)
  • Supply disruptions leading to short-term price spikes then normalization

Upside case

  • Favorable payer contracting for specific manufacturers
  • Better-than-category persistence due to mix improvements (extended-release gains)

What are the practical implications for R&D and pipeline strategy?

For businesses evaluating divalproex-related opportunities, the molecule’s market structure implies:

  • New entrants need either clinical differentiation that meaningfully changes prescribing behavior or execution differentiation that improves market share and net pricing without relying on brand-style premium.
  • Development that targets the existing generic equivalent without a clear clinical or access advantage typically faces limited willingness-to-pay.

Key Takeaways

  • Divalproex sodium is a mature, generic-dominated CNS product where pricing pressure outweighs innovation-led upside.
  • Financial trajectory follows a standard pattern: post-generic revenue compression, then stabilization driven by volume, mix, and contracting.
  • Competitive advantage concentrates in manufacturing cost, supply reliability, and product mix (extended vs delayed) rather than new exclusivity.
  • Business value in this category comes from execution in a contract-driven market, not from long-duration brand-style pricing.

FAQs

How does generic competition typically change divalproex sodium revenues?

It lowers net price per prescription while total volumes often remain supported by chronic use. Revenue outcomes then depend on market share and formulation mix (extended vs delayed).

Does extended-release divalproex change the financial profile?

Yes. Extended-release can have different payer preferences and prescribing patterns, which can shift net revenue per unit even if molecule demand is stable.

What is the main determinant of margins for generic divalproex suppliers?

Manufacturing economics and channel contracting, including the ability to maintain supply continuity and compete on net pricing.

What market events most often move divalproex category performance in the short term?

Wholesale and payer contract renegotiations, shifts in generic manufacturer share, and any temporary supply constraints.

Is divalproex sodium an innovation-led market?

Not in the way patented, brand-differentiated therapies are. Value creation is primarily operational or access-driven unless a product introduces clear clinical or formulary-impacting differentiation.


References

[1] FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.