Last Updated: May 10, 2026

DIPHEN Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Diphen patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Diphen is a drug marketed by Usl Pharma, Morton Grove, Alra, Anabolic, Elkins Sinn, Fosun Pharma, Halsey, Heather, Heritage Pharma, Hikma Intl Pharms, Impax Labs, Ivax Sub Teva Pharms, Lannett, Lederle, LNK, Mk Labs, Mutual Pharm, Newtron Pharms, Nexgen Pharma Inc, Perrigo, Pioneer Pharms, Purepac Pharm, Pvt Form, Roxane, Sun Pharm Industries, Superpharm, Teva, Valeant Pharm Intl, Vangard, Watson Labs, Whiteworth Town Plsn, Bundy, Cenci, Kv Pharm, Naska, Pharm Assoc, App Pharms, Avet Lifesciences, Bel Mar, Dr Reddys, Gland, Hikma, Hospira, Lyphomed, Micro Labs, Pharmobedient, West-ward Pharms Int, Wyeth Ayerst, Alpharma Us Pharms, Cumberland Swan, Sciegen Pharms, Abraxis Pharm, Fresenius Kabi Usa, Intl Medication, Able, Ani Pharms, Ascot, Chartwell Rx, Dr Reddys Labs Sa, Inwood Labs, Leading, Parke Davis, Quagen, R And S Pharma, Specgx Llc, Strides Pharma Intl, Unichem, Winder Labs Llc, Scherer Rp, and Chartwell Molecular. and is included in one hundred and ten NDAs.

The generic ingredient in DIPHEN is phenytoin sodium. There are twenty-one drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-four suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the phenytoin sodium profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Diphen

A generic version of DIPHEN was approved as phenytoin sodium by HIKMA on December 31st, 1969.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DIPHEN?
  • What are the global sales for DIPHEN?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DIPHEN?
Recent Clinical Trials for DIPHEN

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerPhase 4
Hospira, Inc.Phase 4
University of PennsylvaniaPhase 4

See all DIPHEN clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DIPHEN

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
App Pharms DIPHENHYDRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE diphenhydramine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 040466-001 May 28, 2002 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Fosun Pharma DIPHENOXYLATE HYDROCHLORIDE AND ATROPINE SULFATE atropine sulfate; diphenoxylate hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 086173-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pvt Form DIPHENHYDRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE diphenhydramine hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 083027-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Newtron Pharms DIPHENHYDRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE diphenhydramine hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 086544-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
West-ward Pharms Int DIPHENHYDRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE diphenhydramine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 080817-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

DIPHEN Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 26, 2026

Diphen: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

No complete, authoritative drug-identification record is provided for “diphen.” “Diphen” can refer to multiple unrelated products (including salts, branded forms, and non-pharmaceutical entities). Without the specific active ingredient, brand name, dosage form, market (US/EU/China), and authorization status, a precise market and financial trajectory cannot be produced without risking incorrect claims.

What does “diphen” map to for market analysis?

A market trajectory requires unambiguous linkage to one of:

  • A named active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and its salt form
  • A branded product with National Drug Codes (US) and/or EPAR/CHMP identification (EU)
  • A specific marketing authorization (MA) dossier and strength/formulation (tablet, capsule, injection, etc.)
  • A specific strength and pack configuration that drive pricing and revenue

No such mapping exists in the input.

Can a financial trajectory be stated without the specific product record?

Revenue, pricing, and volume trends depend on:

  • Geographic scope (US vs EU vs UK vs China)
  • Corporate reporting basis (product revenue reporting by payer rebates vs net sales)
  • Patent and exclusivity position (orange book listing vs national equivalents)
  • Trade channel structure (wholesale acquisition cost vs negotiated pricing vs tender pricing)

Absent the product record, any numeric “financial trajectory” would be speculative.


Key Takeaways

  • The input “diphen” does not uniquely identify a single pharmaceutical drug.
  • Market dynamics and financial trajectory cannot be stated accurately without unambiguous product identification.
  • A correct analysis requires a single linked drug record (API, brand/formulation, geography, authorization status).

FAQs

  1. What market data is needed to model a drug’s revenue trajectory?
    Prices (WAC/WWL or net), unit volumes, rebate/tender mechanics, and country-level uptake by line of therapy.

  2. How do patents and exclusivities change the revenue curve?
    They determine the timing and probability of first generics/biosimilars, which compress net pricing and volumes post-entry.

  3. Why does “brand name ambiguity” matter for market sizing?
    Different products with the same short name can have different APIs, indications, strengths, and authorization statuses, producing different demand and pricing dynamics.

  4. What is the standard way investors benchmark pharmaceutical financial trajectory?
    Net sales by geography and period, margin drivers (rebates, manufacturing costs), and forecast scenarios around patent expiry and competitor entry.

  5. What would “diphen” analysis look like once identified?
    A patent-to-market timeline, payer and formulary dynamics, entry risk assessment, and a revenue bridge from current to post-exclusivity years.


References

No sources cited because the input does not specify a uniquely identifiable drug record.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.