Last Updated: May 11, 2026

DAPTOMYCIN Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Daptomycin, and when can generic versions of Daptomycin launch?

Daptomycin is a drug marketed by Accord Hlthcare, Aspiro, Be Pharms, Biocon Pharma, Dr Reddys, Eugia Pharma, Fresenius Kabi Usa, Hainan Poly Pharm, Hangzhou Zhongmei, Hengrui Pharma, Hikma, Hisun Pharm Hangzhou, Hospira, Maia Pharms Inc, Meitheal, Mylan, Mylan Labs Ltd, Qilu Pharm Hainan, Sagent Pharms Inc, Teva Pharms Usa, Xellia Pharms Aps, and Baxter Hlthcare Corp. and is included in thirty-one NDAs. There are four patents protecting this drug.

This drug has forty patent family members in twenty-four countries.

The generic ingredient in DAPTOMYCIN is daptomycin. There are ten drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-seven suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the daptomycin profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Daptomycin

A generic version of DAPTOMYCIN was approved as daptomycin by TEVA PHARMS USA on March 25th, 2016.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DAPTOMYCIN?
  • What are the global sales for DAPTOMYCIN?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DAPTOMYCIN?
Recent Clinical Trials for DAPTOMYCIN

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University Clinical Hospital na V.V.Vinogradov (branch of RUDN university na Patrice Lumumba)PHASE3
The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and ImmunityPHASE4
Todd C. Lee MD MPH FIDSAPHASE4

See all DAPTOMYCIN clinical trials

Pharmacology for DAPTOMYCIN
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for DAPTOMYCIN
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for DAPTOMYCIN
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
CUBICIN RF For Injection daptomycin 500 mg/vial 021572 1 2008-11-19

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DAPTOMYCIN

DAPTOMYCIN is protected by four US patents.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Baxter Hlthcare Corp DAPTOMYCIN IN 0.9% SODIUM CHLORIDE daptomycin SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 213645-004 Feb 27, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Mylan Labs Ltd DAPTOMYCIN daptomycin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 205037-001 Jun 5, 2018 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Maia Pharms Inc DAPTOMYCIN daptomycin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 217630-002 Nov 21, 2024 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Qilu Pharm Hainan DAPTOMYCIN daptomycin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 215316-001 Aug 24, 2021 AP RX No Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Meitheal DAPTOMYCIN daptomycin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 213786-001 Jun 29, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Accord Hlthcare DAPTOMYCIN daptomycin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 212667-001 Jul 12, 2019 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for DAPTOMYCIN

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Pfizer Europe MA EEIG Daptomycin Hospira daptomycin EMEA/H/C/004310Daptomycin is indicated for the treatment of the following infections.Adult and paediatric (1 to 17 years of age) patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTI).Adult patients with right-sided infective endocarditis (RIE) due to Staphylococcus aureus. It isrecommended that the decision to use daptomycin should take into account the antibacterial susceptibility of the organism and should be based on expert advice.Adult and paediatric (1 to 17 years of age) patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB).In adults, use in bacteraemia should be associated with RIE or with cSSTI, while in paediatric patients, use in bacteraemia should be associated with cSSTI.Daptomycin is active against Gram positive bacteria only. In mixed infections where Gram negative and/or certain types of anaerobic bacteria are suspected, daptomycin should be co-administered with appropriate antibacterial agent(s).Consideration should be given to official guidance on the appropriate use of antibacterial agents. Authorised yes no no 2017-03-22
Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. Cubicin daptomycin EMEA/H/C/000637Cubicin is indicated for the treatment of the following infections.Adult and paediatric (1 to 17 years of age) patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTI).Adult patients with right-sided infective endocarditis (RIE) due to Staphylococcus aureus.It is recommended that the decision to use daptomycin should take into account the antibacterial susceptibility of the organism and should be based on expert advice.Adult and paediatric (1 to 17 years of age) patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). In adults, use in bacteraemia should be associated with RIE or with cSSTI, while in paediatric patients, use in bacteraemia should be associated with cSSTI.Daptomycin is active against Gram positive bacteria only. In mixed infections where Gram negative and/or certain types of anaerobic bacteria are suspected, Cubicin should be co-administered with appropriate antibacterial agent(s). Consideration should be given to official guidance on the appropriate use of antibacterial agents. Authorised no no no 2006-01-19
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

International Patents for DAPTOMYCIN

See the table below for patents covering DAPTOMYCIN around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Spain 3018415 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112020003862 formulações de daptomicina. ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2018217322 Daptomycin formulations and uses thereof ⤷  Start Trial
Chile 2015000608 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112015005400 ⤷  Start Trial
New Zealand 742241 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for DAPTOMYCIN

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
1115417 SPC/GB06/024 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial SUPPLEMENTARY PROTECTION CERTIFICATE NO SPC/GB06/024 GRANTED TO CUBIST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC IN RESPECT OF THE PRODUCT DAPTOMYCIN, THE GRANT OF WHICH WAS ADVERTISED IN JOURNAL NO 6162 DATED 27 JUNE 2007 HAS HAD ITS MAXIMUM PERIOD OF DURATION CORRECTED, SUBJECT TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRESCRIBED FEES IT WILL EXPIRE ON 22 JANUARY 2021.
1115417 06C0022 France ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: DAPTOMYCINE; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/05/328/001-002 20060119
1115417 SZ 22/2006 Austria ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: DAPTOMYCIN
1115417 CA 2006 00018 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: DAPTOMYCIN
1115417 22/2006 Austria ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: DAPTOMYCIN; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/05/328/001 UND 002 20060119
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Daptomycin: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 24, 2026

Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic used for serious Gram-positive infections, including complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) and bacteremia/right-sided infective endocarditis (with activity extended to off-label uses in some settings). The financial trajectory is shaped by (1) price erosion from generic entry, (2) payer and hospital formulary pressure toward lower-cost agents, (3) shifting utilization patterns driven by stewardship and safety monitoring, and (4) competition from newer Gram-positive therapies and alternative classes.

How large is daptomycin’s market and where does demand come from?

Primary use markets

Daptomycin demand concentrates in:

  • cSSSI and bloodstream infections caused by susceptible Gram-positive pathogens.
  • Right-sided infective endocarditis in labeled indications (and clinically adjacent treatment settings).
  • Institutional hospital procurement rather than retail pharmacy pull-through.

Geography and channel

  • In major developed markets, demand moves with hospital formularies and contracting, not consumer demand.
  • In the US, revenue is heavily influenced by managed care contracting and the post-patent transition to generic and authorized generic supply.

Demand drivers

Core volume drivers are:

  • Hospital admission patterns for serious infections
  • Antibiotic stewardship protocols that determine when a high-cost agent is selected
  • Clinical guidance on duration and monitoring, especially creatine phosphokinase (CPK) surveillance in risk patients (a decision point for formulary committees)

What market dynamics are dominating current pricing and volume?

1) Patent expiry and generic substitution

Daptomycin’s economics are dominated by US and EU patent expiry timelines and the speed of generic substitution after launch of lower-cost entrants. Once multiple generics gain share, list price becomes a poor proxy for net revenue, since payer contracting resets effective prices.

2) Hospital contracting and reference pricing

Hospital systems and group purchasing organizations exert pressure through:

  • competitive tendering among line items
  • reference pricing versus comparator antibiotics
  • step-therapy practices when clinically appropriate

3) Safety and protocol standardization

Daptomycin’s use is standard in serious Gram-positive infections but depends on local protocols that address:

  • CPK monitoring
  • dose adjustments and discontinuation criteria
  • avoidance or caution with certain co-administered agents in specific risk profiles

Where monitoring costs and staff workload rise, formulary committees can tighten usage criteria, especially for lower-acuity cases.

4) Competitive set for Gram-positive infections

Daptomycin competes against:

  • Other parenteral agents used in cSSSI and bloodstream infections (including alternative Gram-positive coverage)
  • Agents with different administration profiles or payer-preferred status
  • Newer antibiotics and regimen strategies that can win share in specific pathogen or resistance subsets

How does the financial trajectory of daptomycin typically evolve post-patent?

The daptomycin revenue curve in most markets follows a repeatable pattern:

  1. Pre-transition (branded dominance): highest margin, strong contracting position, broad formulary access.
  2. Transition (first generic arrivals): accelerated price compression, volume still partially offsets price drop.
  3. Mature generic phase: net price continues to fall; volume stabilizes or declines depending on stewardship and competition.
  4. Late-stage (multi-source equilibrium): margins stabilize at low levels; growth is largely tied to infection incidence and minor protocol shifts.

In business terms, the trajectory depends less on “biologic growth” and more on contracting outcomes and relative economics of alternative therapies.

What are the commercial pressure points that decide revenue in daptomycin?

Net price is the critical variable

Daptomycin’s branded list pricing power typically erodes quickly once multiple generic products exist. Revenue performance becomes a function of:

  • weighted average net price under payer contracts
  • mix by dose and treatment duration
  • share of tendered formulary positions

Use-case mix changes

Revenue can fall faster than volume if:

  • case mix shifts to pathogens requiring alternative therapies
  • protocols shorten or restrict daptomycin usage
  • clinicians migrate to competing regimens for certain infection types

Financial outcome summary

Across major markets, the expected pattern is:

  • downward net price after generic entry
  • flattening or decline in branded revenue
  • shift from high-margin branded economics to low-margin multi-source competition

This pattern is consistent with how anti-infective niche specialists experience post-patent commoditization in inpatient hospital markets.

Key historical and strategic milestones affecting market outcomes

Origin and brand positioning

Daptomycin is marketed as Cubicin in the US market historically. Its clinical adoption is driven by demonstrated activity in serious Gram-positive infections and institutional uptake for cSSSI and bacteremia/right-sided endocarditis.

Generic transition

Generic entry introduces:

  • substantial net price compression
  • procurement preference for lower-cost SKUs
  • reduced differentiation versus other Gram-positive agents

Regulatory and manufacturing scale

Mature multi-source supply can support continued volume, but it also drives pricing pressure when procurement shifts to the lowest contracted price.

Where does money go: revenue vs. margin profile after commoditization?

Branded phase

  • Higher net margin
  • More stable net pricing due to contracting leverage and limited alternatives
  • Revenue tied to volume growth and market access

Generic phase

  • Margin collapses
  • Revenue tracks infection incidence and contracting outcomes
  • Share is determined by tender success and supply reliability

What competitors and substitution dynamics matter most?

Substitution tends to occur in two scenarios:

  • Protocol-driven switching for certain infection types or severity levels
  • Budget-driven switching when formulary committees set preferred agents based on total acquisition cost and administration logistics

The result is that daptomycin’s financial performance increasingly resembles a commodity antibiotic within the Gram-positive inpatient space.

Market trajectory by timeline (conceptual)

Phase Dominant driver Revenue shape Pricing outcome
Branded dominance clinical differentiation + formulary access growth or stable high net price
First generic entrants competitive contracting decline accelerated sharp net price compression
Mature multi-source tendering + reference pricing stabilization or decline low net price, limited upside
Late-stage mix changes and stewardship flat to down margins constrained

Key Takeaways

  • Daptomycin’s market is dominated by inpatient hospital contracting, with demand concentrated in serious Gram-positive infections.
  • The financial trajectory is shaped primarily by generic substitution and net price compression, not by new patient acquisition.
  • Stewardship and safety monitoring protocols can tighten or expand usage criteria, impacting volume and mix.
  • In mature phases, daptomycin behaves like a low-margin multi-source product, with revenue depending on infection incidence and tender outcomes.

FAQs

1) What determines daptomycin revenue after generic entry?

Net revenue depends on weighted average net price, dose and duration mix, and share of hospital tendered formulary positions.

2) Does daptomycin face switching due to safety monitoring?

Usage is influenced by local protocols for CPK monitoring and risk management, which can affect prescribing thresholds.

3) What infection types most affect daptomycin utilization?

The largest labeled demand comes from cSSSI and bacteremia/right-sided endocarditis, with hospital practice potentially expanding or restricting indications based on stewardship.

4) Who are the substitution threats in hospital formularies?

Competitors are other parenteral Gram-positive options and newer regimen strategies that win formulary access based on cost and protocol fit.

5) Is growth still possible in a mature market?

Yes, but upside is typically limited to infection incidence trends and protocol-driven mix changes, not to branded-style price expansion.


References

[1] Cubicin (daptomycin) prescribing information. FDA.
[2] Drugs@FDA: Cubicin (daptomycin) NDA and labeling history. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[3] IMS/US hospital antibiotic contracting dynamics (general market structure). Peer-reviewed and industry analyses on inpatient antibiotic procurement and formulary switching.
[4] General literature on daptomycin safety monitoring (CPK monitoring) and clinical protocols. Peer-reviewed sources.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.