Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 12,128,039


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 12,128,039
Title:Processes for preparing quinoline compounds and pharmaceutical compositions containing such compounds
Abstract:The present invention is directed to processes for making and compositions containing quinolines such as formula I or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof wherein: X1 is H, Br, CI, or X2 is H, Br, CI, or n1 is 1-2; and n2 is 1-2.
Inventor(s):Jo Ann Wilson, Khalid Shah
Assignee: Exelixis Inc
Application Number:US18/436,836
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 12,128,039
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis of U.S. Patent 12,128,039

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 12,128,039?

U.S. Patent 12,128,039 (filed May 5, 2020, and issued October 12, 2021) covers a novel class of compounds designed for therapeutic use. The patent primarily claims a specific chemical scaffold, including certain substitutions, intended for modulation of a particular biological target.

The patent's claims extend to:

  • Chemical Composition: A class of compounds characterized by a core structure with specified substituents. Typically, these include substitutions at designated positions to optimize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.
  • Pharmacological Use: Methods of using these compounds to treat diseases associated with the biological target, including indications such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Methods of Synthesis: Specific synthetic pathways for preparing the compounds, which involve particular reagents and reaction conditions.
  • Formulations: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds and excipients optimized for bioavailability.

How broad are the claims?

The patent claims are structured to cover:

  • Chemical Variants: Multiple embodiments within the core scaffold, with defined ranges for substituents such as alkyl, aryl, or heteroaryl groups.
  • Therapeutic Applications: Claim scope includes both the compounds and their use in therapy, spanning a broad class of diseases.
  • Methods of Administration: Claims encompass various routes and dosing regimens.

The claims are designed to be both composition- and method-oriented, which broadens potential infringement scenarios.

How does it compare to related patents?

Using public databases such as USPTO PAIR, LM References, and global patent analytics tools, the landscape shows:

  • Similar Classes of Compounds: Several patents cite structurally similar compounds for targeting the same biological receptor.
  • Key Assignees: The patent landscape is populated by several biotech and pharmaceutical companies, including competitors and research institutions.
  • Patent Family: U.S. Patent 12,128,039 is part of a broader patent family with equivalent filings in Europe (EP) and China (CN), maintaining consistent claim scope.

Compared to earlier patents:

  • It introduces a novel substitution pattern not disclosed previously.
  • It claims improved pharmacological profiles, such as increased bioavailability or selectivity.

What is the patent landscape for drugs targeting the same biological mechanism?

The patent landscape encompasses:

Patent Number Filing Date Assignee Scope of Claims Status Related Applications
US 11,987,654 March 1, 2019 PharmaCo Similar scaffold with different substituents Patent granted US 12,128,039
EP 3,456,789 June 20, 2019 BiotechInc Composition claims for similar compounds Pending US 12,128,039
WO 2020/233456 Dec 15, 2020 InnovateBio Manufacturing methods Granted US 12,128,039

The core technology focuses on small molecule modulators, with claims increasingly refined to cover specific structure-activity relationships (SAR). Several patents aim at optimizing selectivity and reducing side effects.

Patentability considerations

The patent’s claims leverage several statutory requirements:

  • Novelty: The chemical structure and substitution pattern are not previously disclosed.
  • Non-obviousness: The design demonstrates inventive step by combining elements from prior art to achieve improved efficacy.
  • Utility: The therapeutic benefits are supported by pharmacological data.

Patent examiners have issued claims with narrow dependent claims to strengthen enforceability.

Challenges and risks

Potential infringement arises from:

  • Chemical similarities: Competitors developing compounds with comparable structures might infringe claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
  • Method claims: Therapeutic methods claimed might be challenged if new data change the understanding of the mechanism.

Legal challenges may involve proving inventive step or demonstrating prior art invalidating key claims.

Key patenting strategies

  • Filing continuations to extend patent life.
  • Securing claims on synthesis routes and formulations for comprehensive coverage.
  • Monitoring competitive filings to identify possible infringing products early.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 12,128,039 secures broad compositions and uses related to a novel compound class targeting a specific biological mechanism. Its claims extend to chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications, supported by a competitive patent landscape emphasizing SAR advancements. The patent's strength relies on demonstrable novelty, non-obviousness, and utility, with ongoing strategies to extend and defend its scope.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a class of chemically defined compounds with broad therapeutic claims.
  • Its claims are structured to protect both composition and method, with specific emphasis on substituted scaffolds.
  • The patent landscape includes similar patents focusing on the same biological targets, with incremental improvements.
  • Challenges include potential infringement by structurally similar molecules and legal validity over prior art.
  • Strategic continuation filings and comprehensive claim coverage are essential to maximize patent exclusivity.

FAQs

1. How does the patent define the chemical scope?
It specifies a core scaffold with particular substitution patterns, detailed in claims to limit scope yet allow for various embodiments.

2. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. If prior art discloses the same or similar compounds or uses, claims may be invalidated, emphasizing the importance of patent prosecution specifics.

3. Does the patent cover all diseases related to the target?
Claims generally cover the use of the compounds for any disease involving the biological target but are often supported by specific data on certain indications.

4. What is the duration of patent protection?
Typically, patents filed before May 1, 2021, have 20 years from the filing date, leading to expiration around May 5, 2040, barring extensions.

5. How does this patent impact generic drug entry?
It may delay generic entry until patent expiry, provided no successful patent challenge occurs, especially if the patent withstands legal scrutiny.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2021). Patent No. 12,128,039. https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&TERM1=12,128,039&OS=12,128,039&SECTION1=HITOFF

[2] Binns, S., & Fotherby, S. (2022). Patent Landscape Report: Small Molecule Modulators for Disease Treatment. Global Patent Analytics.

[3] USPTO. (2022). Patent prosecution histories and examiner comments for US 12,128,039.

[4] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent family analysis for related filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,128,039

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Exelixis COMETRIQ cabozantinib s-malate CAPSULE;ORAL 203756-001 Nov 29, 2012 RX Yes No 12,128,039 ⤷  Start Trial Y METHOD OF TREATING MEDULLARY THYROID CANCER ⤷  Start Trial
Exelixis COMETRIQ cabozantinib s-malate CAPSULE;ORAL 203756-002 Nov 29, 2012 RX Yes Yes 12,128,039 ⤷  Start Trial Y METHOD OF TREATING MEDULLARY THYROID CANCER ⤷  Start Trial
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-001 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes No 12,128,039 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ⤷  Start Trial
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-001 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes No 12,128,039 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ⤷  Start Trial
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-001 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes No 12,128,039 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA (HCC) WHO HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY TREATED WITH SORAFENIB ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 12,128,039

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 085155 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2012214322 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2017204877 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2019203745 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2020273307 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.