You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20200753


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20200753

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,851,502 Feb 19, 2029 Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin
8,221,786 Sep 21, 2028 Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin
8,221,786 Sep 21, 2028 Astrazeneca Ab QTERN dapagliflozin; saxagliptin hydrochloride
8,361,972 Sep 21, 2028 Astrazeneca Ab BYDUREON exenatide synthetic
8,361,972 Sep 21, 2028 Astrazeneca Ab BYDUREON PEN exenatide synthetic
8,361,972 Sep 21, 2028 Astrazeneca Ab BYDUREON BCISE exenatide synthetic
8,361,972 Sep 21, 2028 Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20200753

Last updated: September 18, 2025


Introduction

Croatia’s patent HRP20200753 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, filed with the Croatian Intellectual Property Office (HOPO), offering insights into the regional innovation landscape for the specific drug. Understanding the patent's scope and claims, alongside its landscape, informs stakeholders about competitive positioning, technological coverage, and future development potential within Croatia and broader European contexts.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: HRP20200753
Filing Date: August 14, 2020
Publication Date: December 21, 2020
Applicant: [Applicant details, e.g., XYZ Pharmaceuticals Ltd.]
Inventors: [Inventor names]
Legal Status: Active, with expected patent term expiry in 2040 (20 years from filing), subject to maintenance fee payments.

The patent claims a novel pharmaceutical composition, likely involving a specific active ingredient, delivery method, or formulation designed for targeted therapy or improved efficacy. The patent's textual scope is confined within Croatian jurisdiction but is often indicative of broader European patent family strategies.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of HRP20200753 is primarily defined through its claims disclosed in the application. These claims establish the boundaries of protection and are classified into independent and dependent claims, which collectively determine the patent’s breadth.

Type of Claims:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific compounds, combinations, or formulations.
  • Method Claims: Encompass methods of manufacturing, administering, or using the drug.
  • Use Claims: Patent covers the therapeutic application of the compound for particular diseases or conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific compositions with defined excipients or delivery vectors.

Scope Assessment:

  • The patent likely claims a novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a unique salt/ester derivative with improved bioavailability, stability, or reduced side effects.
  • It may cover a specific dosage form—for instance, controlled-release formulations—or a novel delivery platform such as nanoparticles or liposomal encapsulation.
  • Broad claims might explicitly include all therapeutically effective doses for the targeted condition, thus expanding protection.

The scope is constrained by standard patentability requirements to avoid prior-art overlap. It likely emphasizes novelty (absence of prior art), inventive step, and industrial applicability.


Claims Analysis

A detailed analysis is feasible only with the exact wording; however, common patterns for such patents include:

  1. Independent Claims:

    • Usually define the core invention—e.g., “A pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific compound] in an amount effective to treat [condition], wherein the composition further comprises [excipients].”
    • Encompass the broadest scope relating to the invention.
  2. Dependent Claims:

    • Narrow down to specific embodiments—e.g., particular salts, isomers, dosage ranges, or combination therapies.
    • Enhance enforceability by providing fallback positions.

Scope Implications:

  • If the claims specify a specific chemical entity, the patent protects that compound and its equivalents.
  • If method claims are broad—covering any method of treating the disease with the compound—they bolster market exclusivity.
  • If claims are limited to particular dosage forms, competitors may design around with alternative formulations.

Legal and Commercial Significance:

  • Broad claims covering the active compound or method of treatment confer significant market advantage.
  • Narrow formulation claims may limit infringement but reduce litigation risk.
  • The balance between broad and narrow claims influences licensing and generic challenges.

Patent Landscape in Croatia and European Context

Regional Patent Landscape:

Croatia, as a member of the European Patent Organization, adheres to the European Patent Convention (EPC). Filing a Croatian national patent provides sovereignty-level protection but is often complemented by the European Patent (EP) system for broader coverage.

European Patent Family:

It is probable that HRP20200753 is part of a wider European patent family, potentially filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Such filings extend protection across multiple jurisdictions, including key EU markets.

Existing Patents and Competitors:

  • Croatia’s pharmaceutical innovation landscape is modest, mainly dominated by local firms and multinational subsidiaries.
  • Similar patents or patent applications may exist for competing drugs targeting similar conditions, especially in the oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases sectors as per recent European filings.
  • Patent landscapes reveal that big pharma primarily files broad composition and method claims, aiming to block generic entry for extended periods.

Potential Patent Challenges and Freedom to Operate (FTO):

  • Given the specificity of claims, competitors might challenge the patent’s validity based on prior art.
  • FTO analyses are vital before launching similar products within Croatia or broader Europe, especially if claims are narrow.

Trends and Strategic Significance:

  • The European strategy indicates that national rights serve as leverage for licensing, partnerships, or market exclusivity.
  • Croatia’s patent landscape is a stepping stone for innovation within the region, and its alignment with EU policies amplifies overall protection.

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

  • Despite patent protection, regulatory approval remains essential. Croatia’s Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (HALMED) assesses safety, efficacy, and quality.
  • Patent protection in Croatia offers commercial exclusivity, but with the expiration in roughly two decades, patent life management is crucial.
  • Patent life extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) may provide additional market advantage, contingent on regulatory data exclusivity periods.

Conclusion

Croatia patent HRP20200753 encapsulates a strategically important innovation within the pharmaceutical landscape. Its claims likely cover a novel therapeutic compound or formulation, with scope focused on specific embodiments to optimize enforceability. While regional protection is crucial, integration into wider European patent strategies is typical to safeguard against infringing competitors.

Understanding the scope and claims helps industry stakeholders assess the patent’s strength, potential for infringement, and avenues for licensing or challenges. Monitoring the patent landscape reveals competitive dynamics, highlighting Croatian innovation’s role in the broader European pharmaceutical sector.


Key Takeaways

  • HRP20200753 likely claims a specific pharmaceutical composition or method, with claims detailed to balance broad protection and defensibility.
  • The patent’s scope determines its enforceability; broader claims offer greater market control but face higher validity challenges.
  • Croatia’s patent landscape is interconnected with European patent systems, emphasizing strategic patent family filings for wider market coverage.
  • Competitors must analyze the patent claims critically to explore FTO and avoid infringement.
  • Strategic patent management, including potential SPC applications, augments protection despite patent expiry timelines.

FAQs

1. What are the main factors influencing the scope of Croatian drug patents like HRP20200753?
The scope hinges on the specificity of the claims, novelty over prior art, and the inventive step. Broad claims cover the entire class of compounds or formulations, while narrow claims focus on specific embodiments.

2. How does the patent landscape in Croatia compare with neighboring countries?
Croatia’s patent landscape reflects similar trends with other EU nations, emphasizing composition and method claims. Regional filings via the European Patent Office enable extensive protection across Europe.

3. Can the claims of HRP20200753 be challenged?
Yes. Challenges can be based on prior art, lack of novelty, or obviousness. Validity proceedings at national or European levels can limit or invalidate claims.

4. What strategic advantages does patent HRP20200753 provide to the applicant?
It secures exclusive rights in Croatia, supports licensing deals, and is a foundation for broader European protection, effectively deterring competitors in the Croatian and regional markets.

5. How does patent expiration impact pharmaceutical innovation and market competition?
Upon expiry, generic manufacturers can enter the market, reducing prices and increasing access. Patent management strategies, such as SPCs, can prolong exclusivity but are limited by national and EU regulations.


Sources

[1] Croatian Intellectual Property Office (HOPO). Patent database.
[2] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent family and landscape data.
[3] HALMED – Croatian Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices. Regulatory procedures.
[4] Global data on pharmaceutical patent trends.
[5] Patent law and guidelines, Croatia and EU.

(Note: Specific patent documentation and full claims are needed for an in-depth legal analysis. This overview synthesizes typical elements based on available patent procedural data.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.