You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 17, 2025

India Drug Patents


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Patents in India and US Equivalents

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
Patent Number Estimated Expiration Equivalent US Patent US Expiry Date Generic Name US Applicant US Tradename
166560 ⤷  Subscribe 4820522 2007-07-27 acetaminophen J And J Consumer Inc TYLENOL
166560 ⤷  Subscribe 4968509 2007-11-06 acetaminophen J And J Consumer Inc TYLENOL
166560 ⤷  Subscribe 5004613 2007-07-27 acetaminophen J And J Consumer Inc TYLENOL
190037 ⤷  Subscribe 6451340 2018-07-23 adefovir dipivoxil Gilead HEPSERA
192609 ⤷  Subscribe 6431168 2018-12-08 albuterol sulfate Glaxosmithkline VENTOLIN HFA
192609 ⤷  Subscribe 7107986 2018-12-06 albuterol sulfate Glaxosmithkline VENTOLIN HFA
168414 ⤷  Subscribe 4879303 2007-09-25 amlodipine besylate Viatris NORVASC
>Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Equivalent US Patent >US Expiry Date >Generic Name >US Applicant >US Tradename

Key Insights for Patentability, Enforceability, and the Scope of Claims for Biopharmaceutical Patents in the India Patent Office

Introduction

The Indian Patent Office (IPO) has undergone significant changes and clarifications in recent years, particularly in the realm of biopharmaceutical patents. Understanding these developments is crucial for both domestic and international pharmaceutical companies seeking to protect and enforce their intellectual property in India.

Patentability Criteria for Biopharmaceuticals

Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy

The IPO has introduced new draft guidelines that replace the phrase "enhanced efficacy" with "enhanced therapeutic efficacy" as the sole criterion for granting new patents for drug substances. This change aims to standardize the patent examination process and ensure that only significant therapeutic improvements are recognized as patentable[1].

Rejection of Other Criteria

Other criteria such as enhanced bioavailability are no longer considered for the assessment of patentability of known drugs. This clarification aligns with previous court rulings, including those from the Madras High Court in 2006 and the Supreme Court in 2013[1].

Criticism and Reforms

The amendments to the patent norms were partly driven by criticism from foreign companies and trade bodies, such as BIO, regarding the lack of consistent adherence to patent rules and procedures across India's regional patent offices. These reforms aim to minimize patent litigations and ensure uniform standards of patent examination[1].

Enforceability of Biopharmaceutical Patents

Robust Enforcement Regime

India's enforcement regime for pharmaceutical patents is robust, with procedural changes facilitating quicker adjudication of patent infringement lawsuits. For instance, the Delhi High Court can now adjudicate pharmaceutical patent infringement cases within one to one-and-a-half years[2].

Judicial Developments

Key judicial developments, such as the Bayer Corporation & Anr vs Union of India & Ors case, have clarified that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) does not have the authority to enforce patents by refusing marketing approval to generic manufacturers. This means that generic manufacturers can seek marketing approval even if the originator drug is still under patent, although they cannot market the drug until the patent expires[2].

Patent Linkage

Unlike in some other countries, India does not have a "patent linkage" system where marketing approvals are directly linked to patent status. However, there are proposals to implement such a system, and currently, the DCGI requests details of granted patents for new medicines to ensure compliance[5].

Scope of Claims for Biopharmaceutical Patents

Claims vs. Working Examples

The Delhi High Court has reinforced that the scope of a patent is defined by its claims, not by the working examples provided in the application. This means that working examples serve only to demonstrate the feasibility of the invention and do not determine the extent of patent protection[3].

Specificity and Clarity

Patent applications must be precise and clear in their claims. The Bayer Pharm Aktiengesellschaft v. The Controller General of Patents and Designs case highlights the importance of ensuring that specific grounds of refusal are clearly mentioned in the notice preceding the hearing, allowing applicants a fair opportunity to address objections[3].

Application and Examination Process

Required Documents

A patent application in India must include several key documents, such as the application form, proof of right from the inventor, provisional or complete specification, and a statement and undertaking under Section 8 of the Patents Act, 1970. These documents must be filed within specified timeframes to avoid delays or rejection[4].

Forms and Procedures

Applicants must file forms such as Form-1, Form-2, Form-3, and Form-5, along with appropriate evidence if they are MSMEs or startups. Authorisation of an agent must also be filed within the specified period[4].

Global Significance of India's Pharmaceutical Patent Laws

Amendments and Impact

The Indian Patents Act, 1970, was amended in 2005 to provide product patents in chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and other fields. These amendments have significant global implications, as they affect how pharmaceutical companies protect and enforce their patents in a major market like India[5].

Generic Manufacturing

In India, generic manufacturing companies can apply for marketing approval of generic products even if the originator drug's patent is still valid. However, they cannot market the generic drug until the patent expires. This system allows for early preparation but does not permit market entry until the patent term ends[5].

Challenges and Future Directions

Consistency and Training

Despite the reforms, there is still a need for increased training on patentability criteria and consistent adherence to patent rules across regional offices. This will help in reducing confusion and litigation related to pharmaceutical patents[1].

Patent Litigations

High-profile cases like the Novartis AG vs Union of India have highlighted the complexities and controversies surrounding pharmaceutical patent litigation in India. The new guidelines aim to minimize such litigations by providing clearer criteria for patentability[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy: The sole criterion for granting new patents for drug substances.
  • Robust Enforcement: India's enforcement regime is robust, with quicker adjudication of patent infringement cases.
  • Claims Over Examples: The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, not working examples.
  • Application Process: Specific documents and forms are required for patent applications, with strict timelines.
  • Global Implications: India's patent laws significantly impact global pharmaceutical companies.

FAQs

Q: What is the new criterion for granting patents for drug substances in India?

A: The new criterion is "enhanced therapeutic efficacy," replacing the earlier phrase "enhanced efficacy"[1].

Q: Can generic manufacturers apply for marketing approval if the originator drug is still under patent in India?

A: Yes, generic manufacturers can apply for marketing approval, but they cannot market the generic drug until the patent expires[5].

Q: How long does it take to adjudicate pharmaceutical patent infringement cases in India?

A: Cases can be adjudicated within one to one-and-a-half years, thanks to procedural changes[2].

Q: What defines the scope of a patent in India?

A: The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, not by the working examples provided in the application[3].

Q: Are there proposals to implement a patent linkage system in India?

A: Yes, there are proposals, but currently, there is no direct linkage between marketing approvals and patent status[5].

Sources

  1. Indian Patent Office (IPO) Issues New Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Patents - Sagacious Research
  2. Life Sciences & Pharma IP Litigation 2024 - India - Chambers and Partners
  3. Claim vs. Example: Insights from Bayer's Patent Ruling - Kankrishme
  4. Manual for Patent Office Practice and Procedure - Indian Patent Office
  5. The Global Significance of India's Pharmaceutical Patent Laws - AIPLA

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.