You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Drugs in ATC Class A10BK


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drugs in ATC Class: A10BK - Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for ATC Class A10BK – Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

The ATC classification system’s A10BK subgroup encompasses Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, representing a rapidly evolving segment in the therapeutic management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These agents have revolutionized the diabetic treatment paradigm by offering effective glycemic control alongside cardiovascular and renal benefits. The market trajectory and patent intricacies within this class underpin significant strategic positioning, R&D investments, and competitive maneuvers among pharmaceutical players.

This analysis distills current market dynamics, innovation trends, and the complex patent landscape shaping the future of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Market Dynamics

Global Market Overview

The global SGLT2 inhibitor market was valued at approximately USD 12 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 23 billion by 2028, with a CAGR of around 12% (source: MarketsandMarkets). This growth is primarily driven by:

  • Efficacy in glycemic control: SGLT2 inhibitors lower blood glucose independently of insulin, enhancing treatment flexibility.
  • Cardio-renal benefits: Evidence from randomized trials (e.g., EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS) indicating reduced cardiovascular and renal events significantly boosts adoption.
  • Expanding indications: Recent approvals extend these drugs to heart failure and chronic kidney disease management.
  • Evolving treatment guidelines: Leading diabetes associations recommend SGLT2 inhibitors as first-line or add-on therapy, further accelerating market penetration.

Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Robust clinical evidence: Demonstrates cardiovascular mortality reduction and renal protective effects.
  • Increasing diabetes prevalence: The global rise in T2DM, especially in emerging economies, fuels demand.
  • Patient adherence: Oral administration and favorable safety profile improve patient compliance.
  • Strategic collaborations: Big pharma, such as AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, partners with biotechs to expand pipeline options.

Barriers:

  • Adverse effects concerns: Risk of genitourinary infections and rare cases of ketoacidosis temper usage.
  • Pricing and reimbursement issues: Cost-effective positioning and payer acceptance vary globally.
  • Market saturation: Leading agents such as empagliflozin (Jardiance) and dapagliflozin (Farxiga) capture significant shares, challenging new entrants.

Competitive Landscape

Key players include:

  • AstraZeneca with Farxiga (dapagliflozin)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly with Jardiance (empagliflozin)
  • Pfizer with Crenaliz (ertugliflozin)
  • Remogliflozin and ipragliflozin as emerging compounds.

Emerging competitors focus on differentiation through improved safety profiles, fixed-dose combinations, and expansion into heart failure and renal indications.

Pipeline and Innovation Trends

Current R&D emphasizes:

  • Dual and triple therapies: Combining SGLT2 inhibitors with GLP-1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors.
  • Next-generation molecules: Featuring enhanced potency, selectivity, and reduced side effects.
  • Non-diabetic indications: Exploring applications in obesity, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and diabetic kidney disease.

Patent Landscape

Key Patent Trends

The patent landscape is crucial for understanding market exclusivity and innovation trajectories. Patent filings have historically focused on:

  • Compound patents: Covering novel SGLT2 inhibitors, including dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin.
  • Method-of-use patents: Expanding therapeutic indications.
  • Combination patents: Covering fixed-dose combinations with other antidiabetics.

Major Patent Holders and Approvals

  • AstraZeneca secured core patents for dapagliflozin in the early 2010s, with expiration anticipated around 2030.
  • Boehringer Ingelheim/Eli Lilly maintained patents for empagliflozin, some extending into the mid-2030s.
  • Pfizer's ertugliflozin patents are expected to expire between 2030-2035.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

Patent disputes often revolve around:

  • Patent validity: Claims of obviousness or insufficient inventive step.
  • Invalidity challenges: Filed by generic manufacturers aiming for market entry.
  • Patent thickets: Overlapping patents, which complicate generic approval pathways.

The ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Application) pathway in key jurisdictions like the U.S. prompts patent litigations, influencing market entry timing for generics.

Patent Expiry and Market Implications

With major patents set to expire over the next decade, the landscape anticipates a wave of generic entrants, intensifying price competition and market access strategies. Companies are increasingly investing in novel formulations, new indications, and drug delivery innovations to extend patent life.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovator companies are focusing on next-generation SGLT2 molecules, expanded indications, and combination therapies to sustain competitive advantage beyond patent expiry.
  • Generic manufacturers monitor patent litigation and regulatory pathways to capitalize on upcoming patent cliffs.
  • Investors should consider the lifecycle timing of key molecules, patent expiration timelines, and pipeline advancement.

Key Takeaways

  • The SGLT2 inhibitors market is positioned for sustained growth driven by clinical efficacy, expanded indications, and evolving treatment guidelines.
  • Market competition remains fierce, with a few dominant players controlling a significant share, but a pipeline of next-generation compounds and combination therapies promises continued innovation.
  • Patent landscapes are complex, with core patents expiring in the next decade, opening opportunities for generics.
  • Strategic differentiation through new formulations, indications, and safety profiles remains critical for established companies.
  • Close monitoring of patent litigations, patent expiry schedules, and regulatory developments is essential for market participants.

FAQs

1. What are the primary factors driving the growth of SGLT2 inhibitors?
Clinical evidence of cardiovascular and renal benefits, expanding indications, the rising prevalence of T2DM, and evolving treatment guidelines have driven market growth.

2. When are key patents for leading SGLT2 inhibitors expected to expire?
Patents for dapagliflozin and empagliflozin are projected to expire between 2030 and 2035, creating opportunities for generics and biosimilars.

3. How are patent disputes affecting the SGLT2 inhibitors market?
Patent litigations influence market entry timing for generics and biosimilars, impacting pricing, competition, and market dynamics.

4. What innovation trends are observable in the SGLT2 inhibitor pipeline?
Next-generation molecules with improved safety, fixed-dose combination formulations, and new therapeutic indications such as heart failure are key trends.

5. How can pharmaceutical companies extend the lifecycle of SGLT2 inhibitors?
Through obtaining patents for new uses, formulations, combination therapies, and pursuing indications beyond diabetes, companies can prolong exclusivity.

Sources

[1] MarketsandMarkets. "SGLT2 Inhibitors Market by Drug Type, Application, Region – Global Forecast to 2028."
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA approval documents for SGLT2 inhibitors.
[3] Patent databases and legal case summaries concerning key patent expirations and litigations.
[4] Clinical trial repositories demonstrating evolving indications and safety data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.