You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex In Sucrose, and what generic alternatives are available?

Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex In Sucrose is a drug marketed by Hikma and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE is sodium ferric gluconate complex. There are one thousand four hundred and seventy-two drug master file entries for this compound. Two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the sodium ferric gluconate complex profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE?
  • What are the global sales for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE?
Summary for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Drug patent expirations by year for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Recent Clinical Trials for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Watson PharmaceuticalsPhase 1
Watson PharmaceuticalsPhase 4

See all SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE clinical trials

Pharmacology for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hikma SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE sodium ferric gluconate complex INJECTABLE;INJECTION 078215-001 Mar 31, 2011 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose (SFGCS) occupies a specialized niche within the broader hematology and iron deficiency treatment markets. As an intravenous (IV) iron formulation, it addresses iron deficiency anemia, particularly among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing dialysis. Its market trajectory is shaped by evolving healthcare needs, regulatory landscapes, technological advances, and competitive forces, all of which influence its financial outlook.

Market Overview

The global IV iron market is projected to reach approximately $2.5 billion by 2028, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 7%.[1] Sodium ferric gluconate in sucrose is a leading product within this segment, owing to its established efficacy and safety profile. The demand derives primarily from the rising prevalence of anemia associated with CKD, cancer, and other chronic diseases.

Key Market Drivers

  • Increasing Prevalence of Iron Deficiency Anemia: According to WHO, anemia affects about 33% of pregnant women and 25% of non-pregnant women globally, with higher incidence among CKD patients.[2] The increase in CKD prevalence—expected to reach 700 million cases globally by 2040—further fuels demand for IV iron therapies.[3]

  • Shifts Toward Parenteral Iron Over Oral Formulations: Oral iron, though cost-effective, suffers from poor absorption and gastrointestinal side effects, prompting a preference for IV options like SFGCS in hospital settings.[4]

  • Advancements in IV Iron Formulations: Improved safety profiles, reduced infusion times, and better tolerability bolster adoption. For instance, increased availability of newer formulations like ferric carboxymaltose has incrementally challenged traditional agents, pressuring SFGCS's market share but also stimulating overall growth in IV iron utilization.

  • Healthcare Infrastructure Expansion: Growth in dialysis centers, especially in emerging markets, directly correlates with increased SFGCS consumption, given its approval for use in hemodialysis patients.

Regulatory and Clinical Landscape

Regulatory bodies such as the FDA and EMA have approved SFGCS for iron deficiency anemia in CKD patients, underlining its clinical acceptance. However, safety concerns regarding iron overload and hypersensitivity reactions remain key considerations influencing clinical guidelines and procurement decisions.

Market Challenges

  • Competition from Other IV Iron Formulations: Agents like ferric carboxymaltose, iron sucrose, and ferumoxytol compete intensely, offering varying advantages in dosing, safety, and cost.

  • Price Sensitivity: Hospitals and healthcare systems increasingly scrutinize injectable iron costs amidst budget constraints. The pricing strategies adopted by manufacturers strongly influence procurement volumes.

  • Safety and Side Effect Profiles: Although SFGCS has a favorable safety profile, adverse events related to iron overload can hamper market expansion among clinicians cautious about sequencing and dosing protocols.

Pharmaceutical and Financial Trajectory Analysis

Product Lifecycle and Revenue Streams

SFGCS, being a generic formulation with longstanding market presence, is in the maturity phase of its product lifecycle. Revenue streams predominantly derive from existing contracts with healthcare providers, with limited scope for significant growth absent new indications or formulations.

Market Penetration and Adoption

The drug's relatively established position in dialysis centers provides a steady revenue base, with incremental growth as the global CKD burden expands. However, limited innovation and patent expirations render future revenue growth dependent on market share retention and cost-driven market access strategies.

Pricing and Reimbursement Dynamics

Pricing strategies are pivotal; manufacturers often resort to volume-based discounts and formulary negotiations. Reimbursement policies, varying across geographies, significantly impact margins. For instance, countries with bundled dialysis payments may restrict profitability on IV iron sales, pressuring overall financials.

Emerging Markets and Expansion Opportunities

Growing healthcare infrastructure in Asia-Pacific and Latin America offers new avenues. Nevertheless, local regulatory barriers, procurement policies, and competitive landscapes require tailored strategies. Direct engagement with healthcare authorities is critical for expanding SFGCS’s footprint.

Forecasting Future Revenue

Assuming steady utilization growth aligned with rising CKD prevalence, and factoring in market share stability, SFGCS is projected to generate revenues between $300 million and $500 million globally over the next five years. Price erosion and competitive pressures could modulate these figures, emphasizing the importance of strategic positioning.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Innovation and Line Extensions: Developing formulations with reduced infusion times or enhanced safety profiles could invigorate sales.

  • Market Diversification: Exploring indications beyond CKD-associated anemia, such as chemotherapy-induced anemia, can open new revenue channels.

  • Cost Optimization: Streamlining manufacturing and distribution to maintain competitive pricing is essential in a price-sensitive environment.

  • Regulatory Engagement: Navigating approval pathways for biosimilars or new formulations enhances long-term financial stability.

Regulatory and Competitive Outlook

The emergence of biosimilars and newer IV iron agents will intensify competition. Regulatory authorities' evolving standards for safety and interchangeability influence market dynamics, requiring continuous monitoring. Strategic alliances, licensing agreements, and intellectual property management are pivotal for maintaining competitiveness.

Conclusion

Sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose retains a vital role in treating iron deficiency anemia, especially within dialysis settings. Its market is characterized by steady demand driven by rising CKD incidence and healthcare infrastructure expansion. Nonetheless, its long-term financial trajectory faces challenges from competitive formulations, pricing pressures, and regulatory developments. Companies that innovate, optimize pricing, and strategically expand into emerging markets can capitalize on this enduring demand.


Key Takeaways

  • The global IV iron market is poised for sustained growth, with SFGCS positioned as a mature yet stable product.
  • Increasing CKD prevalence and healthcare infrastructure improvements drive steady demand.
  • Competitive pressure from newer formulations necessitates strategic differentiation and cost management.
  • Market expansion opportunities exist in emerging economies and through new indications.
  • Long-term profitability hinges on innovation, regulatory navigation, and strategic alliances.

FAQs

1. What are the primary advantages of sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose compared to other IV iron therapies?
SFGCS offers a favorable safety profile, known efficacy in CKD-associated anemia, and a well-established clinical record. It has relatively shorter infusion times compared to older formulations, facilitating hospital workflow.

2. How does the rising prevalence of CKD affect the market for SFGCS?
The increase in CKD cases escalates demand for IV iron therapies like SFGCS, especially among dialysis patients, providing a stable revenue base and growth opportunities in emerging markets.

3. What are the main competitive threats facing SFGCS in the current market?
Innovative IV iron formulations with improved safety, dosing convenience, or lower cost—such as ferric carboxymaltose and ferumoxytol—pose competitive challenges.

4. How do reimbursement policies influence the financial trajectory of SFGCS?
Reimbursement rates and policies dictate hospital purchasing strategies. Favorable reimbursement enhance margins and market penetration, while restrictive policies can constrain revenue.

5. What future developments could impact the market for SFGCS?
Emergence of biosimilars, new clinical guidelines, and technological innovations in iron delivery could reshape the competitive landscape, influencing both market share and profitability.


References

  1. MarketResearch.com, "Global IV Iron Market Report," 2022.
  2. WHO, "Anaemia," 2021.
  3. GlobalData, "Chronic Kidney Disease Market Overview," 2022.
  4. Patel, M. et al., "Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron treatments in CKD," Kidney International, 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.