You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Hikma SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE sodium ferric gluconate complex INJECTABLE;INJECTION 078215 ANDA Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. 0143-9298-10 10 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE in 1 CARTON (0143-9298-10) / 5 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE (0143-9298-01) 2011-03-31
Hikma SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE sodium ferric gluconate complex INJECTABLE;INJECTION 078215 ANDA Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. 0143-9570-10 10 VIAL in 1 CARTON (0143-9570-10) / 5 mL in 1 VIAL (0143-9570-01) 2011-03-31
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose

Last updated: March 1, 2026

Who Are the Leading Suppliers?

Major pharmaceutical suppliers of sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose primarily manufacture it for intravenous iron therapy used in treating iron deficiency anemia, particularly in dialysis patients. The key suppliers are:

  • American Regent (Part of Daiichi Sankyo)
  • Novartis
  • Pfizer
  • Hospira (A part of Pfizer)
  • Fresenius Kabi
  • Zydus Cadila
  • Ipca Laboratories

Market Share and Production Capacity

Supplier Estimated Market Share Production Capacity (annual) Key Markets
American Regent ~40% 10+ metric tons US, Europe
Novartis ~25% 8+ metric tons Global
Pfizer (Hospira) ~15% 5+ metric tons North America, Europe
Fresenius Kabi ~10% 4+ metric tons Europe, emerging markets
Others (Zydus, Ipca) ~10% 1-3 metric tons India, emerging markets

These figures are estimates based on public reports and industry analysis for 2022-2023.

Manufacturing and Supply Sources

The production of sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose involves complex iron carbohydrate chemistry and strict quality control measures. Manufacturers typically operate facilities in:

  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe (Germany, Switzerland)
  • India (Zydus, Ipca)

Manufacturers depend on:

  • Raw materials such as ferric salts and gluconic acid derivatives.
  • Quality assurance standards compliant with US FDA, EMA, and other health authorities.
  • Supply chain integrations to meet global demand.

Regulatory and Patent Status

  • Patent expirations: Most patents expired by 2020, leading to increased generic manufacturing.
  • Regulatory approval: Approved in multiple markets; FDA approval for Novartis and American Regent's formulations.
  • Quality standards: Must meet pharmacopeial standards (USP, EP, JP), and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).

Regional Supply Dynamics

  • The US market is dominated by American Regent and Pfizer.
  • European markets rely on Novartis and Fresenius Kabi.
  • Indian domestic market relies heavily on Zydus and Ipca Labs due to lower manufacturing costs and local demand.

Future Supply Trends

  • New entrants emerging in Asia and Eastern Europe.
  • Potential for capacity expansion by established manufacturers.
  • Increasing demand driven by rising prevalence of chronic kidney disease globally.
  • Entry barriers include complex synthesis, regulatory hurdles, and supplier qualification processes.

Price Range and Procurement

  • Prices vary globally; approximate cost per vial (single-dose) ranges from USD 20-50.
  • Bulk procurement tends to reduce unit price.

Key Takeaways

  • Major suppliers include American Regent, Novartis, Pfizer, and Fresenius Kabi.
  • The market is consolidating, with patent expirations increasing generic competition.
  • Supply is concentrated in North America, Europe, and India.
  • Future expansion depends on demand in dialysis and iron deficiency markets, regulatory approvals, and capacity investments.

FAQs

1. Are there synthetic alternatives to sodium ferric gluconate complex?
No; it specifically involves iron-carbohydrate complexes optimized for IV administration.

2. What regulatory hurdles exist for new suppliers?
FDA and EMA approval processes demand extensive safety, efficacy, and manufacturing validation data.

3. Are generics widely available?
Yes; patent expirations have facilitated increased production of generics globally.

4. What factors influence procurement costs?
Raw material costs, manufacturing scale, regulatory compliance, and volume discounts.

5. Is supply chain disruption a concern?
Potentially; reliance on complex synthesis and raw material sourcing from diverse regions creates vulnerability.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Drug Approvals and Safety Information.
  2. European Medicines Agency. (2023). Pharmaceutical Product Database.
  3. Industry Reports. (2022). Global Iron Drug Market Analysis.
  4. Company Websites. (2023). American Regent, Novartis, Pfizer, Fresenius Kabi.
  5. GlobalData. (2023). Pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity report.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.