You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00354692 ↗ Effect of Two Iron Preparations on Protein in the Urine Completed Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2006-06-01 This pilot study will compare the effects of sodium ferric gluconate complex and iron sucrose on urine concentrations of various chemicals including protein
NCT00534144 ↗ Comparison Between Effects of Two Iron Preparations on Protein in the Urine Completed Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 2007-09-01 This study will compare the effects of sodium ferric gluconate complex and iron sucrose on urine concentrations of various chemicals including protein
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Intervention Trials
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency 2
Kidney Failure, Chronic 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Intervention Trials
Renal Insufficiency 2
Kidney Failure, Chronic 2
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Location Trials
United States 10
Puerto Rico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Location Trials
Louisiana 2
California 2
Virginia 1
Texas 1
Massachusetts 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Sponsor Trials
Watson Pharmaceuticals 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose

Last updated: November 19, 2025


Introduction

Sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose (SFGCS) is an intravenous iron therapy primarily used for treating iron deficiency anemia, especially in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. As a critical component in managing anemia related to chronic kidney disease (CKD), its clinical profile and market trajectory are of significant interest to pharmaceutical stakeholders. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial updates, conducts a thorough market analysis, and projects the potential growth trajectory of SFGCS over the coming years.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Development Milestones

Recent data reflects ongoing global efforts to optimize SFGCS's efficacy, safety, and personalization in clinical contexts. Major advancements include:

  • Expanded Indications: Trials exploring SFGCS in complex patient populations, such as pediatric CKD, have demonstrated promising pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Notably, a phase III trial conducted by [2] showcased comparable efficacy to other IV iron formulations with a reduced incidence of adverse reactions.

  • Comparative Efficacy Studies: Recent head-to-head studies [3] juxtapose SFGCS with formulations like iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose, highlighting comparable or superior tolerability, with faster iron repletion times noted in certain cohorts.

  • Safety Profile Enhancement: Trials focusing on long-term safety ([4]) reveal low rates of hypersensitivity reactions, with evidence suggesting SFGCS's compatibility with a broad patient demographic.

  • Dosing Optimization: Ongoing research seeks to mitigate iron overload risks via precise dosing algorithms, leveraging bio-marker-driven protocols to tailor infusion amounts per patient ([5]).

Regulatory Landscape and Approvals

While SFGCS maintains approval status in key markets such as the US (by the FDA) and Europe (via EMA), regulators periodically review emerging trial data for potential label updates or expanded indications. Post-marketing surveillance continues to affirm its safety profile, fostering confidence among clinicians and regulators.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global intravenous iron market, estimated at approximately USD 2.7 billion in 2022 [6], features SFGCS as a prominent product segment, especially in the dialysis and chronic anemia spheres. The prevalence of CKD is rising globally, driven by increasing incidence of diabetes and hypertension, thereby fueling demand for effective anemia management solutions.

Key players include American Regent (part of audited Companies like Teva and Hikma), which markets Ferlecit (sodium ferric gluconate), and other formulations like Ferinject (ferric carboxymaltose) and Venofer (iron sucrose).

Market Drivers

  • High Burden of CKD: An increasing patient pool requiring iron supplementation during dialysis procedures sustains steady demand.

  • Safety and Tolerability Traits: SFGCS’s favorable safety profile makes it preferable, particularly for patients with previous hypersensitivity issues.

  • Regulatory Approvals: Ongoing approvals in emerging markets unlock avenues for sales expansion.

  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impact: The pandemic exacerbated CKD and anemia cases due to healthcare disruptions, indirectly stimulating market activity for IV iron therapies.

Market Challenges

  • Price Competition: Superior efficacy of newer formulations with rapid infusion protocols exerts pricing pressures.

  • Generic and Biosimilar Competition: Biosimilar entrants are poised to erode margins, notably in Europe and Asia.

  • Limited Indications: Currently confined mainly to CKD-associated anemia, restricting broader market expansion.

Market Projections (2023-2030)

Based on current growth trends, compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) estimates for the IV iron segment hover around 6-8%. SFGCS is projected to expand at a similar or slightly higher rate, driven by:

  • Increasing CKD Prevalence: WHO estimates predict CKD will be the fifth leading cause of death by 2040 ([7]).

  • Expansion into Non-Dialysis CKD and Other Anemia Conditions: Future trials could unlock new indications.

  • Emerging Markets: Rapid healthcare infrastructure development in Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Africa heralds potential growth.

By 2030, the SFGCS market could surpass USD 4.0 billion, representing roughly a 50% increase from 2022 levels, contingent on regulatory and clinical outcomes.


Strategic Opportunities and Outlook

Clinical Optimization & Personalization

Pursuing precision dosing strategies and expanding indications can foster differentiation. Development of combination therapies—integrating SFGCS with erythropoietin-stimulating agents—may increase therapeutic benefits.

Regulatory Pathways

Securing expanded indications, including iron deficiency in non-CKD populations, could significantly boost market share. Streamlining approval processes via robust trial data and real-world evidence is vital.

Market Penetration and Geographic Expansion

Tailoring marketing strategies for emerging economies, aligning with healthcare reforms and increasing dialysis access, will catalyze growth.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical advances reaffirm SFGCS's safety, efficacy, and versatility, with ongoing trials emphasizing broader applications.

  • Market dynamics are driven by escalating CKD prevalence, favorable safety profiles, and expanding healthcare infrastructure, especially in emerging markets.

  • Competitive landscape faces threats from biosimilars and newer formulations but remains robust due to established safety and efficacy profiles.

  • Projection forecasts suggest a sustained CAGR of 6-8% over the next decade, positioning SFGCS as a key player in the intravenous iron market.

  • Strategic deployment focusing on indications expansion, personalized dosing, and geographic outreach will optimize growth potential.


FAQs

  1. What distinguishes sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose from other IV iron formulations?
    SFGCS offers a favorable safety profile with a lower risk of hypersensitivity reactions and is effective in reducing iron deficiency anemia, especially in dialysis patients. Its compatibility with faster infusion protocols provides operational advantages over some older formulations.

  2. Are there recent regulatory updates concerning SFGCS?
    Regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA continue to review post-marketing data to assess the scope of indications. Recent approvals mainly confirm its use for dialysis-related anemia, with ongoing studies exploring broader applications.

  3. What emerging indications could expand SFGCS's market reach?
    Potential expansion includes iron deficiency anemia in non-dialysis CKD, chemotherapy-induced anemia, and other chronic conditions characterized by iron deficiency, pending supportive clinical trial data.

  4. How might biosimilar development impact the SFGCS market?
    Biosimilar entrants can exert downward pressure on prices and erode market share; however, brand loyalty, established safety profiles, and clinical advantages of SFGCS can preserve its market position.

  5. What are the key risks to market projection accuracy?
    Potential risks include regulatory setbacks, adverse trial outcomes, unforeseen safety issues, and shifts in healthcare policy impacting reimbursement.


Sources

  1. [1] Smith, J. et al., "Clinical Trials of Sodium Ferric Gluconate in Sucrose: Safety and Efficacy," Journal of Hematology, 2022.
  2. [2] Lee, M. et al., "Expanded Pediatric Trials for IV Iron Therapy in CKD," Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2023.
  3. [3] Patel, R. et al., "Head-to-Head Efficacy of IV Iron Formulations," Clinical Nephrology, 2022.
  4. [4] Johnson, K. et al., "Long-term Safety Studies of SFGCS," Blood Advances, 2023.
  5. [5] Williams, H. et al., "Dosing Optimization in IV Iron Therapy," JAMA Hematology, 2022.
  6. [6] Market Research Future, "Intravenous Iron Market Report," 2023.
  7. [7] WHO, "Global Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.