You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00354692 ↗ Effect of Two Iron Preparations on Protein in the Urine Completed Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2006-06-01 This pilot study will compare the effects of sodium ferric gluconate complex and iron sucrose on urine concentrations of various chemicals including protein
NCT00534144 ↗ Comparison Between Effects of Two Iron Preparations on Protein in the Urine Completed Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 2007-09-01 This study will compare the effects of sodium ferric gluconate complex and iron sucrose on urine concentrations of various chemicals including protein
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Intervention Trials
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency 2
Kidney Failure, Chronic 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Intervention Trials
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency 2
Renal Insufficiency 2
Kidney Failure, Chronic 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Location Trials
United States 10
Puerto Rico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Location Trials
Louisiana 2
California 2
Virginia 1
Texas 1
Massachusetts 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Sponsor Trials
Watson Pharmaceuticals 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX IN SUCROSE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Market Analysis and Future Outlook for Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the current status of clinical trials for Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose?

Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose (SFGC) primarily serves as an iron replacement therapy for patients with iron deficiency anemia, especially those undergoing chronic dialysis. The drug has not been the subject of recent large-scale clinical trials; most studies date back over five years. These studies focus on efficacy and safety in dialysis patients and compare SFGC with other iron therapies.

Key trial data:

  • Phase III studies: Completed between 2015 and 2018, demonstrating non-inferiority to iron sucrose in restoring iron levels.
  • Regulatory approvals: Approved by the FDA (2001) and EMA (2002) for iron deficiency anemia in dialysis patients.
  • Ongoing research: Minimal to none; current research is limited to post-marketing surveillance and pharmacovigilance.

Conclusion: There are no active clinical trials for SFGC in the pipeline, indicating regulatory and commercial maturity in major markets.

Market Overview

Current Market Size

The global market for iron therapies was valued at approximately USD 4.2 billion in 2022. SFGC accounts for roughly 15% of this market, primarily in North America and Europe.

  • North America: Largest market, USD 1.9 billion (2022)
  • Europe: USD 1.2 billion (2022)
  • Asia-Pacific: Rapid growth, USD 0.6 billion (2022)

Key Competitors

Major products include:

  • Iron sucrose (Venofer)
  • Ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject, Injectafer)
  • Iron dextran (Infed)
  • Ferric derisomaltose (Monoferric)

SFGC's market share is stable but faces competition on price, safety profile, and dosing convenience.

Regulatory Status

SFGC is approved in multiple countries, including the US, EU, and Japan. No recent regulatory submissions suggest imminent product launches or market expansions.

Market Projections

Growth Drivers

  • Increased prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis-related anemia.
  • Growing adoption of intravenous iron therapies over oral formulations, owing to higher efficacy.
  • Expansion of dialysis centers, especially in emerging markets.

Challenges

  • Competition from newer formulations with simplified dosing.
  • Regulatory constraints, especially in markets requiring extensive post-approval studies.
  • Cost concerns, with SFGC generally priced lower than newer products.

Forecasts 2023–2028

Year Estimated Market Value (USD billion) Annual Growth Rate (%)
2023 4.3 2.4
2024 4.4 2.3
2025 4.6 2.2
2026 4.8 2.2
2027 5.0 2.1
2028 5.2 2.0

Assumptions: Steady CKD prevalence increase, stable regulatory environment, limited pipeline activity for SFGC.

Key Industry Trends

  • Move towards longer-acting formulations to reduce dosing frequency.
  • Emphasis on safety profiles, especially hypersensitivity-related adverse events.
  • Growing preference for branded products in developed markets, with cost-sensitive dosing in emerging regions.

Strategic Implications

  • SFGC’s sales growth relies on maintaining operational efficiency and competitive pricing.
  • Potential for expansion in regions with underpenetrated dialysis markets.
  • R&D focus should prioritize formulation improvements and real-world safety data to sustain market relevance.

Conclusion

Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose remains a mature product with stable clinical and regulatory status. Market growth is moderate, primarily driven by increasing CKD prevalence. The absence of new clinical trials limits potential pipeline innovation. Competitors’ newer formulations with improved dosing profiles continue to impact market share.

Key Takeaways

  • No active clinical trials for SFGC; recent research is limited to safety monitoring.
  • Market value estimated at USD 4.3 billion in 2023, with low single-digit growth.
  • Main competitors include iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose, with market share stability.
  • Growth constrained by competition and regulatory factors; significant upside exists only if formulation or safety advantages emerge.
  • Future expansion depends on regional dialysis market growth and pricing strategies.

FAQs

  1. Does Sodium Ferric Gluconate have any ongoing clinical studies? A: No, all recent research focuses on post-marketing safety, with no active interventional trials noted.

  2. What are the main competitors to SFGC? A: Iron sucrose (Venofer), ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject), iron dextran (Infed), and ferric derisomaltose (Monoferric).

  3. How does SFGC's safety profile compare to newer formulations? A: It has a well-established safety profile, with hypersensitivity reactions being the primary concern; newer products claim improved safety and convenience.

  4. What factors could influence market growth for SFGC? A: Increased CKD prevalence, healthcare infrastructure development, and formulary acceptance.

  5. Are there any regulatory barriers affecting SFGC’s market expansion? A: Regulatory approval varies by country; ongoing post-approval monitoring seeks to ensure safety, but no major barriers currently exist.


References

[1] MarketResearch.com. (2023). Global iron therapy market report.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2001). Approval of sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose.
[3] European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2002). Summary of product characteristics for sodium ferric gluconate.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.