Last Updated: June 6, 2026

CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Chlorpromazine Hydrochloride, and what generic alternatives are available?

Chlorpromazine Hydrochloride is a drug marketed by Actavis Mid Atlantic, Genus, Pharm Assoc, Rubicon, Wockhardt, Abraxis Pharm, Aspiro, Deva Hlding, Dr Reddys, Eugia Pharma, Gland, Hikma, Marsam Pharms Llc, MSN, Thinq Pharm-cro Pvt, Watson Labs, Wyeth Ayerst, Zydus Pharms, Alpharma Us Pharms, Abbott, Alembic, Amneal Pharms Co, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Chartwell Rx, Cycle, Glenmark Pharms Ltd, Ivax Sub Teva Pharms, Kv Pharm, Lannett Co Inc, Lederle, Lupin, Purepac Pharm, Pvt Form, Somerset Theraps Llc, Sun Pharm, Teva Pharms, Upsher Smith Labs, Vangard, West Ward, Zameer Pharms, and Zydus Lifesciences. and is included in seventy-five NDAs.

The generic ingredient in CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE is chlorpromazine hydrochloride. There are twenty-four drug master file entries for this compound. Thirty-four suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the chlorpromazine hydrochloride profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Chlorpromazine Hydrochloride

A generic version of CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE was approved as chlorpromazine hydrochloride by ZYDUS LIFESCIENCES on January 17th, 2020.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE?
  • What are the global sales for CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE?
Recent Clinical Trials for CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Ji Xunming,MD,PhDNA
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FrancePHASE2
Capital Medical UniversityPHASE1

See all CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE clinical trials

Pharmacology for CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Drug ClassPhenothiazine

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Lannett Co Inc CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE chlorpromazine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 212996-004 Jan 22, 2021 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Sun Pharm CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE chlorpromazine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 214256-001 Oct 26, 2020 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE chlorpromazine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 216788-003 Apr 25, 2025 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alembic CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE chlorpromazine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 217350-004 Jul 18, 2023 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Msn CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE chlorpromazine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 214827-003 Jan 27, 2022 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Chlorpromazine Hydrochloride Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory: Pricing, Demand Drivers, Competition, and Exclusivity Outlook

Last updated: May 24, 2026

Chlorpromazine hydrochloride is a long-established, off-patent antipsychotic with global penetration across hospital and institutional use. Market value tracks inflation-adjusted pricing, formulary positioning, and substitution within the phenothiazine and broader antipsychotic classes, with financial performance driven more by supply continuity and tender pricing than by new entrants from product exclusivity.

How big is the chlorpromazine hydrochloride market and who buys it?

The chlorpromazine market is primarily institutional: hospitals, psychiatric inpatient facilities, and specialty pharmacies dispensing under formulary and procurement contracts. Retail demand exists, but the main volume is typically governed by national essential-medicine lists, government tender systems, and hospital procurement cycles.

Primary demand use cases

Chlorpromazine is used across:

  • Acute agitation and psychosis management in inpatient settings
  • Treatment of schizophrenia-spectrum conditions where older antipsychotics remain clinically or cost-preferred
  • Adjunct uses historically including nausea and hiccups in certain clinical settings, subject to country-specific prescribing patterns

Buyer power and tender dynamics

  • Hospital and payer formularies heavily influence utilization.
  • Bulk procurement compresses margins, especially when multiple generic suppliers compete.
  • Short supply disruptions can temporarily lift contracted pricing, but the structural trend is steady downward pricing once supply normalizes.

What drives demand for chlorpromazine hydrochloride in 2024–2029?

Demand drivers are incremental and structural rather than innovation-led.

Clinical inertia vs switching

  • Chlorpromazine has long safety and dosing familiarity in clinician workflows.
  • Switching risk is low where prescribers use it as a default or fallback option.
  • Substitution occurs if lower-cost alternatives win tenders or if newer antipsychotics gain formulary share.

Operational demand

  • Stocking practices in inpatient settings create short-cycle reordering.
  • Stability in supply chains matters more than new product launches.

Regulatory and guideline exposure

  • In markets where antipsychotic treatment guidelines still list older agents as options, chlorpromazine maintains baseline prescribing.
  • Where guidelines shift toward second-generation antipsychotics, chlorpromazine demand trends down but does not collapse because it remains a low-cost option in public systems.

How do chlorpromazine hydrochloride pricing and gross margin evolve after generic entry?

Chlorpromazine is a commodity-like product: price compression follows entry waves and tender repricing.

Typical pricing pattern

  1. Pre-generic period: higher acquisition cost, limited competition.
  2. Generic normalization: sharp decline in list and contract prices.
  3. Ongoing competition: pricing becomes driven by lowest-bid procurement and parallel product availability.

Margin pressure sources

  • Competitive tender pricing
  • Manufacturing scale and input costs
  • Contract renegotiations tied to volumes
  • Inventory and working-capital requirements for distributors

Which generic manufacturers dominate chlorpromazine hydrochloride and how does that shape market share?

The chlorpromazine market is fragmented at the brand level but concentrated around a limited set of large-scale generic manufacturers in many regions. Market share typically follows:

  • Pricing competitiveness in tenders
  • Consistent supply and lead times
  • Stability of product presentations (strengths, pack sizes, formulation type)

Competition effects

  • More suppliers increases SKU coverage and reduces risk for hospitals.
  • When suppliers consolidate or face manufacturing constraints, pricing can rebound briefly.

What is the financial trajectory for chlorpromazine hydrochloride revenue and earnings?

Financial performance generally shows:

  • Revenue stability or low growth in volume terms because the drug remains used.
  • Declining or plateauing revenue per unit due to generic competition.
  • Earnings volatility tied to procurement pricing, supply disruptions, and raw-material cost moves.

Revenue drivers

  • Contracted volumes under institutional purchasing
  • Reordering cycles
  • Inclusion in hospital formularies and essential medicine lists
  • Availability of multiple dosage forms and strengths

Earnings drivers

  • Manufacturing utilization rates
  • Raw-material and conversion costs
  • Distribution margins and reimbursement rules
  • Cost of compliance and pharmacovigilance overhead

How does chlorpromazine hydrochloride compare with competing antipsychotics on cost and uptake?

Chlorpromazine competes in practice against:

  • Other first-generation antipsychotics (phenothiazines and related agents)
  • Lower-cost second-generation antipsychotics where formularies prefer newer options

Competitive positioning

  • Strength: low drug cost and established inpatient protocols
  • Weakness: prescriber preference drift toward second-generation antipsychotics for tolerability and dosing convenience in outpatient settings

Switching patterns

  • Inpatient settings switch less often because acute protocols and historical dosing charts support continuity.
  • Outpatient settings switch more often if payers incentivize newer agents or if generic alternatives offer better tolerability profiles.

What formulation and delivery risks affect market access for chlorpromazine hydrochloride?

Formulation is a key market variable because procurement depends on availability of specific presentations.

Dosage form sensitivity

Hospitals often standardize on:

  • Specific strengths
  • Injection availability (where used)
  • Tablet availability and pack size

If supply constraints occur in one dosage form, utilization shifts to alternatives, which can reduce overall market consumption for chlorpromazine.

Manufacturing and quality

  • Sterility assurance for injectable versions in some jurisdictions
  • Stability profiles for solid oral forms
  • Compliance outcomes influence whether products stay on formularies

When does chlorpromazine hydrochloride lose exclusivity and how does that impact entry?

Chlorpromazine hydrochloride is not a modern exclusivity target in major markets because it is long off-patent. Market structure reflects generic entry and continued competitive repricing rather than single end-of-exclusivity events.

What Orange Book status does chlorpromazine hydrochloride have in the US?

In the US, chlorpromazine hydrochloride is widely represented in generic listings. The practical outcome is that US market access is driven by generic approvals and manufacturing readiness rather than by patent-protected exclusivity for a single product.

Are there Paragraph IV challenges or active patent disputes for chlorpromazine hydrochloride?

For a mature, off-patent molecule, the market dynamic is generally dominated by routine generic competition rather than recurring Paragraph IV litigation cycles around first-time generic entry for a single branded NDA product.

What biosimilar risk applies to chlorpromazine hydrochloride?

No biosimilar framework applies. Chlorpromazine hydrochloride is a small molecule drug, so competition is via generics and authorized generics rather than biosimilars.

How do distribution and procurement systems change chlorpromazine hydrochloride profitability?

Profit depends on channel position:

  • Manufacturers: revenue on ex-factory pricing and contract terms; margin depends on utilization and product mix
  • Wholesalers: inventory carrying and working-capital returns
  • Institutional purchasers: tender-driven price discovery, volume commitments, and rebate structures in some systems

Key commercial mechanics

  • Pharmacy benefit systems and reimbursement rules can shift use between molecules but typically do not restore premium pricing for chlorpromazine
  • Budget impact models favor low acquisition cost, supporting baseline demand
  • Tender cycles can cause periodic demand spikes and restocking

Which regions show the strongest volume and commercial resilience?

Commercial resilience tends to be strongest where:

  • Public sector procurement is extensive
  • Essential medicines programs support older generics
  • Formularies permit older antipsychotics as cost-effective options

Volume weakness appears where second-generation antipsychotics dominate outpatient formularies and switching is payer-incentivized.

What supply constraints or regulatory actions can move chlorpromazine hydrochloride pricing?

Even for off-patent generics, pricing and availability can shift quickly with:

  • Plant outages
  • Sterile manufacturing interruptions (for injectable products)
  • Recalls or quality holds that remove SKUs from tenders
  • Regulatory labeling updates that require repackaging or reformulation

The result is a temporary tightening followed by repricing downward once supply returns and additional SKUs re-enter contracts.

Key Takeaways

  • Chlorpromazine hydrochloride is a mature, off-patent small molecule whose market dynamics are governed by generic competition, institutional procurement, and supply continuity.
  • Financial trajectory is characterized by stable or slowly shifting volumes, with revenue per unit trending down over time as tender pricing reprices.
  • Competition is primarily against other low-cost antipsychotic options; uptake varies by inpatient versus outpatient formulary preferences.
  • The biggest near-term economic levers are contract pricing, inventory stability, and availability of specific dosage forms rather than new exclusivity events.
  • No biosimilar risk exists; market access is determined by generic regulatory approvals and manufacturing execution.

FAQs

1) Does chlorpromazine hydrochloride face generics-driven price erosion in most countries?
Yes. Institutional tender pricing and multi-supplier availability typically drive sustained pressure on unit prices once multiple generics are established.

2) Are injectable chlorpromazine hydrochloride presentations more sensitive to supply disruptions?
Yes. Injectable products can be more vulnerable to manufacturing, sterility, and quality-control interruptions, which can remove SKUs from hospital contracts.

3) How does inpatient demand differ from outpatient demand for chlorpromazine?
Inpatient use is more protocol-driven and less switching-prone, while outpatient use is more influenced by payer formularies and clinical preference shifts toward second-generation options.

4) What tends to happen to chlorpromazine procurement prices after a quality recall is resolved?
Prices can rise temporarily due to reduced SKU availability, then decline after re-entry into tenders and stabilization of supply.

5) Is there meaningful patent strategy for chlorpromazine hydrochloride in commercial planning?
For the molecule itself, commercial planning typically focuses on generic manufacturing, tender participation, and lifecycle management of specific presentations rather than on molecule-level exclusivity.

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/ (accessed 2026-05-24)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.