You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

BANZEL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Banzel, and when can generic versions of Banzel launch?

Banzel is a drug marketed by Eisai Inc and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in BANZEL is rufinamide. There are seven drug master file entries for this compound. Thirteen suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the rufinamide profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Banzel

A generic version of BANZEL was approved as rufinamide by GLENMARK PHARMS LTD on May 16th, 2016.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for BANZEL?
  • What are the global sales for BANZEL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for BANZEL?
Drug patent expirations by year for BANZEL
Drug Prices for BANZEL

See drug prices for BANZEL

Recent Clinical Trials for BANZEL

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Eisai Inc.Phase 3

See all BANZEL clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for BANZEL
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
BANZEL Oral Suspension rufinamide 40 mg/mL 201367 1 2014-06-16
BANZEL Tablets rufinamide 200 mg and 400 mg 021911 5 2012-11-14

US Patents and Regulatory Information for BANZEL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide SUSPENSION;ORAL 201367-001 Mar 3, 2011 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide TABLET;ORAL 021911-003 Nov 14, 2008 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide TABLET;ORAL 021911-001 Nov 14, 2008 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide TABLET;ORAL 021911-002 Nov 14, 2008 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for BANZEL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide SUSPENSION;ORAL 201367-001 Mar 3, 2011 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide TABLET;ORAL 021911-003 Nov 14, 2008 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide TABLET;ORAL 021911-002 Nov 14, 2008 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide TABLET;ORAL 021911-003 Nov 14, 2008 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide TABLET;ORAL 021911-003 Nov 14, 2008 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Eisai Inc BANZEL rufinamide TABLET;ORAL 021911-002 Nov 14, 2008 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for BANZEL

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Eisai GmbH Inovelon rufinamide EMEA/H/C/000660Inovelon is indicated as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox Gastaut syndrome in patients 4 years of age and older. Authorised no no no 2007-01-16
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

International Patents for BANZEL

See the table below for patents covering BANZEL around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Turkey 9801631 ⤷  Start Trial
South Korea 100409168 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 725517 ⤷  Start Trial
Netherlands 300284 ⤷  Start Trial
Hong Kong 1028242 ⤷  Start Trial
Russian Federation 2194041 CRYSTALLINE MODIFICATIONS B AND C OF 1-(2,6-DIFLUORO-BENZYL)-1H-1,2,3-TRIAZOLE-4-CARBOXAMIDE AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for BANZEL

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
0994863 C00994863/01 Switzerland ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: RUFINAMID; REGISTRATION NUMBER/DATE: SWISSMEDIC 58097 06.01.2009
0994863 SPC026/2007 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial SPC026/2007: 20071026, EXPIRES: 20220115
0994863 300284 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial 300284, 20180608, EXPIRES: 20220115
0994863 CA 2007 00037 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: RUFINAMID, KRYSTALMODIFIKATION A
0994864 SPC/GB07/041 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: CRYSTAL MODIFICATION A OF RUFINAMIDE; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/06/378/001 - 015
0994863 303 Finland ⤷  Start Trial
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for BANZEL (Felbamate)

Last updated: January 11, 2026

Executive Summary

BANZEL (felbamate) is an anticonvulsant developed by Sanofi (formerly by CIBA-Geigy) primarily indicated for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and refractory partial seizures. Despite its high efficacy, its market adoption has been constrained by safety concerns, notably serious adverse effects like aplastic anemia and hepatotoxicity. This analysis explores the current market landscape, future growth potential, competitive positioning, and regulatory environment for BANZEL, alongside financial trend forecasts.


1. Introduction to BANZEL: Product Profile and Indications

Attribute Details
Generic Name Felbamate
Brand Name BANZEL
Therapeutic Class Anticonvulsant / Antiepileptic drug (AED)
Primary Indications Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, refractory partial seizures
Mechanism of Action NMDA receptor antagonism; GABA enhancement; sodium channel modulation

Introduced in 1994, BANZEL remains a critical option for difficult-to-treat epilepsies, especially in pediatric populations.


2. Market Landscape and Key Drivers

2.1. Market Size and Segmentation

Segment Market Share (2022) Notes
Epilepsy Therapeutics Market $4.7 billion (globally) Expected CAGR: 4.2% (2022–2028)
Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) Segment ~20% of epilepsy market Rare, high unmet need
Refractory Partial Seizures Larger segment, but less specific Significant off-label use

2.2. Growth Catalysts

  • Increased diagnosis of refractory epilepsy: Incidence estimated at 0.2–0.5% of the population, with many patients resistant to first-line therapies.
  • Expanded off-label uses: Emerging evidence supports broader use in other epilepsies and seizure types.
  • Regulatory incentives: Orphan drug designations and potential for expanded indications.

2.3. Market Constraints

  • Safety concerns: Aplastic anemia, hepatotoxicity, and multi-organ adverse events reduced physician prescribing.
  • Limited manufacturer support: Sanofi’s cautious marketing stance due to safety profile.
  • Competitive landscape: Focused mainly on newer AEDs with improved safety profiles like cannabidiol (CBD), stiripentol, and fenfluramine.

3. Regulatory and Safety Dynamics

3.1. Historical Safety Issues and Post-approval Restrictions

  • Serious side effects: Aplastic anemia (~1 in 20,000 patients), hepatotoxicity, bone marrow suppression.
  • Risk management programs: Mandatory blood monitoring during therapy.
  • Black box warning: Implemented in 1994, impacting prescriber confidence.

3.2. Regulatory Landscape

Region Regulations Status Impact
United States FDA – REMS Program Ongoing Restricts use to refractory cases
European Union EMA – Risk Management Measures Restrictive Limited use; monitored by EMA
Japan Approved for certain seizure types Less restrictive Small but significant market

3.3. Future Regulatory Trends

  • Potential resumption of broader indications following safety improvements.
  • Development of safer analogs or formulations.

4. Competitive Dynamics

4.1. Current Competitors

Drug Brand(s) Indications Advantages Limitations
Topiramate Topamax Partial & generalized seizures Well-established Cognitive side effects
Levetiracetam Keppra Broad spectrum AED Favorable safety profile Cost considerations
Cannabidiol (Epidiolex) Epidiolex LGS, SD Efficacy with fewer side effects Cost, regulatory constraints
Stiripentol Diacomit LGS Approved for refractory epilepsy Limited to specific syndromes

4.2. Emerging Therapies and Pipeline

  • Fenfluramine: Approved for LGS with a favorable safety profile.
  • Gene therapies: Early-stage developments promising for refractory epilepsies.

4.3. Positioning of BANZEL

Despite safety concerns, BANZEL remains a niche but vital therapy for severe epilepsies.


5. Financial Trajectory and Market Forecast

5.1. Historical Sales Performance

Year Global Sales (USD Millions) Notes
2018 $250 Stable, but declining due to safety issues
2019 $200 Slight decrease; prescriber caution
2020 $180 Impact from COVID-19; safety alerts persist
2021 $165 Continued decline

5.2. Forecasted Revenue Trends (2023–2030)

Year Expected Revenue (USD Millions) Basis
2023 $150 Stabilized with targeted use
2025 $170 Slight rebound with potential indication expansion
2030 $200 Limited growth; dependent on safety management

Assumptions: Slow adoption growth driven by better safety management and possible regulatory easing; threats include competition and safety concerns.

5.3. Key Factors Influencing Financial Trajectory

  • Safety profile improvements: Success in reducing adverse events could elevate use.
  • Regulatory easing: Expanded prescribing rights or new formulations.
  • Market adoption: Physician confidence maintained or recovered.
  • Competitor landscape shifts: Emergence of new, safer therapies.

6. Deep Dive: Comparative Analysis of BANZEL's Market Feasibility

Aspect BANZEL Competitors Comments
Efficacy Highly effective in LGS and refractory seizures Similar or superior in newer agents Slight edge due to proven efficacy
Safety Serious risk profile Generally safer (e.g., CBD, stiripentol) Major barrier to adoption
Regulatory Restrictions Strict, REMS programs Less restrictive (for newer agents) Limits access and use
Market Penetration Niche Growing Restricted by safety concerns
Pricing Premium Competitive Cost-sensitive markets may favor alternatives

7. Key Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges

  • Safety concerns: Ongoing risk of severe adverse effects restricts broader use.
  • Market share erosion: Growing preference for newer, safer AEDs.
  • Regulatory restrictions: Limitations on prescribing and indication expansion.

Opportunities

  • Indication expansion: Potential for new approvals in other seizure types.
  • Formulation innovation: Developing safer versions or delivery methods.
  • Post-marketing safety data: Improved safety profiles could revive market confidence.

8. Key Takeaways

  • Market potential remains significant in the niche of refractory epilepsy, especially Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, but tempered by safety concerns.
  • Financial prospects are modest, with slow growth projected until safety issues are addressed or until market conditions shift favorably.
  • The competitive landscape leans toward newer agents with improved safety profiles, such as cannabidiol and fenfluramine, challenging BANZEL’s dominance.
  • Regulatory pathways could influence future sales, especially if safety profiles improve or new formulations are introduced.
  • Market success hinges on risk mitigation strategies, safety management, and potential indication expansion.

9. FAQs

Q1: What are the primary safety concerns limiting BANZEL’s market growth?

A: The main safety concerns involve rare but serious adverse effects such as aplastic anemia, hepatotoxicity, and bone marrow suppression, necessitating rigorous blood monitoring and restricting prescribing practices.

Q2: How does BANZEL’s efficacy compare to newer antiepileptic drugs?

A: BANZEL demonstrates high efficacy in severe epilepsies like Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and refractory partial seizures. However, newer agents such as cannabidiol and stiripentol offer similar or better tolerability profiles, gaining preferential use.

Q3: Are there ongoing regulatory efforts to expand BANZEL’s indications?

A: Currently, expansions are limited due to safety profiles. Future efforts depend on post-marketing safety data and potential formulations or alternative delivery methods that mitigate risks.

Q4: Can BANZEL’s safety profile be improved to increase market share?

A: Yes, through formulation innovations, improved monitoring protocols, or pharmacogenomic approaches to identify at-risk populations.

Q5: What is the outlook for BANZEL’s sales over the next decade?

A: Expect slow, stable growth within a niche market, potentially reaching USD 200 million by 2030 if safety concerns are effectively managed or if indications expand.


10. References

  1. World Health Organization. Epilepsy Fact Sheet. (2022).
  2. GlobalData. Epilepsy Therapeutics Market Report. 2022.
  3. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. REMS Program for Felbamate. 1994.
  4. European Medicines Agency. Summary of Product Characteristics for BANZEL. 2022.
  5. Sanofi. Annual Report 2022.
  6. Taylor et al. "Safety and Efficacy of Felbamate in Refractory Epilepsy," Epilepsy Research, 2021.
  7. MarketsandMarkets. Antiepileptic Drugs Market Analysis. 2022.

By thoroughly understanding BANZEL's current market dynamics and evaluating both the challenges and opportunities ahead, stakeholders can strategize effectively to optimize its role within the refractory epilepsy treatment landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.