Last Updated: May 15, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BANZEL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BANZEL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00334958 ↗ Rufinamide Given as Adjunctive Therapy in Participants With Refractory Partial Seizures Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 3 2006-02-13 To evaluate the effect of rufinamide on total partial seizure frequency in adolescent and adult participants (12 to 80 years, inclusive) with refractory partial onset seizures maintained on a maximum of 3 stable antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BANZEL

Condition Name

Condition Name for BANZEL
Intervention Trials
Epilepsy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BANZEL
Intervention Trials
Seizures 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BANZEL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BANZEL
Location Trials
United States 31
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BANZEL
Location Trials
Massachusetts 1
Maryland 1
Kentucky 1
Kansas 1
Iowa 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BANZEL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BANZEL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BANZEL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BANZEL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BANZEL
Sponsor Trials
Eisai Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BANZEL
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 24, 2026

BANZEL (rufinamide): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2025-2030 Projection

What is BANZEL and what does it treat?

BANZEL is rufinamide, an anti-seizure medicine. It is marketed for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), in combination with other anti-seizure medications. In the US, BANZEL is FDA-approved for LGS in patients 4 years of age and older. BANZEL’s core commercialization profile is therefore tied to the LGS treated population, neurology prescriber behavior, payer coverage decisions, and competing antiseizure branded and generic products.


What is the current clinical-trials landscape for BANZEL?

No complete, audit-ready “current” clinical trials update can be produced from the information available in this chat session. A defensible trials status requires verified records (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov entries with recruitment status, last verified date, and study phase) plus current sponsor activity and trial endpoints. Without that dataset, any “update” would be non-actionable for R&D or investment decisions.


How is BANZEL positioned in the epilepsy market?

BANZEL’s market position is constrained by four structural factors: (1) indication specificity to LGS, (2) neurologist prescribing patterns across polytherapy, (3) competitive pressure from other anti-seizure drugs with broader or overlapping indications, and (4) generic substitution dynamics in older branded categories.

Indication scope (commercial relevance):

  • Primary approved use: seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), add-on therapy.
  • Practical commercial outcome: BANZEL demand correlates with the size of diagnosed LGS patients on polytherapy and the portion of prescribers willing to adopt rufinamide as a regimen component.

Competitive set (how BANZEL competes):

  • Epilepsy is crowded; LGS management includes multiple antiseizure drugs and newer agents targeting specific seizure types and mechanisms.
  • BANZEL’s differentiator in market access is typically driven by clinical profile, tolerability, and formulary placement rather than headline efficacy alone.
  • From a procurement standpoint, payer coverage decisions and step therapy matter as much as clinical results because LGS often requires long-term therapy.

What does the market data imply for BANZEL sales durability?

A projection requires baseline sales, channel mix, geography (US vs EU vs ex-US), and payer dynamics. Those inputs are not present here. Without them, any numbers would be speculative and not suitable for high-stakes decisions.

What can be stated from product structure (without inventing sales):

  • BANZEL’s addressable market is narrower than broad-line antiseizure brands, which caps ceiling growth absent new indications or expanded label.
  • Brand economics in antiseizure categories tend to erode with generic availability, unless the label is protected by formulation or exclusivity extensions and payer policies favor the brand.
  • The main growth levers are LGS patient growth, improved diagnosis rates, and payer-friendly outcomes that reduce discontinuation and switching.

What is the 2025-2030 projection for BANZEL?

A credible 2025-2030 projection requires:

  • a baseline revenue series (at least the last 3 to 5 years)
  • competitive dynamics by geography and formulary status
  • patent/exclusivity status and any line extensions
  • trial pipeline updates that can move label or shift usage patterns

None of these quantified inputs are available in this session. With no verifiable baseline and no trial status feed, a numeric projection would be fabricated.


What patent or exclusivity signals determine BANZEL’s risk profile?

Patent and exclusivity analysis requires specific jurisdictional data: granted patents, expiration dates, pediatric exclusivity, regulatory data protection, and any litigation or settlements. Those datasets are not available in this chat session.

A complete patent risk assessment would include:

  • composition-of-matter coverage expiry in the US/EU
  • any method-of-use patents tied to LGS or dosing regimens
  • patent-term adjustments and supplementary protection certificates (EU)
  • regulatory exclusivity (or lack of it) relevant to rufinamide’s marketed form

No such hard dates are included here, so a technical assessment cannot be completed.


What actions should a business team take based on what can be stated here?

Given the absence of audit-ready clinical and market datasets in this session, the only actionable “next step” is to anchor decisions to verified sources (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov and official regulator/payer datasets) before R&D or investment moves. However, the constraint in this request prevents recommending follow-up inputs.


Key Takeaways

  • BANZEL is rufinamide and is used for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome as combination therapy in the approved population.
  • A current clinical-trials update cannot be produced without verified trial status records.
  • A quantified market projection for 2025-2030 cannot be produced without baseline sales, geography, and payer/competitive inputs.
  • Patent/exclusivity risk cannot be assessed without jurisdiction-specific date records.

FAQs

1) What condition is BANZEL approved to treat?

BANZEL (rufinamide) is approved for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) as add-on therapy.

2) What is BANZEL’s role in epilepsy therapy?

It is an adjunct antiseizure medication used in combination regimens for LGS patients rather than monotherapy.

3) What determines BANZEL market uptake most strongly?

Formulary placement, payer coverage rules, and neurologist prescribing behavior in LGS polytherapy drive uptake more than general epilepsy trends.

4) Can BANZEL gain growth via label expansion?

Label expansion or new clinical evidence tied to new seizure types or populations is a key growth lever, but a current view of feasibility requires verified trial activity.

5) Why can’t a numeric 2025-2030 projection be provided here?

A projection requires an auditable baseline sales series and verified clinical/pipeline and regulatory data; those inputs are not present in this session.


References (APA)

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). BANZEL (rufinamide) prescribing information. FDA.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.