Last Updated: May 10, 2026

AUVI-Q Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Auvi-q patents expire, and when can generic versions of Auvi-q launch?

Auvi-q is a drug marketed by Kaleo Inc and is included in one NDA. There are nine patents protecting this drug.

This drug has one hundred and twelve patent family members in fourteen countries.

The generic ingredient in AUVI-Q is epinephrine. There are twenty-one drug master file entries for this compound. Thirty-two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the epinephrine profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Auvi-q

A generic version of AUVI-Q was approved as epinephrine by BPI LABS on July 29th, 2014.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for AUVI-Q?
  • What are the global sales for AUVI-Q?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for AUVI-Q?
Summary for AUVI-Q

US Patents and Regulatory Information for AUVI-Q

AUVI-Q is protected by nine US patents.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-003 Nov 17, 2017 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-002 Aug 10, 2012 BX RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-001 Aug 10, 2012 BX RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for AUVI-Q

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-001 Aug 10, 2012 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-001 Aug 10, 2012 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-002 Aug 10, 2012 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for AUVI-Q

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
3678649 LUC00378 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: COMBINAISON D'EPINEPHRINE ET DE DODECYLMALTOSIDE, SOUS TOUTES SES FORMES PROTEGEES PAR LE BREVET DE BASE; AUTHORISATION NUMBER AND DATE: EU/1/24/1846 20250211
3678649 2025C/508 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: COMBINATIE VAN EPINEPHRINE EN DODECYLMALTOSIDE, IN ALLE VORMEN BESCHERMD DOOR HET BASISOCTROOI; AUTHORISATION NUMBER AND DATE: EU/1/24/1846 20240823
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

AUVI-Q (epinephrine) market dynamics and financial trajectory

Last updated: April 24, 2026

What is AUVI-Q and where does it sit in the epinephrine auto-injector market?

AUVI-Q is an epinephrine auto-injector indicated for emergency treatment of anaphylaxis. It competes in the branded auto-injector segment against other marketed epinephrine auto-injectors, primarily EpiPen (Mylan/Viatris; brand) and generic or authorized equivalents in various markets.

Core market structure

  • Product category: Prescription epinephrine auto-injectors used for anaphylaxis.
  • Commercial battleground: Price, payer contracting, rebates, patient out-of-pocket design, and channel access (retail pharmacy vs specialty/other distribution).
  • Typical buying behavior: Payers manage spend through contracting and substitution; patients often face affordability constraints that affect adherence and refill behavior.

Commercial implication for AUVI-Q

  • AUVI-Q’s market share and revenue growth track payer coverage outcomes and competitive pricing pressure from EpiPen and authorized/generic alternatives rather than demand expansion alone.

How has competitive pressure shaped AUVI-Q’s market share path?

AUVI-Q has operated under persistent competitive pressure in auto-injectors, where brand incumbents and price-to-coverage differentials drive formulary status.

Key competitive dynamics

  • EpiPen’s incumbent position: EpiPen has long benefited from strong payer coverage and broad retail access, which tends to compress pricing and slow new entrants’ share gains unless payers offer favorable economics for a competitor.
  • Coverage churn risk: Auto-injectors are high-cost items. Small changes in rebate structures can alter formulary positioning quickly.
  • Substitution options: Where authorized equivalents and generics are available, formulary substitution increases.

What this means for AUVI-Q

  • AUVI-Q’s revenue trajectory has been sensitive to whether payers treat it as a preferred alternative, and to the size and structure of rebates demanded to secure or maintain favorable placement.

What do the pricing and reimbursement mechanics imply for financial performance?

Auto-injectors are subject to tight reimbursement controls, with net revenue heavily influenced by rebate and discount policies rather than list price alone.

Net revenue drivers

  • Government and commercial rebate pressure: Formulary access often requires rebates and discounts that reduce gross-to-net conversion.
  • Patient affordability controls: Out-of-pocket caps and copay policies affect volume and refill rates, especially for privately insured and cash-pay switching.
  • Contracting cadence: Annual or semiannual payer contracting cycles can cause step-changes in volume and net sales.

Financial trajectory implication

  • Even if AUVI-Q maintains stable unit demand, net revenue growth is capped when competitors force payers to negotiate down prices or consolidate preference toward a single or dominant option.

Where do AUVI-Q revenues typically come from across channels and geographies?

AUVI-Q is primarily driven by:

  • US retail pharmacy demand for emergency anaphylaxis treatment products.
  • Commercial and managed care coverage that determines uptake.
  • Limited international footprint relative to US scale in many branded drug categories.

Channel concentration effect

  • For products of this type, revenue concentration in one or two large markets increases exposure to payer contracting outcomes and competitive activity.

What has the financial trajectory of AUVI-Q looked like in practice?

AUVI-Q’s financial trajectory has followed the pattern common to branded device-adjacent drugs facing intense competition: growth when coverage improves, then normalization when preferred status is challenged, offset by incremental demand from specific payer segments.

Observed inflection pattern in the class

  • Revenue typically declines or flattens when:
    • competitors improve preferred positioning,
    • payer reimbursement reduces net pricing,
    • substitution increases.
  • Revenue can stabilize when:
    • AUVI-Q is treated as an alternative with acceptable economics,
    • contracts limit direct substitution or require access for cost management.

Actionable read-through for investors and planners

  • AUVI-Q’s medium-term performance is less about clinical differentiation and more about:
    • payer access continuity,
    • net price retention after rebate renegotiations,
    • competitive response timing.

How do manufacturing and distribution factors affect AUVI-Q’s revenue reliability?

Auto-injectors require consistent supply and distribution to maintain patient and payer confidence.

Revenue sensitivity points

  • Supply continuity: Stockouts or allocation can convert formulary demand into lost sales because patients switch to in-stock alternatives.
  • Distribution execution: Pharmacy channel fill rates determine persistence of usage.

Business consequence

  • When supply is stable, AUVI-Q can capture and keep patient demand. When it is not, the product can lose momentum to preferred competitors even if it later restores supply.

What role do regulatory and product lifecycle events play in the financial outlook?

Lifecycle events for AUVI-Q can include:

  • label expansions or changes in indication (direct demand impact),
  • manufacturing and device updates (indirect demand impact via availability),
  • patent and exclusivity status shifts (indirect demand impact through competitive entry).

Lifecycle-to-revenue mechanics

  • Exclusivity/patent pressure: accelerates entry of competitors or authorized equivalents.
  • Regulatory changes: can shift payer and provider behavior, altering demand mix.

How does patent and exclusivity posture shape the competitive timeline and financial runway?

AUVI-Q’s market outlook is shaped by the timetable of:

  • the expiry of key patents or exclusivity protections,
  • the timing of generic or authorized competitive products.

Financial planning implications

  • A credible “runway” for AUVI-Q depends on:
    • what is still protected,
    • whether competitors can enter without infringing,
    • whether payers will move to substitutes when protection ends.

What market dynamics should drive scenario planning for AUVI-Q revenues?

Scenario drivers in the epinephrine auto-injector category generally include:

Payer contracting and preferred status

  • preferred versus non-preferred positioning changes net price and volume.

Competitor pricing and access

  • dominant brand rebates and patient program structures affect switching incentives.

Substitution intensity

  • authorized/generic availability changes the elasticity of demand by formulary.

Policy and reimbursement environment

  • government reimbursement and commercial PBM strategies can accelerate shifts in channel share.

Financial trajectory summary: what the dynamics imply for AUVI-Q

AUVI-Q’s financial trajectory in the epinephrine auto-injector market is governed by coverage and economics, not only by total anaphylaxis incidence. In a category where competitors can lock in payer preference through contracting leverage, AUVI-Q’s revenue path typically exhibits:

  • step-changes around payer contract renewals,
  • plateau or decline when preferred positioning shifts away,
  • fragile stability tied to rebate and supply continuity.

Key Takeaways

  1. AUVI-Q competes in a payer-driven market where revenue is dominated by net pricing outcomes, not list price.
  2. Competitive pressure from incumbent and substitute auto-injectors drives formulary churn, limiting sustained unit and net growth.
  3. AUVI-Q’s financial trajectory is most sensitive to payer contracting, rebate structures, and substitution intensity at retail pharmacy.
  4. Reliability of supply and distribution affects persistence of demand in competitive channels.
  5. Patent and exclusivity milestones define the competitive timeline and shape the product’s revenue runway.

FAQs

1) What primarily determines AUVI-Q revenue in the US market?
Net pricing tied to payer contracts, rebates, and preferred formulary status, plus retail channel execution and substitution behavior.

2) Does AUVI-Q’s clinical value translate directly into revenue growth?
Not automatically. In this category, payer coverage and contracting economics determine whether clinical differentiation converts into sustained unit share.

3) Why do epinephrine auto-injector revenues move in step-changes?
Because payer contracting cycles and rebate renegotiations can rapidly change net price and formulary positioning.

4) How does competition affect AUVI-Q’s financial runway?
Competition accelerates substitution risk and compresses net pricing, reducing growth or triggering declines once payer preference shifts.

5) What operational factor matters most for maintaining AUVI-Q sales?
Supply continuity and pharmacy channel fill rates; stockouts can permanently shift demand to alternatives.


References (APA)

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). AUVI-Q (epinephrine) prescribing information. FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
[2] U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (n.d.). Filings referencing AUVI-Q financial performance and market conditions. SEC EDGAR. https://www.sec.gov/edgar/search/
[3] IQVIA. (n.d.). U.S. immunology and allergy auto-injector market analytics (category-level coverage and share reports). IQVIA. https://www.iqvia.com/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.