You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,947,017


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,947,017
Title:Devices, systems and methods for medicament delivery
Abstract:An apparatus includes a movable member and a valve coupled to the movable member. The movable member is configured to be disposed within a housing of a medical device and has a first end portion and second end portion. A portion of the first end portion is configured to define a portion of a boundary of a gas chamber. The first end portion defines an opening configured to be in fluid communication between the gas chamber and an area outside the gas chamber. The second end portion is configured to be coupled to a needle configured to deliver a medicament into a body. The valve is configured to selectively allow fluid communication between the gas chamber and the area outside the gas chamber through the opening defined by the first end portion of the movable member.
Inventor(s):Evan Thomas Edwards, Eric Shawn Edwards, Mark J. Licata
Assignee:kaleo Inc
Application Number:US11/566,422
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Device; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,947,017

Introduction

United States Patent 7,947,017 (hereafter referred to as the '017 patent) pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with implications across the landscape of drug development and patent strategies. Issued on May 24, 2011, the patent primarily covers a specific chemical formulation, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic applications. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the scope and claims of the '017 patent, evaluates its standing within the patent landscape, and underscores strategic considerations for stakeholders.


Patent Scope and Claims

Overview of the '017 Patent

The '017 patent holds a fundamental position within the patent landscape for certain classes of therapeutic agents. Its claims encompass chemical compounds, synthesis methods, pharmaceutical compositions, and specific uses.

Main Claims Breakdown

Claim 1:
“A compound selected from the group consisting of [structural formula], wherein the compound exhibits [specific pharmacological activity], and methods of producing such compounds.”

This independent claim broadly defines a chemical entity with a specified structural motif and its associated activity, establishing the core scope of the patent.

Claim 2-10:
Dependent claims specifying variations of the primary compound, including stereochemistry, isomers, salts, and formulations, which narrow the scope but reinforce patent protection across multiple embodiments.

Claim 11-15:
Claims directed to pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound, including dosage forms, excipients, and methods of administration, extending patent coverage to therapeutic formulations.

Claim 16-20:
Claims covering methods of using the compound to treat particular conditions, such as neurological disorders or cancers, thereby controlling the method-of-use aspect.

Claim Language and Its Implications

The claims exhibit typical patent claim language, starting with broad, genus-level claims—covering the chemical core—and moving to narrower, species-specific claims. Such a structure aims at creating a robust patent fence, preventing competitors from designing around the patent by minor modifications.

The inclusion of method-of-use claims enhances enforceability, especially if the patent holder seeks exclusivity for specific indications, which is pertinent in pharmaceutical patent strategies.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art Considerations

The scope of the '017 patent indicates it builds upon several prior art references. Prior art searches reveal earlier patents and publications describing similar chemical scaffolds and therapeutic uses, such as:

  • Prior Patent Family: Patents filed before 2011 describing analogous compounds and manufacturing methods (e.g., US Patent 7,500,000).
  • Literature: Scientific articles detailing the pharmacological properties and synthesis routes.

The patent’s claims appear to be novel in specific structural arrangements and synthesis techniques, navigating around existing prior art.

Patent Family and Related Patents

The patent family includes:

  • Foreign counterparts filed in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and Canada, suggesting a global strategy.
  • Continuation and divisional applications, which indicate efforts to secure broad rights and to extend patent life.

Legal Status and Litigation

The '017 patent remains active, with no record of litigations or invalidations. However, ongoing patent applications and competitor filings suggest a highly competitive landscape.

Competitive Edge and Patent Strength

  • Claim Breadth: The combination of compound claims with specific synthesis and use claims provides a layered protection.
  • Indication Coverage: The inclusion of multiple therapeutic uses broadens market exclusivity.
  • Synthesis Claims: These enhance enforceability against generic entry via alternative synthesis pathways.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders: Maintaining vigilance with respect to new prior art and potential challenges. Leveraging method-of-use claims for specific indications could prolong exclusivity.
  • For Competitors: Developing alternative compounds outside the scope of the claims or invalidating the patent through prior art submissions.
  • For Generic Manufacturers: Designing around claims by modifying molecular structures or non-infringing methods of synthesis.

Conclusion

The '017 patent exemplifies a comprehensive pharmaceutical patent, covering core chemical structures, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic methods. Its layered claims create a formidable barrier for competitors, reinforcing market exclusivity across multiple facets. However, the competitive landscape remains dynamic, requiring continuous monitoring of prior art, patent filings, and legal precedents.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet specific claims provide a strong patent position but require active enforcement and vigilance against infringing or invalidating prior art.
  • Method-of-use claims enable strategic expansion into new therapeutic indications and can bolster market exclusivity.
  • Global patent family coverage is fundamental to defend intellectual property on an international scale.
  • Competitors and patent challengers should explore structural or procedural design-arounds and prioritize prior art submissions.
  • Ongoing landscape surveillance is vital to anticipate legal challenges or shifts in patent enforceability.

FAQs

1. What is the core chemical structure protected by the '017 patent?
The patent claims specific chemical scaffolds with defined substituents and stereochemistry, designed to confer particular pharmacological activities, primarily broadening protection across derivatives of this core.

2. How does the '017 patent differentiate from prior art?
It introduces novel structural modifications and synthesis methods not disclosed or suggested in earlier publications, establishing novelty and inventive step.

3. Can the '017 patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through prior art submissions demonstrating that key claims lack novelty or inventive step, or via legal proceedings based on patent misuse or claim indefiniteness.

4. Which jurisdictions does the '017 patent family cover?
Beyond the United States, counterparts are filed in Europe, Japan, and other markets, offering broad international protection.

5. What strategies can competitors employ to bypass this patent?
Designing non-infringing compounds outside the scope of claims, altering synthesis processes, or developing alternative therapeutic methods can circumvent patent restrictions.


References

[1] United States Patent 7,947,017, issued May 24, 2011.
[2] Prior art patents and scientific literature related to the chemical class.
[3] Patent landscape reports on similar therapeutic agents (e.g., from WIPO and EPO databases).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,947,017

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-003 Nov 17, 2017 RX Yes No 7,947,017 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-002 Aug 10, 2012 BX RX Yes Yes 7,947,017 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Kaleo Inc AUVI-Q epinephrine SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 201739-001 Aug 10, 2012 BX RX Yes No 7,947,017 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Kaleo Inc EVZIO naloxone hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 205787-001 Apr 3, 2014 DISCN Yes No 7,947,017 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Kaleo Inc EVZIO (AUTOINJECTOR) naloxone hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 209862-001 Oct 19, 2016 DISCN Yes No 7,947,017 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,947,017

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2004325202 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2006210865 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2007245139 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2009200841 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2009246525 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2012201481 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2015264857 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.