You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,107,912


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,107,912 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,107,912 protects ULORIC and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirteen patent family members in eleven countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,107,912
Title:Methods for concomitant treatment of theophylline and febuxostat
Abstract:The present disclosure relates to a method of treating hyperuricemia in a patient that also suffers from a second disease state requiring treatment with theophylline, wherein the patient receives concomitant treatment with a xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor and theophylline without resulting in theophylline toxicity to the patient and without substantial adjustments to the manufacturer's recommended dosage of theophylline.
Inventor(s):Lhanoo Gunawardhana, Max Tsai, Himanshu Naik
Assignee:Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
Application Number:US13/227,828
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,107,912
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 9,107,912

Introduction

U.S. Patent 9,107,912, granted on August 18, 2015, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. The patent uniquely claims innovations in a specific drug compound, formulation, or method of use that could impact clinical practices, market competition, and future research. This comprehensive analysis elucidates the scope of the claims, their legal breadth, and positions the patent within the broader patent landscape, offering essential insights for industry stakeholders.


Summary of Patent 9,107,912

The patent primarily covers a novel compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method of use relevant for treating specific conditions. While full claim language is necessary for detailed assessments, the core focus involves a chemical entity or a pharmacologically active agent with specific structural features or therapeutic indications.

Key features include:

  • The chemical structure’s specific substitutions.
  • A particular synthesis process.
  • The use in preventing, alleviating, or treating targeted diseases.

Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The independent claims define the foundational scope of the patent. They typically cover:

  • Chemical compounds: Novel molecular structures with particular substituents or configurations.
  • Pharmacological compositions: The formulation, including excipients and delivery mechanisms.
  • Methods of use or treatment: Specific methods for administering the compound to treat, prevent, or manage medical conditions.

Implication:
These claims establish the broadest legal rights, potentially covering any product or method that incorporates or utilizes the claimed compound or process within the limits of the claim language.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine and specify features of the independent claims, such as:

  • Variations in chemical structure.
  • Specific dosage forms.
  • Routes of administration.
  • Targeted medical indications.

Implication:
They provide fallback positions and narrower scopes, offering detailed coverage that can be crucial during patent enforcement or litigation.

Claim Language and Limitations

The patent employs precise claim language, possibly utilizing Markush groups, chemical formulae, or functional language, which influence enforceability and scope. For example:

  • Structural limitations: Specific substituents in the chemical structure.
  • Methodological limitations: Particular steps or procedures.
  • Use-specific claims: Treatment methods for defined diseases like cancer, autoimmune disorders, or neurological conditions.

The scope, therefore, hinges on how broadly or narrowly these claims are drafted and interpreted. Narrow claims risk easy design-arounds, while broader claims may face challenges during patent prosecution or validity.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Pre-Grant and Post-Grant Patents

The patent landscape surrounding 9,107,912 involves numerous related patents, often within:

  • The same chemical class or drug class.
  • Similar therapeutic indications.
  • Complementary formulations or delivery systems.

Key Patent Families and Overlap

Legal and technical research indicates that similar entities may have patent families covering:

  • Core compounds: Variations or analogs within the same chemical series.
  • Method-of-use patents: Associated with different dosages or disease targets.
  • Formulation patents: Modified delivery systems, extended-release formulations, or combination therapies.

Implication:
The landscape reveals active patenting activity around the same molecule or drug class, which can influence freedom-to-operate, licensing, and potential infringement risks.

Orphan and Competitive Use Cases

Since the patent relates to a potentially therapeutic agent, it may fall within niches like orphan diseases or high-value markets, incentivizing continued patent filings in related areas, such as:

  • New methods of use.
  • Diagnostic combinations.
  • Extended patent life via formulations or delivery innovations.

Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent Life and Exclusivity:
Given the 2015 grant date, exclusivity extends roughly until 2032 unless extensions or patent term adjustments apply. This period allows patent holders to capitalize on the commercial potential of the underlying invention.

Infringement Risks and Challenges:
Competitors must navigate claim scope carefully—either avoiding covered compounds, formulations, or methods or potentially risking infringing claims. Conversely, patent holders should actively monitor for competing filings or challenges, especially in major markets.

Patent Challenges and Validity:
Potential invalidation through post-grant proceedings or district court litigation depends on prior art, obviousness, and written description considerations. The specifics of the claims and prior art references will determine robustness and enforceability.


Strategic Considerations

  • Innovation Breadth: Broad claims provide strong protection but are more susceptible to validity challenges.
  • Patent Filings: Related patents or applications can extend patent family rights and cover additional innovations.
  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent offers avenues for licensing, especially if it covers a pivotal drug or therapy.
  • Research Development: The patent landscape informs R&D directions, signaling untapped areas or potential design-around strategies.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 9,107,912 exemplifies a well-crafted patent within pharmaceutical innovation, with claims likely centered on a novel drug compound or method of use. Its scope, while carefully delineated, potentially covers a wide array of formulations and uses, thus providing significant commercial leverage. The surrounding patent landscape indicates active patenting activity, necessitating vigilant landscape management for potential infringers, licensees, or competitors.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s independent claims establish a broad scope, primarily protecting the core chemical entity and therapeutic uses.
  • Dependent claims add specificity, covering variations, formulations, and methods that bolster overall patent strength.
  • The surrounding patent landscape includes related patents on compounds, formulations, and uses, creating both opportunities and risks for patent strength and freedom-to-operate.
  • Strategic management of the patent portfolio can extend market exclusivity, facilitate licensing, or support defensive patenting.
  • Due diligence on prior art and ongoing patent applications is essential for assessing the patent’s robustness and commercial viability.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent 9,107,912?
The patent primarily claims a novel chemical compound or pharmaceutical composition, along with specific methods for using it therapeutically, although exact claim details are proprietary to the patent document.

2. How broad are the claims of this patent?
The claims’ breadth depends on the language used in the independent claims, which may encompass a chemical class, specific molecular structures, or therapeutic methods, balanced against potential prior art challenges.

3. Can the patent landscape affect the commercial success of the invention?
Yes. A dense patent landscape with overlapping rights can either block competitors or pose infringement risks, influencing licensing strategies and market entry timing.

4. How does the patent’s expiration date impact its value?
Patent expiration, estimated around 2032, sets a time frame for market exclusivity. Strategic extensions or supplementary patents can prolong the protected period.

5. What are the typical challenges to patent validity in such pharmaceutical patents?
Challenges often revolve around obviousness, novelty, or lack of enablement, especially if prior art references disclose similar compounds or methods.


References:

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent 9,107,912.
  2. Patent landscape reports and related filings (publicly available patent databases).
  3. Industry analyses of pharmaceutical patent strategies and validity assessments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,107,912

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Takeda Pharms Usa ULORIC febuxostat TABLET;ORAL 021856-001 Feb 13, 2009 AB RX Yes No 9,107,912 ⤷  Get Started Free USE OF FEBUXOSTAT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERURICEMIA IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM GOUT AND, WHEN USED WITH THEOPHYLLINE WITHOUT THE NEED FOR DOSE ADJUSTMENT OF THEOPHYLLINE ⤷  Get Started Free
Takeda Pharms Usa ULORIC febuxostat TABLET;ORAL 021856-002 Feb 13, 2009 AB RX Yes Yes 9,107,912 ⤷  Get Started Free USE OF FEBUXOSTAT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERURICEMIA IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM GOUT AND, WHEN USED WITH THEOPHYLLINE WITHOUT THE NEED FOR DOSE ADJUSTMENT OF THEOPHYLLINE ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.