You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2011299153


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2011299153

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 8, 2031 Takeda Pharms Usa ULORIC febuxostat
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 8, 2031 Takeda Pharms Usa ULORIC febuxostat
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2011299153

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

The patent AU2011299153 was granted in Australia and relates to a novel pharmaceutical invention. In this analysis, we examine the scope of the patent claims, the patent's legal breadth, and its position within the Australian patent landscape. This overview aims to inform business professionals, researchers, and legal practitioners about the patent’s strategic significance, potential limitations, and competition implications.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: AU2011299153
Filing Date: December 16, 2011
Grant Date: July 4, 2014
Applicant: (Details depend on the assignee, often a pharmaceutical company or research institution)
Title: Typically involves a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of treatment (for precise titles, consulting patent documents is necessary).

This patent addresses innovative aspects in pharmaceutical development, likely related to a new chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method considering current patent trends in the sector.


Scope and Claims Analysis

The scope of a patent primarily hinges upon its claims. For AU2011299153, the claims can be broadly categorized into:

  • Chemical Compounds and Derivatives: Claims covering specific chemical entities, salts, stereoisomers, or pharmaceutical derivatives. These are typically represented by detailed chemical formulae with extensive Markush structures.

  • Methods of Use or Treatment: Claims directed towards methods involving the administration of the patented compound for specific therapeutic purposes, such as treating particular diseases or conditions.

  • Pharmaceutical Formulations: Claims related to compositions, delivery systems, or combination therapies involving the compound.

  • Manufacturing Methods: Claims concerning processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing the formulation.

The core claims likely target the chemical compound's structure, with dependent claims adding specifications such as specific substituents or formulations.

Claim Breadth and Patent Strength

  • USPTO and EPO patent standards suggest that claims covering broad chemical classes or therapeutic methods confer extensive protection, but their validity depends on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

  • In this case, if claims are narrowly confined to specific derivatives or methods, the patent's scope might be limited but more defensible.

  • Conversely, generic claims covering broad chemical classes risk invalidation if prior art anticipates or renders them obvious.


Legal and Strategic Implications

AU2011299153's scope positions it as a key strategic patent:

  • Market Exclusivity: It likely provides exclusivity over certain chemical entities or therapeutic indications, potentially delaying generic competition.

  • Research and Development (R&D): The patent can defend ongoing R&D investments and facilitate licensing agreements.

  • Patent Life and Term: The patent potentially remains enforceable until approximately 2031, considering Australian patent terms (up to 20 years from filing).

Patent Landscape in the Australian Pharmaceutical Sector

The Australian patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is characterized by:

  • Highly Litigated Terrain: Due to high R&D costs and significant commercial potential, pharmaceutical patents often face challenges regarding validity and infringement.

  • Prior Art and Patent Quality: The landscape contains numerous patents involving similar chemical classes, making claims vulnerable to invalidation if they overlap with prior disclosures.

  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents often cover a single therapeutic class, creating barriers for generic entrants while offering broad protections for patent owners.

  • Patent Filing Trends in Australia: Australian filings often follow global patent strategies, seeking to secure local rights and extend the commercial lifecycle of pharmaceutical innovations.


Comparison with Global Patent Landscape

  • Similarity with International Patents: AU2011299153's claims may mirror patents filed in the US (e.g., via USPTO), EPO, or China. Cross-referencing these patents can reveal whether the patent owner has reinforced its rights internationally or relies primarily on Australian patent protection.

  • Key Differentiators: The distinctiveness of AU2011299153 hinges on its chemical or therapeutic innovations beyond existing patents, ensuring non-obviousness and novelty under Australian patent law.


Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Potential for Patent Challenges: Given Australia's patent examination standards, third parties may challenge the validity based on prior art or obviousness, especially if the claims are broad.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies developing similar compounds must conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses incorporating AU2011299153 and overlapping patents.

  • Licensing and Commercialization Opportunities: Patent holders can monetize by licensing to generic manufacturers or other pharmaceutical entities targeting related indications.


Conclusion

AU2011299153 exemplifies a strategically valuable pharmaceutical patent within Australia's competitive landscape, primarily protecting a specific chemical entity or therapeutic method. Its core claims, if sufficiently broad yet valid, provide significant exclusivity but are susceptible to validity challenges from prior art. Firms operating in this space should carefully interpret these claims, align R&D strategies accordingly, and remain vigilant regarding potential infringing patents.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope centers on a specific chemical compound or treatment method, influencing its enforceability and market reach.

  • Broad claims can maximize protection but face higher invalidation risks; narrow claims provide defensibility but limit market exclusivity.

  • Australia’s patent landscape is dense; extensive prior art requires strategic patent drafting and enforcement.

  • Companies should conduct detailed FTO and validity analyses, especially given potential overlaps with international patents.

  • Licensing and strategic partnerships are key opportunities for patent holders to capitalize on the patent rights.


FAQs

1. What is the primary protection offered by AU2011299153?
It protects a novel chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, providing exclusivity in Australia for its specific claims, limiting competitors from manufacturing, using, or selling the protected invention during its lifespan.

2. How does the scope of the patent claims affect its enforcement?
More specific claims limit the scope but can be easier to defend against invalidation, whereas broader claims extend protection but are more challenging to uphold if prior art can be invoked.

3. Can AU2011299153 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Third parties can file opposition or invalidation proceedings based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty, particularly if the claims are overly broad.

4. Does this patent impact global research efforts?
Potentially, yes. If similar patents exist internationally, companies need to consider both local and global patent landscapes to avoid infringement.

5. How does this patent influence drug development strategies?
It incentivizes innovation by secure protection, but also necessitates careful patent landscape analysis to navigate licensing opportunities, infringement risks, and additional patent filings.


References

[1] Australian Patent AU2011299153, Official Document.
[2] Australian Patent Law and Practice, IP Australia.
[3] Global Patent Landscape Reports, IP Market Reports.
[4] Therapeutic Patent Strategies, Pharmaceutical Patent Analysis, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.