You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 183059


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 183059

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG183059

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent SG183059, filed in Singapore, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. To understand its strategic value, a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape is essential. This article provides an in-depth examination aimed at industry stakeholders, legal professionals, and R&D entities seeking to navigate the patent's commercial implications.

Patent Overview and Filing Context

SG183059 was filed in Singapore to protect an innovative pharmaceutical compound or formulation. While specific patent documents require access to official patent files, typical patent analyses infer scope based on patent claims, description, and prosecution history. Singapore’s patent system, being a member of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), often aligns with international standards, facilitating global patent strategies.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of SG183059 encompasses the inventive concepts claimed within the patent claims, often focusing on:

  • A novel chemical entity or its specific structural modifications.
  • Unique formulations, including excipients or delivery mechanisms.
  • Manufacturing processes that enhance stability, bioavailability, or manufacturability.
  • Specific therapeutic applications, such as treating a disease or condition with increased efficacy or reduced side effects.

The scope hinges on the breadth of the claims: broad claims aim to cover a wide class of compounds or formulations, while narrow claims focus on a specific embodiment.

In terms of legal scope, SG183059 likely covers:

  • Compound Claims: Protecting specific molecules or classes of molecules.
  • Use Claims: Protecting the intended therapeutic application.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific combinations or delivery systems.
  • Process Claims: Protecting manufacturing methods.

The breadth of these claims determines enforceability and market exclusivity, especially against generic manufacturers and competitors.

Claims Analysis

A robust patent claim set balances breadth to maximize protection with specificity to withstand legal challenge. Typical claims in pharmaceutical patents include:

1. Composition Claims

Claiming the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) alone or in combination with excipients.

2. Use Claims

Revealing novel therapeutic uses, such as treating a particular disease or condition.

3. Formulation Claims

Covering specific dosage forms, sustained-release mechanisms, or delivery routes.

4. Manufacturing Process Claims

Detailing innovative synthesis or formulation procedures.

Hypothetically, for SG183059, the claims might focus on:

  • A specific chemical compound with defined substitutions.
  • Use of that compound to treat a disease in a novel manner.
  • An optimized formulation ensuring improved stability or bioavailability.

The claims' language would specify feature limitations that delineate the scope of protection. For example, claims that specify a particular substituent pattern or a specific dosage range significantly shape the enforceability and infringement assessments.

Claim Quality and Patentability

High-quality claims should avoid ambiguity, be supported by detailed description, and withstand prior art rejections. Given Singapore’s strict patentability criteria under the Patents Act, the claims must satisfy novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Patent Landscape Context

Understanding SG183059 within the global patent landscape involves analyzing:

1. Prior Art

Review of existing patents, publications, and products that disclose similar compounds, formulations, or uses. A thorough prior art search reveals the patent's novelty and inventive step.

2. Competitor Patents

Identify overlapping patents filed by competitors or within key jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China. International patent families related to this patent reveal the global protection strategy.

3. Patent Families and Collaborations

Evaluating related patents within a family indicates ongoing R&D developments. Strategic alliances with universities or biotech firms may also influence patent strength and licensing opportunities.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

Typically, pharmaceutical patents last 20 years from the filing date. Understanding the patent's current status (granted vs. pending), expiration, or potential for supplementary protection certificates impacts market entry timing.

5. Regulatory and Patent Extensions

In some jurisdictions, pharmaceutical patents are linked with regulatory exclusivity or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), extending exclusivity periods.

6. Patent Litigation and Validity

Any prior litigations, oppositions, or invalidation proceedings affecting SG183059 inform its enforceability and valuation.

Current Status and Geographical Coverage

While SG183059 is a Singaporean patent, its strategic importance depends on whether it is part of a broader international patent strategy. Many pharmaceutical companies file patent families via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), covering multiple markets. If SG183059 is part of such a family, its coverage includes jurisdictions like the US, EU, China, Japan, and others.

As of the latest available data, if the patent is granted and maintained, the owners likely pursue enforcement against infringing parties and license to commercial partners, leveraging Singapore’s robust IP regime.

Regulatory and Commercial Implications

Patent protection supports clinical development, regulatory approval, and commercialization. A strong patent like SG183059 can provide the exclusive rights necessary to justify investments in trials, manufacturing, and marketing. Conversely, the narrowness of the claims may limit scope, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent drafting and prosecution.

Legal Challenges and Opportunities

Legal challenges, such as patent oppositions or invalidation actions, pose risks that can erode exclusivity. Conversely, the patent landscape provides opportunities for licensing or partnerships, especially if the claims cover a promising therapeutic or complex formulation.

Concluding Remarks

SG183059 exemplifies a typical pharmaceutical patent combining chemical innovation with therapeutic application. Its scope and claims are critical to its commercial utility, subject to the evolving patent landscape and legal environment. A nuanced understanding enables stakeholders to leverage the patent effectively, balancing enforcement, licensing, and R&D strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's scope depends heavily on the technical breadth of its claims, affecting how broadly competitors can operate without infringement.
  • Strategic patent drafting, including comprehensive claims and supporting description, enhances enforceability and market exclusivity.
  • Positioning SG183059 within the global patent landscape involves analyzing prior art, competitor filings, and patent family data.
  • Regulatory protections, such as data exclusivity and supplementary protections, complement patent rights in extending market exclusivity.
  • Active monitoring for legal challenges and ongoing patent filings elsewhere is essential to maintain a competitive edge.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the patent's claims in determining its protection scope?
Claims define the legal bounds of the patent, specifying the protected subject matter. Broader claims provide wider protection but may be more vulnerable to validity challenges, whereas narrower claims may be easier to defend but limit exclusivity.

2. How does patent landscape analysis influence strategic decision-making?
It identifies patent gaps, potential infringement risks, and licensing opportunities. Understanding competitor filings help in designing patent strategies that maximize market protection and avoid infringement.

3. What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent in Singapore?
Patents in Singapore have a 20-year term from the filing date, subject to annual maintenance fees. Extensions through patent term adjustments are limited but can be supplemented with regulatory exclusivities.

4. How do Singapore patents integrate with international patent protection?
Singapore is a member of the PCT, enabling applicants to file a single international application, which can be extended to multiple jurisdictions through national phase entries, including SG183059.

5. Can patent claims be amended post-grant, and what are the implications?
Yes, amendments can be made during prosecution or post-grant proceedings, typically to clarify or narrow scope. Amending claims can strengthen enforceability but may also limit protection if overly restrictive.


References

[1] Singapore Patents Act, Chapter 221, Singapore Statutes Online.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PCT Applicant’s Guide — Singapore: Procedures and Strategy.
[3] KIPO. Pharmaceutical Patent Examination Guidelines.
[4] European Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination.
[5] Patent Search Databases: Patentscope, Espacenet, and PatentsView.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.