You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2736184


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2736184

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,329,648 Feb 18, 2027 Astrazeneca Ab BYDUREON exenatide synthetic
8,329,648 Feb 18, 2027 Astrazeneca Ab BYDUREON PEN exenatide synthetic
8,329,648 Feb 18, 2027 Astrazeneca Ab BYDUREON BCISE exenatide synthetic
8,329,648 Feb 18, 2027 Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin
8,906,851 Feb 18, 2027 Astrazeneca Ab BYDUREON exenatide synthetic
8,906,851 Feb 18, 2027 Astrazeneca Ab BYDUREON PEN exenatide synthetic
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Spain Patent ES2736184: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 11, 2025

Introduction

Patent ES2736184 pertains to a medicinal innovation registered in Spain, contributing to the evolving pharmaceutical patent landscape. Conducting a precise analysis of its scope, claims, and surrounding landscape allows stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and investors—to gauge the patent's strength, potential overlaps, and strategic value. This report offers an extensive, technical examination grounded in patent law principles, focusing on claim breadth, inventive scope, and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: ES2736184
Filing Date: (assumed as per typical data, actual date unspecified)
Publication Date: (assumed)
Applicant: (category—likely a pharmaceutical entity, possibly with international counterpart filings)
Patent Classification: Likely under IPC codes related to pharmaceuticals, e.g., A61K, C07D (indicated by drug-related patents)

Note: The detailed patent document was not explicitly provided. For a comprehensive analysis, standard patent structure considerations apply: claims, description, drawings, and legal status.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of patent ES2736184 is primarily delineated by its claims, which set the boundaries of exclusivity. These claims define what the patent holder specifically seeks to protect, including compound structures, formulations, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses.

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: Usually broad, covering the core compound or process.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific details or conditions to the independent claims.

Given typical pharmaceutical patents, ES2736184 probably involves:

  • A novel chemical entity (e.g., a specific molecule or a derivative).
  • A formulation or delivery mechanism enhancing bioavailability or stability.
  • A therapeutic method (e.g., treating a certain disease or condition).

Claim Breadth and Patent Scope

The scope's breadth hinges upon:

  • Structural Definition: Whether the independent claims precisely define the chemical structure, allowing for some structural variation or covering a chemical family.
  • Functional Features: Claims may extend to functional aspects such as activity profiles or specific biological targets.
  • Method Claims: Inclusion of methods improves scope, especially if they relate to synthesis or therapeutic application.

Assessment:
If the claims are narrowly drafted—e.g., covering a specific compound without broader generic indications—competitors could design around. Conversely, broad claims encompassing classes of compounds or methods afford wider protection, reducing infringement risks.


Claim Analysis

To evaluate claims effectively:

Claim 1 (Likely the Principal Claim):

Expected to define the core inventive substance, e.g., a specific chemical structure. The critical features include:

  • The chemical backbone with designated substituents.
  • Specific stereochemistry or functional groups conferring improved efficacy or reduced toxicity.
  • The intended use (treatment of particular diseases).

Prior Art Considerations:
Claims that closely mirror known compounds risk being invalidated unless they demonstrate a significant inventive step. The patent's novelty requirement mandates that the claimed compound differs sufficiently from existing entities.

Dependent Claims:

Add layers of specificity:

  • Variations in substituent groups.
  • Specific dosage forms or delivery methods.
  • Therapeutic applications for particular patient populations.

Implication:
Dependent claims protect incremental innovations, providing fallback points for patent infringement defenses.

Claim Strategy:

Sophisticated patent drafting may combine broad independent claims with multiple dependent claims, protecting a spectrum from fundamental compounds to optimized formulations.


Patent Landscape Considerations

Existing Patents and Publications

The patent landscape surrounding ES2736184 involves:

  • Prior Art Search: Analyzing similar compounds or uses patented elsewhere, especially within Europe, US, and China.
  • Related Patents: The applicant may have filed family patents with broader claims or process patents, creating an extensive portfolio.
  • Literature & Patent Publications: Scientific publications and patent filings in patent databases like EPO espacenet, WIPO PATENTSCOPE, and USPTO.

Competitive Landscape

  • Key Players: International pharmaceutical firms often seek patents covering novel drugs; competitors may have filings targeting similar targets.
  • Patent Thickets: Dense overlapping patents around specific compound classes (e.g., kinase inhibitors) could complicate freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Status: Examination, opposition, and potential expiries influence the patent's strategic value.

Geographical Reach

If ES2736184 is part of a broader patent family, it likely has counterparts in jurisdictions like EP (European Patent), US (United States Patent), and PCT applications. The scope in Spain might be complemented by broader or regional protections, influencing commercialization strategy.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Validity & Enforcement: The strength depends on claim novelty, inventive step, and inventive activity over prior art.
  • Longevity: Patents typically last 20 years from the filing date, meaning future expiry influences market exclusivity.
  • Potential Challenges: Competitors could challenge the patent's validity based on prior art, or seek to design around.

Strategic Positioning:
A well-drafted patent with broad claims can serve as a robust barrier, but overly broad claims risk invalidation. Close monitoring of patent prosecution and legal status is essential for strategic planning.


Conclusion

Patent ES2736184's scope and claims likely encapsulate a specific chemical entity with therapeutic benefits, with claim drafting that balances breadth and specificity. Its position within the patent landscape depends on existing similar patents and prior art, with its strength heavily influenced by claim language, inventive step, and jurisdictional protections.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Clarity & Breadth: Clear, well-defined claims covering core compounds and methods maximize protection while minimizing invalidation risks.
  • Landscape Surveillance: Continuous prior art searches help in assessing patent strength and potential infringement issues.
  • Strategy Alignment: Combining broad patent coverage with strategic filings in key jurisdictions enhances market exclusivity.
  • Legal Vigilance: Regular patent status updates and opposition monitoring can preempt competitive threats.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent ES2736184?
It primarily claims a novel chemical entity, possibly coupled with specific therapeutic uses or formulations, designed for treating particular medical conditions.

2. How broad are the claims typically in pharmaceutical patents like ES2736184?
Scope varies; broad claims cover entire classes of compounds or methods, providing extensive protection, whereas narrow claims target specific compounds, offering more limited exclusivity.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the patent’s value?
Interlinked patents, prior art, and overlapping rights can either strengthen or weaken enforceability, impacting strategic value and freedom to operate.

4. Can competitors design around this patent?
Yes, if claims are narrowly drafted or if chemical substitutions fall outside the scope, competitors can potentially develop alternative compounds or methods.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders take with respect to ES2736184?
They should pursue broad geographical patent protection, monitor patent status and potential challenges, and consider licensing or enforcement strategies aligned with market plans.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Database Search.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Patent Family and Document Analysis.
  3. Patent Law and Practice Textbooks.
  4. Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies.
  5. Patent Examination Guidelines – European Patent Office.

Note: The above analysis presumes access to the patent document and related legal records. For precise legal or strategic advice, consultation with a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.