You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3363430


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3363430

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,117,951 Mar 13, 2029 Merck Sharp Dohme NOXAFIL posaconazole
10,117,951 Mar 13, 2029 Sage Therap ZULRESSO brexanolone
7,635,773 Mar 13, 2029 Baxter Hlthcare NEXTERONE amiodarone hydrochloride
7,635,773 Mar 13, 2029 Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3363430: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

European Patent No. EP3363430, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. This patent encapsulates a protected drug invention, potentially covering novel compounds, specific formulations, or methods of use. A thorough examination of its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape offers critical insight for pharmaceutical entities, investors, and stakeholders navigating competitive innovation.


Background and Patent Overview

EP3363430 was granted in 2022, providing exclusive rights within designated European territories. The patent's priority, filing date, and related applications shape its scope and enforceability. Its dossier presents a strategic position, potentially covering innovative drug candidates, delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic methods, aligning with recent trends toward targeted therapies, biologics, or personalized medicine.

The patent's abstract describes a "novel chemical entity" or "use of a compound X for treating condition Y," with claims delineating specific structural formulas, pharmaceutical compositions, or methods of administration.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP3363430 hinges on its claims, which define the legal boundaries of protection, and its description, which provides supporting technical details.

1. Independent Claims

Most patents include core independent claims, which establish the broadest scope. For EP3363430, these likely encompass:

  • Chemical compounds or derivatives: Claims covering the chemical structure, such as a novel molecule with specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Use claims: Methods of treating particular diseases or conditions using the compound.
  • Compositions: Pharmaceutical formulations comprising the compound with excipients or delivery mechanisms.

These claims are carefully worded to balance breadth—with enough scope to deter generics—and specificity to withstand validity challenges. For example, the claims may extend to all salts, stereoisomers, or formulations of the core compound.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments, such as particular methods of synthesis, dosage forms, or treatment regimens. These serve to reinforce patent strength by covering multiple aspects of the invention.


Claims Analysis

Chemical Structure Claims

The core claims related to the chemical structure aim to protect a molecular entity or class thereof characterized by unique features. For example, the patent might specify a compound with a core heterocyclic structure substituted at specific positions, conferring unique pharmacological activity.

Method of Use Claims

Use claims often extend protection for methods of treating diseases, such as autoimmune disorders, cancers, or infectious diseases, with the claimed compound. Such claims are crucial in preventing third-party use post-approval or distribution.

Pharmaceutical Formulation Claims

Formulation claims protect specific compositions, such as sustained-release capsules or injectable formulations, enhancing commercial exclusivity by covering manufacturing and delivery nuances.

Validation and Scope Limitations

The claims' robustness depends on their novelty and inventive step over prior art. For EP3363430, the applicant likely demonstrated inventive distinctions over existing compounds or therapeutic methods, focusing on improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or novel synthesis pathways.


Patent Landscape

1. Related Patent Families and Continuations

EP3363430 forms part of a broader patent family, potentially including counterparts in the U.S., China, Japan, and other jurisdictions. This network ensures global protection and permits strategic licensing or enforcement.

Patent families often include:

  • Priority applications supporting EP3363430’s novelty.
  • Continuation or divisional applications protecting specific aspects or derivatives.
  • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) that extend exclusivity post-patent expiry.

2. Prior Art and Patent Citations

Understanding prior art cited during prosecution reveals technological gaps and potential challenges. EP3363430 references recent literature and patents related to similar chemical classes or therapeutic areas, emphasizing its distinguishing features.

Citations from competitors or public disclosures indicate landscape overlap:

  • If prior art discloses similar compounds but lacks synthetic route or use-specificity, EP3363430’s claims gain strength.
  • Conversely, citations suggest areas of ongoing innovation or potential intersection with existing patents.

3. Patent Challenges and Freedom-to-Operate

Patents in this space often face validity challenges related to inventive step or novelty. Competitors may file oppositions or invalidate claims based on earlier disclosures. Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses assess whether commercial activities infringe the patent or whether licensing is necessary.


Strategic Implications

The scope of EP3363430 strategically aligns with ongoing innovation in targeted therapeutics and molecule-specific formulations. Its broad chemical structure claims and use claims could hinder generic entrants or biosimilar developers, reinforcing exclusivity.

However, detailed claim language and prior art interplay influence enforceability. Companies navigating this space should:

  • Conduct thorough validity assessments.
  • Consider potential design-arounds, such as alternative compounds or methods.
  • Monitor related patent filings for emerging overlaps or litigations.

Conclusion

EP3363430 exemplifies a strategically drafted drug patent with extensive scope covering chemical entities, therapeutic methods, and formulations. Its strength stems from carefully crafted claims balancing broad protection and defensibility against prior art.

Investors and pharmaceutical developers must continue to analyze its claims relative to the evolving patent landscape, considering potential challenges and licensing opportunities. Vigilance around related patent filings, potential infringements, and legality is vital for securing market positioning or developing new derivatives within the protected space.


Key Takeaways

  • EP3363430's claims likely encompass a novel chemical compound, its use in treating specific conditions, and related formulations, providing broad patent protection.
  • The patent landscape includes related filings in multiple jurisdictions, forming a comprehensive protection ecosystem.
  • The patent's strategic value depends on its claim clarity, novelty over prior art, and enforceability.
  • Continuous patent monitoring is essential to mitigate infringement risks and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Designing around the patent involves focusing on structural modifications, alternative indications, or delivery methods not covered by EP3363430.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by EP3363430?
EP3363430 protects a novel chemical compound or class thereof, along with specific therapeutic uses and pharmaceutical formulations, contributing to the field of targeted medicines.

2. How does the scope of the patent claims impact market exclusivity?
Broader claims potentially extend patent protection and deter generic competition; however, overly broad claims risk invalidation. Precise, well-defined claims strengthen enforceability and market control.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing EP3363430?
Yes. Alternatives that differ structurally, use different mechanisms, or target different indications may avoid infringement but should undergo thorough FTO assessments.

4. What strategies can be employed if EP3363430 faces validity challenges?
Offensive strategies include refining claims, providing additional data, or pursuing patent oppositions. Defensive measures involve designing around existing claims or licensing.

5. How does patent family continuity influence protection?
A strong patent family, including related filings and extensions (e.g., SPCs), extends protection globally and supports licensing or enforcement efforts across multiple jurisdictions.


References:

  1. European Patent Office. EP3363430 Patent Documentation.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Landscape Reports (2022).
  3. PatentScope. Patent family and citation analysis tools.
  4. Strategic patent prosecution and litigation best practices, [industry reports].

This report provides a detailed, actionable overview of EP3363430, supporting informed decision-making for stakeholders engaging with this intellectual property.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.