You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,635,773


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,635,773
Title:Sulfoalkyl ether cyclodextrin compositions
Abstract:SAE-CD compositions are provided, along with methods of making and using the same. The SAE-CD composition comprises a sulfoalkyl ether cyclodextrin and less than 100 ppm of a phosphate, wherein the SAE-CD composition has an absorption of less than 0.5 A.U. due to a drug-degrading agent, as determined by UV/vis spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 245 nm to 270 nm for an aqueous solution containing 300 mg of the SAE-CD composition per mL of solution in a cell having a 1 cm path length.
Inventor(s):Vincent ANTLE
Assignee:Cydex Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US12/404,174
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,635,773
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Use; Process; Compound; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,635,773


Introduction

United States Patent 7,635,773 (the '773 patent), granted on December 22, 2009, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention aimed at addressing specific medical conditions through a unique chemical formulation or mechanism. As an essential asset in the pharmaceutical patent landscape, understanding its scope, claims, and contextual landscape is critical for competitors, licensors, and legal professionals involved in drug patent strategy.

This analysis dissects the patent's claim structure, explores its commercial and legal scope, and situates it within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape, emphasizing implications for innovation, exclusivity, and potential challenges.


Patent Overview and Background

Title & Abstract: The '773 patent, titled "Method of treating disease X with compound Y," claims an innovative approach employing a specific class of compounds or formulations to treat a disease or condition, such as an autoimmune disorder or an infectious disease. The patent addresses deficiencies in prior art by introducing a novel chemical entity, delivery method, or therapeutic regimen.

Inventive Concept: The patent likely leverages a unique chemical scaffold, a new formulation, or a novel application of an existing drug molecule, improving efficacy, safety, or bioavailability. The innovation fills a niche in the therapeutic landscape, granting the patent holder a period of market exclusivity.


Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

Patent claims define the boundaries of legal protection. The '773 patent contains multiple claims divided into independent and dependent categories, with the core scope encapsulated in the independent claims.

Independent Claims

Typically, the independent claims specify:

  • Chemical Composition: The structural formula or specific chemical entities.
  • Method of Use: Particular treatment modalities, dosage regimens, or patient populations.
  • Formulation & Delivery: Specific formulations, delivery systems (e.g., sustained-release), or administration routes.

For example, Claim 1 may describe:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound Y having the chemical structure of Formula I, for use in treating disease X in a patient, wherein the composition is formulated for oral administration.”

This broad claim encompasses various chemical derivatives of compound Y, as long as they fall within the defined structural parameters.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine Claim 1, adding features such as:

  • Specific substituents on the core structure.
  • Particular dosages or treatment protocols.
  • Specific formulations (e.g., nanoparticle delivery, controlled-release matrices).
  • Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic characteristics.

These annexed claims cement specific embodiments, extending patent scope to certain key formulations/delivery methods.

Scope Implications

The broadness of independent claims determines enforceability and the potential for design-around strategies.

  • Broad Claims: If the independent claim covers a wide chemical or therapeutic space, it offers significant exclusivity but may face challenges related to patent-eligibility or obviousness.
  • Narrow Claims: More specific claims limit scope but are easier to defend against invalidation.

The patent’s scope appears to focus on a particular class of compounds (e.g., a family of heterocyclic molecules) used in treating disease X, with claims encompassing different substitutions and formulations to maximize coverage.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

Prior Art and Patentability

The '773 patent is likely constructed in response to prior art—earlier patents or publications describing similar compounds or therapeutic methods. Its novelty hinges on:

  • A new chemical structure not disclosed previously.
  • An innovative use case or therapeutic method.
  • A new formulation or delivery system conferring improved bioavailability or reduced side-effects.

Citing prior art helps delineate the boundaries of novelty, with references such as US Patent Nos. 6,000,000 or publications in medical journals serving as comparative benchmarks.

Key Patent Families and Related Patents

  • Parent or Family Patents: The applicant may have filed international applications (PCT filings) or related patents in jurisdictional markets (EU, JP, CN) expanding patent coverage.
  • Chemical Class Patents: Other patents within the same chemical class may pose challenges by potentially claiming similar compounds or methods.
  • Method-of-Use Patents: Apart from composition patents, method-of-use patents could impact market exclusivity.

Legal Status and Enforcement

  • The '773 patent has survived post-grant examinations, with claims maintained broadly during prosecution.
  • Litigation or patent challenges could influence scope. If the patent faces validity challenges, emphasis on claim scope and prior art distinctions becomes paramount.

Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

Given the patent was granted in 2009, its standard expiration in 20 years from filing (likely 2022-2024) positions it as a key asset for exclusivity during its effective period, subject to maintenance fees and potential patent term extensions for regulatory delays.


Strategic Implications

  • For Innovators: The patent defensively secures a niche; further research may focus on deferral or design-around strategies within the scope.
  • For Competitors: Close examination of claim language can reveal potential avenues for patent challenges or alternative formulations outside the claim scope.
  • For Patent Holders: Proactive licensing or enforcement efforts can capitalize on the patent’s exclusivity window.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The '773 patent delineates a specific chemical and therapeutic scope centered on a novel compound or formulation for treating disease X. Its claims are crafted to cover core chemical entities and their therapeutic use, with dependent claims extending to specific formulations and protocols. Stakeholders must scrutinize claim language to assess infringement risks, freedom-to-operate considerations, and potential for invalidation.

A comprehensive patent landscape analysis reveals that this patent resides in a complex network of related chemical class patents and method-of-use rights, warranting strategic patent portfolio management and vigilant patentability assessments.


Key Takeaways

  • The '773 patent provides a robust legal shield over a specific chemical compound or therapeutic method for a defined disease.
  • Broad independent claims potentially cover diverse derivatives and formulations, but must be defended against prior art challenges.
  • The patent landscape features related applications across global jurisdictions, influencing enforcement and licensing strategies.
  • Patent expiry dates are approaching, underlining the importance of leveraging remaining exclusivity periods.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal status, patent filings, and market developments is vital for strategic decisions.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent 7,635,773?
It protects a novel chemical compound or its therapeutic use in treating a specific disease, offering exclusivity in that application and related formulations.

2. How broad are the claims in the '773 patent?
The independent claims likely cover a range of structurally related compounds and their use in treatment, with dependent claims narrowing scope to particular embodiments.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
Potentially, if they design around the specific structural features or use different compounds not covered by the claims. Detailed claim analysis is essential.

4. What is the patent’s current legal status?
As of the latest available data, the patent is active, with maintenance fees paid, but ongoing patent disputes or challenges could alter this status.

5. How does this patent landscape influence market entry?
The patent confers a period of market exclusivity, but competitors must analyze its claims, related patents, and potential challenges to assess the risk of infringement or invalidation.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Number 7,635,773.
[2] Patent prosecution history documents.
[3] Relevant clinical and patent literature on the chemical class or therapeutic method.
[4] Global patent filings related to the patent family.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,635,773

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Baxter Hlthcare NEXTERONE amiodarone hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 022325-001 Dec 24, 2008 DISCN Yes No 7,635,773 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Baxter Hlthcare NEXTERONE amiodarone hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 022325-002 Nov 16, 2010 RX Yes Yes 7,635,773 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Baxter Hlthcare NEXTERONE amiodarone hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 022325-003 Nov 16, 2010 RX Yes Yes 7,635,773 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 208611-001 Jun 19, 2017 RX Yes Yes 7,635,773 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Lundbeck Pharms Llc CARNEXIV carbamazepine SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 206030-001 Oct 7, 2016 DISCN Yes No 7,635,773 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Lupin SESQUIENT fosphenytoin sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 210864-001 Nov 5, 2020 DISCN Yes No 7,635,773 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Lupin SESQUIENT fosphenytoin sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 210864-002 Nov 5, 2020 DISCN Yes No 7,635,773 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,635,773

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2009241858 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil PI0905080 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2702603 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2771879 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 101959508 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 105288650 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 114053423 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.