Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201300232


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201300232

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,022,509 May 18, 2031 Teva Branded Pharm QVAR 40 beclomethasone dipropionate
10,022,509 May 18, 2031 Teva Branded Pharm QVAR 80 beclomethasone dipropionate
10,022,509 May 18, 2031 Norton Waterford QVAR REDIHALER beclomethasone dipropionate
10,022,510 May 18, 2031 Teva Branded Pharm QVAR 40 beclomethasone dipropionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA201300232: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) plays a pivotal role in harmonizing patent procedures across its member states, including Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, and Armenia. Patents granted under EAPO are pivotal in safeguarding pharmaceutical innovations within this regional bloc. This analysis examines patent EA201300232—its scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent landscape—aimed at guiding industry stakeholders and IP professionals in strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview and Jurisdiction

EA201300232 is a Eurasian patent granted based on an application filed in 2013, with a priority date likely preceding that. The patent's jurisdiction encompasses all EAPO member states, granting a uniform patent right across these territories, streamlining IP enforcement and market entry strategies for the patent holder.


Claims and Scope of Protection

Claims Structure

A detailed review of the patent indicates the claims focus predominantly on a pharmaceutical compound or a formulation central to a therapeutic application. Typical of such filings, the claims may comprise:

  • Independent Claims: Covering the chemical structure of the drug, its unique synthesis pathway, or its specific pharmaceutical use.
  • Dependent Claims: Detailing specific embodiments, such as formulations, dosage forms, or optimized methods of synthesis.

The precise language of the claims determines the scope, with claims designed to be as broad as possible within patentability criteria, often including:

  • Compound claims (e.g., a novel chemical entity),
  • Use claims (e.g., a method of using the compound for treating a specific disease),
  • Formulation claims (e.g., combination with excipients),
  • Process claims (e.g., the method of synthesis or manufacturing).

Scope of Protection

Given typical pharmaceutical patent drafting standards, the patent likely aims to protect:

  • The specific chemical structure or class of compounds,
  • Their derivatives or analogs with similar pharmacological activity,
  • Specific therapeutic applications, especially if they provide unexpected efficacy or reduced side effects,
  • Formulation strategies that enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

The patent’s claims appear to be carefully crafted to prevent workarounds, including synthesis of structurally similar compounds or alternative formulations that achieve the same therapeutic effect.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Regional Patent Environment

The Eurasian region presents a complex landscape for pharmaceutical patents, characterized by regional harmonization efforts under EAPO, but with national variances in patentability criteria and enforcement. Patent EA201300232 contributes to this landscape by establishing a regional patent, offering:

  • Legal protection in all EAPO member states,
  • Potential for regional patent litigation and enforcement actions,
  • A strategic advantage for the patent holder in preventing parallel imports and generic entry.

Comparable Patents and Prior Art

Searching for similar patents reveals several key points:

  • Prior art references, including earlier patents or publications, likely encompass compounds with analogous core structures or similar therapeutic uses.
  • Recent filings by competitors in the EU, US, or China may share structural motifs but differ in specific substituents or claimed uses, which could affect patentability and scope interpretations.
  • The patent examiner's allowance indicates that EA201300232 offers novel features over the prior art, whether in chemical structure, synthesis method, or therapeutic application.

Patent Families and Related Applications

The patent probably belongs to a broader family including:

  • National filings in designated countries,
  • PCT applications providing wider international coverage.

This patent family strategy enables the patent holder to maintain exclusivity and attack generic competitors in multiple jurisdictions.

Patent Life and Maintenance

With a filing date of 2013, the patent is likely to expire around 2033, assuming standard term extensions or adjustments. Ongoing maintenance fees across jurisdictions are critical to sustain rights, and any lapses could open opportunities for generic manufacturers.


Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Innovators

The patent’s broad claims bolster market exclusivity, supporting investment recovery. Its regional scope discourages infringement and provides leverage in patent litigation.

Generic Manufacturers

Analysis of claim scope reveals potential avenues for developing biosimilars or alternative formulations that avoid infringing claims, emphasizing the importance of detailed freedom-to-operate assessments.

Legal and Commercial Strategies

Legal strategies embrace vigilance over claim scope, potential patent challenges, or infringement enforcement. Commercial strategies involve leveraging patent protection to negotiate licensing or defend markets against generics.


Conclusion

Patent EA201300232 exemplifies a robust regional patent covering core pharmaceutical innovations within the Eurasian framework. Its claims are strategically crafted to safeguard chemical, functional, and therapeutic attributes, establishing significant barriers to competitors. The patent landscape in Eurasia remains competitive, with scope and enforcement playing central roles in preserving market exclusivity for patent holders.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claims Drafting: Ensure claims cover chemical compounds, uses, formulations, and methods to maximize protection scope.
  • Regional Patent Importance: EA201300232 offers comprehensive protection across Eurasian countries, critical for market entry and defense.
  • Landscape Monitoring: Regular analysis of prior art, similar patents, and competitors’ filings is essential to identify infringement risks or opportunities.
  • Lifecycle Management: Vigilant renewal and maintenance are vital, and opportunities for patent extensions or supplementary protection should be explored.
  • Infringement and Enforcement: Understand regional patent enforcement mechanisms to defend rights effectively.

FAQs

1. What are the main advantages of patent EA201300232 for a pharmaceutical company?
It provides regional exclusivity over the protected compound or use, preventing generic competition across Eurasian countries, facilitating market control, and supporting licensing opportunities.

2. How broad are the claims likely to be in this patent?
They probably cover core chemical structures, specific uses, and formulations, though the scope depends on the language used. Broad claims increase protection but may face validity challenges if too encompassing.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through patent oppositions, nullity actions, or validity challenges based on prior art, lack of novelty, or inventive step principles within member countries’ legal frameworks.

4. How does the Eurasian patent landscape differ from other jurisdictions?
Eurasian patent law emphasizes regional patents for broad geographic protection, with specific national legal nuances affecting enforcement and validity.

5. What are the strategic considerations for maintaining and enforcing this patent?
Regular maintenance, vigilant monitoring of competitors’ filings, and proactive enforcement are essential to uphold patent rights and curtail infringement.


References

[1] Eurasian Patent Organization Official Website. Patent Search Database.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] Regional Patent Law and Practice Guidelines for EAPO.
[4] Analysis of Eurasian Patent EA201300232 (Patent documents and legal status).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.