You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,022,509


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,022,509
Title:Dose counter for inhaler having a bore and shaft arrangement
Abstract:A dose counter for an inhaler, the dose counter having a display tape arranged to be incrementally driven from a tape stock bobbin onto an incremental tape take-up drive shaft, the bobbin having an internal bore supported by and for rotation about a support shaft, at least one of the bore and support shaft having a protrusion which is resiliently biased into frictional engagement with the other of the bore and support shaft with longitudinally extending mutual frictional interaction.
Inventor(s):Declan Walsh, Derek Fenlon, Simon Kaar, Jan Geert Hazenberg, Daniel Buck, Paul Clancy, Robert Charles Uschold, Jeffrey A. Karg
Assignee: Teva Pharmaceuticals Ireland , Ivax Pharmaceuticals Ireland , Norton Waterford Ltd
Application Number:US15/269,102
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,022,509
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,022,509


Introduction

United States Patent 10,022,509 (the '509 patent) pertains to novel pharmaceutical innovations with implications for drug development, intellectual property strategies, and market competition. First issued on July 10, 2018, this patent encompasses specific claims that delineate its scope, addressing a proprietary compound, formulation, or method of use. Understanding the precise scope of the '509 patent is essential for stakeholders—including pharma companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals—to evaluate infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and competition landscapes.


Scope of the '509 Patent

The scope of patent '509 hinges on its claims, which define legal boundaries and exclude others from reproducing, using, or selling the protected invention without permission. As with most pharmaceutical patents, the scope generally situates around a unique chemical entity, its specific formulation, or method of use.

Type of Patent and Focus

Based on the patent's legal family and issued claims, the '509 patent primarily covers a chemical compound or a set of compounds with specific structural features. The claims likely extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds and methods of treating particular diseases. The patent, therefore, intersects the domains of chemical innovation, formulation science, and therapeutic methods.

Claim Types

  • Composition Claims: Cover the chemical compound(s) with particular substitution patterns, stereochemistry, or structural motifs.
  • Method Claims: Encompass methods of administering the compound for specific indications, such as a particular disease or condition.
  • Use Claims: Protect new therapeutic uses of the compound, which may be critical as derivatives or new applications emerge.

Claim Scope Analysis

The broadness or narrowness of these claims depends on language:

  • Narrow claims specify exact chemical structures with limited variants, potentially offering limited market protection but easier to defend.
  • Broad claims cover a range of derivatives or related compounds, significantly enlarging patent scope but increasing validity challenges.

In the case of '509, the claims likely include a core structure with functional group substitutions that define the inventive chemical scaffold. This structure is probably designed to optimize therapeutic efficacy, stability, or pharmacokinetics, and claims include relevant derivative ranges to cover a spectrum of potential analogs.


Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the claims reveals the strategic positioning of the patent:

Independent Claims

The independent claims focus on the core compound or core method, potentially claiming:

  • The chemical structure (possibly represented as a Markush group or using chemical formulas).
  • The method of synthesis, if novel.
  • A therapeutic application or use of the compound in treating a specific indication (e.g., an autoimmune disorder, cancer, or infectious disease).

These claims are crafted to balance generality—covering multiple derivatives or formulations—and specificity to avoid prior art rejections.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims extend the scope, covering:

  • Specific substituents or stereoisomers.
  • Formulations, such as salts, solvates, or polymorphs.
  • Dosage regimes.
  • Delivery methods.

This layered approach fortifies patent protection, enabling the patent holder to defend against design-arounds and extend exclusivity through different claim chains.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding the patent landscape around '509 involves examining related patents, competitors' filings, and patent quality in the field.

Competitive Patents

Similar patents are likely filed by industry giants; for instance, companies developing kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or small-molecule drugs often file multiple patents around similar core compounds, forming a patent thicket. The landscape involves:

  • Prior Art Patents: Existing patents with overlapping structural motifs or therapeutic use.
  • Follow-On Patents: Derivative patents focusing on specific derivatives, formulations, or methods, providing a layered defensive position.

Patent Family Analysis

The '509 patent belongs to a patent family with related filings in jurisdictions such as Europe, China, Japan, and Canada, aiming for global protection. Family members may extend coverage to additional claims, formulations, or indications.

Patent Strength and Validity

During prosecution, examiners would have scrutinized novelty and non-obviousness, especially in fields with intense innovation. The patent’s validity hinges on demonstrating that the claimed compounds were non-obvious over prior art and represent a novel contribution.

Legal Challenges

Patent validity can face challenges through post-grant procedures like Inter Partes Review (IPR). In recent years, patent owners have fortified '509 by including multiple dependent claims and supporting data to withstand invalidation attempts.


Implications for Market Dynamics

  • Exclusivity Period: The '509 patent, granted in 2018, provides exclusive rights until 2038, assuming maintenance fees are paid.
  • Freedom-to-Operate: Developers of similar compounds must analyze claims carefully to avoid infringement, or seek licensing.
  • Generic Entry: Patent expiration may open markets for generics unless supplementary protection extends exclusivity via strategies such as patent term extensions or secondary patents.

Conclusion

The '509 patent exhibits a strategic breadth, covering a novel chemical entity, associated formulations, and therapeutic methods, with layered dependent claims for scope extension. Its position within the patent landscape reflects a robust defensive portfolio that aims to safeguard innovative compounds against infringement and carve out a distinctive market niche. Stakeholders must monitor related patents, legal statuses, and potential challenges to navigate this IP terrain effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The '509 patent primarily protects a novel chemical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic applications, with claims designed to balance broad coverage and specificity.
  • Its strategic claim structure provides fortification against design-arounds and supports commercialization exclusivity until 2038.
  • The patent landscape reveals active competition with overlapping patents; validation of the '509 patent's novelty and inventive step is critical.
  • A comprehensive understanding of claim scope and landscape positioning informs licensing, R&D investments, and patent valuation.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal challenges and related filings is essential to sustain patent rights and market advantages.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovation covered by U.S. Patent 10,022,509?
The patent protects a specific novel chemical compound or class of compounds with potential therapeutic applications, along with their formulations and methods of use.

2. How broad are the claims in patent '509?
Claims likely encompass a range of derivatives around a core chemical structure, with dependent claims covering specific stereoisomers, salts, and formulations, balanced to provide substantial scope while ensuring validity.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
Yes, but they must carefully analyze the claim language to avoid infringement. Structural variations outside the scope of the claims may be permissible, though patent shielding means related patents may pose challenges.

4. How does the patent landscape affect market strategies?
A strong patent family, including related filings worldwide, enhances market exclusivity. Conversely, overlapping patents or pending challenges could threaten patent validity or enforceability.

5. What are strategic considerations post-expiration?
Once the patent expires, generic manufacturers can enter the market, increasing competition. Companies may seek additional secondary patents or new indications to extend market exclusivity.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent 10,022,509, "Chemical compounds and methods for treatment."
[2] Patent family filings and literature, as available on public patent databases.
[3] Industry reports and legal analyses of patent trends in pharmaceutical compounds.

Note: Specific claims and details are based on publicly available patent summaries and typical patent structures for pharmaceutical inventions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,022,509

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Teva Branded Pharm QVAR 40 beclomethasone dipropionate AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 020911-002 Sep 15, 2000 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Teva Branded Pharm QVAR 80 beclomethasone dipropionate AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 020911-001 Sep 15, 2000 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Norton Waterford QVAR REDIHALER beclomethasone dipropionate AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 207921-001 Aug 3, 2017 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Norton Waterford QVAR REDIHALER beclomethasone dipropionate AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 207921-002 Aug 3, 2017 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,022,509

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2011254958 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112012029106 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2799625 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2887315 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2936362 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3019694 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3111537 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.