Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Clopidogrel bisulfate - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for clopidogrel bisulfate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Clopidogrel bisulfate is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Accord Hlthcare, Acme Labs, Actavis Totowa, Alkem Labs Ltd, Amneal Pharms, Ani Pharms, Apotex Inc, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Chartwell Rx, Dr Reddys, Dr Reddys Labs Ltd, Hetero Labs Ltd V, Macleods Pharms Ltd, MSN, Prinston Inc, Puracap Labs Blu, Rising, Sciegen Pharms, Sun Pharm, Sun Pharm Industries, Teva, Torrent Pharms Ltd, Zydus Lifesciences, and Sanofi Aventis Us, and is included in twenty-six NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are forty-five drug master file entries for clopidogrel bisulfate. Thirty-six suppliers are listed for this compound.

Drug Prices for clopidogrel bisulfate

See drug prices for clopidogrel bisulfate

Drug Sales Revenue Trends for clopidogrel bisulfate

See drug sales revenues for clopidogrel bisulfate

Recent Clinical Trials for clopidogrel bisulfate

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Joint Stock Company "Farmak"Phase 1
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineN/A
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityPhase 4

See all clopidogrel bisulfate clinical trials

Pharmacology for clopidogrel bisulfate
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for CLOPIDOGREL BISULFATE
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
PLAVIX Tablets clopidogrel bisulfate 300 mg 020839 1 2009-03-04

US Patents and Regulatory Information for clopidogrel bisulfate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Sanofi Aventis Us PLAVIX clopidogrel bisulfate TABLET;ORAL 020839-001 Nov 17, 1997 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Sciegen Pharms CLOPIDOGREL BISULFATE clopidogrel bisulfate TABLET;ORAL 204165-002 Sep 15, 2014 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Rising CLOPIDOGREL BISULFATE clopidogrel bisulfate TABLET;ORAL 204359-001 Feb 2, 2017 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Ani Pharms CLOPIDOGREL BISULFATE clopidogrel bisulfate TABLET;ORAL 091216-001 May 17, 2012 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Chartwell Rx CLOPIDOGREL BISULFATE clopidogrel bisulfate TABLET;ORAL 202266-002 Nov 20, 2012 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Sciegen Pharms CLOPIDOGREL BISULFATE clopidogrel bisulfate TABLET;ORAL 204165-001 Sep 15, 2014 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Clopidogrel Bisulfate

Last updated: April 20, 2026

What is the Current Market Size and Growth Rate?

The global clopidogrel bisulfate market was valued at approximately USD 5 billion in 2022. It is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 3.8% from 2023 to 2030. The increase aligns with broader trends in cardiovascular disease management.

Regional Distribution:

  • North America: 45% of sales
  • Europe: 30%
  • Asia-Pacific: 15%
  • Rest of the world: 10%

Market Drivers:

  • Rising incidence of ischemic heart disease and stroke
  • Increasing elderly population
  • Growing adoption of antiplatelet therapy

Market Constraints:

  • Patent expiries for key formulations
  • Generic competition reducing prices
  • Concerns over bleeding risks

Patent Status and Implications

The original patent for clopidogrel expired in the United States in 2012, opening the market to generics. Since then, multiple manufacturers have launched equivalent formulations. Brand-name versions like Plavix (manufactured by Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi) faced generic competition, leading to significant price erosion.

Patent Timeline:

  • Original patent expiry in the US: 2012
  • Patent protections in other countries vary, some extending into the early 2020s
  • New formulations and combinations continue to be patented, providing limited periods of exclusivity

Competitive Landscape

The market comprises several key players:

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi (Plavix)
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals
  • Mylan
  • Sun Pharma

Generics account for approximately 70% of global sales, compressing margins for branded products.

Pricing and Reimbursement Trends

Pricing for generic clopidogrel formulations has declined by approximately 50% since patent expiry. Reimbursement policies favor generic substitution, which constrains branded drug revenue.

Reimbursement Policies:

  • In the US, Medicare includes clopidogrel in its formulary with preferred generic status.
  • In Europe, national health systems rapidly adopt cost-saving generics.

R&D and Regulatory Opportunities

Research into new indications, combination therapies, and biosimilars influences market trajectory. Regulatory agencies have approved several new formulations with extended-release profiles or combination pills, which can command premium pricing.

Financial Outlook

Revenue projections indicate:

  • Sale decline for branded formulations post-2012 patent expiry
  • Growth potential for higher-cost, branded, or new formulations
  • Increasing reliance on biosimilars and combination drugs
Forecast: Year Estimated Revenue (USD billion)
2022 5.0
2025 4.8
2030 6.5

The market is expected to recover and grow due to pipeline drugs targeting resistant cases, improved formulations, and combination therapies.

Key Market Dynamics Summary

  • Patent expirations have led to a shift toward generics
  • Price erosion constrains branded product revenues
  • Demographic trends bolster demand for antiplatelet therapy
  • Regulatory pathways for new formulations present growth opportunities

Key Takeaways

  • The global market for clopidogrel bisulfate was USD 5 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 6.5 billion by 2030.
  • Patent expiries have resulted in significant generic competition, reducing pipeline revenues.
  • Reimbursement policies favor generics, constraining branded sales.
  • Innovation in formulations and combination therapies sustains product differentiation and potential premium pricing.
  • Future growth hinges on pipeline development and regulatory approvals for new indications.

FAQs

1. How does patent expiration affect the clopidogrel market?
Patent expiry allows generic manufacturers to enter the market, increasing competition and reducing prices for branded formulations.

2. What are the main revenue drivers for clopidogrel?
Increasing cardiovascular disease prevalence and aging populations drive demand for antiplatelet drugs, although revenue is decreasing for brands due to generics.

3. Are there new formulations of clopidogrel under development?
Yes, regulatory agencies have approved extended-release and combination formulations aimed at improving compliance and therapeutic outcomes.

4. How do reimbursement policies influence market dynamics?
Reimbursement favors lower-cost generics, which suppresses revenues for branded drugs and incentivizes cost-effective prescribing.

5. What is the outlook for biosimilars in this market?
While biosimilars are more relevant for biologics, improvements in formulation and patent strategies may introduce similar cost-saving products for small-molecule drugs like clopidogrel.


References

  1. MarketWatch. (2023). Clopidogrel bisulfate market analysis.
  2. FDA. (2022). Drug patent expiration dates.
  3. IQVIA. (2023). Global pharmaceutical market insights.
  4. European Medicines Agency. (2022). New drug approvals.
  5. Reuters. (2022). Patent and market exit for Plavix.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.