Last Updated: August 9, 2026

PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for promethazine hydrochloride and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Promethazine hydrochloride is the generic ingredient in thirteen branded drugs marketed by Wyeth Ayerst, Abbott, Am Regent, Bedford Labs, Epic Pharma Llc, Hikma, Hospira, Marsam Pharms Llc, Mylan Institutional, Sandoz, Teva Pharms Usa, Watson Labs, Wockhardt Bio Ag, Xgen Pharms, Altana, Pharmobedient, Polymedica, Able, Annora Pharma, Cosette Pharms Nc, Padagis Israel, Sun Pharma Canada, Watson Labs Inc, Usl Pharma, Alpharma Us Pharms, Actavis Mid Atlantic, Cenci, Amneal Pharms, Chartwell Rx, Kv Pharm, Pharm Assoc, Quagen, Strides Pharma, Whiteworth Town Plsn, Ani Pharms, Delcor Asset Corp, Amneal Pharms Ny, Aurobindo Pharma Usa, Chartwell Molecular, Impax Labs, Ivax Sub Teva Pharms, Kvk Tech, Prinston Inc, Pvt Form, Rising, Sun Pharm Inds Inc, Sun Pharm Industries, Tablicaps, Teva, Zydus Pharms Usa, and Bristol Myers Squibb, and is included in eighty-nine NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are eight drug master file entries for promethazine hydrochloride. Forty-six suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
US Patents:0
Tradenames:13
Applicants:51
NDAs:89
Drug Master File Entries: 8
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 46
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 107
Clinical Trials: 67
Patent Applications: 4,462
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE?PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE excipients list
DailyMed Link:PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Montefiore Medical CenterPHASE4
Ji Xunming,MD,PhDNA
Mercy Bon Secours Saint Vincent Medical CenterPHASE3

See all PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE clinical trials

Pharmacology for PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Drug ClassPhenothiazine
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hospira PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE promethazine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 040372-001 Jun 8, 2000 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Strides Pharma PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 040891-001 Mar 13, 2009 AA RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Marsam Pharms Llc PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE promethazine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 089463-001 May 2, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Rising PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE promethazine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 085146-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aurobindo Pharma Usa PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE promethazine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 091054-001 Aug 30, 2011 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Sandoz PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE promethazine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 084176-003 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory (U.S. and Major Markets)

Last updated: July 30, 2026

Promethazine hydrochloride is an off-patent, generic, multi-source antihistamine with broad formulary penetration in allergy, motion sickness, nausea, and preoperative sedation. Market dynamics are driven by generics price competition, supply continuity for older manufacturing routes, and payer preference for low-cost multiples and dosage-form switches (tablets, oral liquids, suppositories, injectables). Financial trajectory in most developed markets tracks “commodity” behavior: stable-to-declining unit growth with pricing compression, punctuated by episodic volatility tied to drug shortages, manufacturing disruptions, or FDA/labeling shifts.

Because promethazine is long generic and widely stocked, the economic outcome is less about patent exclusivity and more about (1) generic cost curves, (2) inventory and shortage risk management, and (3) contracting leverage across institutional, retail, and wholesaler channels.


What drives the promethazine hydrochloride market (pricing, demand, and competition)?

Core demand base. Promethazine hydrochloride is used across multiple indications that keep demand relatively resilient versus niche specialty drugs. Utilization is sustained by:

  • Chronic household and ambulatory use for allergy symptoms and symptomatic antihistamine therapy
  • Episodic but high-volume use for nausea/vomiting and perioperative settings
  • Motion sickness prescribing patterns
  • Long-standing use in emergency and inpatient medicine where clinicians value sedating antihistamines for adjunct symptom control

Multi-pathway substitution pressure. The drug competes against other antihistamines and antiemetics that are also frequently generic (eg, meclizine, dimenhydrinate, diphenhydramine, doxylamine, ondansetron class use for nausea pathways). This drives channel pricing and formulary placement to the lowest-cost equivalent consistent with safety and local protocols.

Pricing dynamics: commodity compression. Promethazine behaves like a generic “backbone” product:

  • Retail pricing trends toward average wholesale price (AWP) declines and tight rebates after multiple AB-rated entries
  • Institutional procurement shifts toward tender-based purchasing where lowest net cost wins
  • Brand-like pricing durability is rare, and margins tighten quickly when additional suppliers enter or a supplier resets supply upward, increasing availability

Featured-snippet answer: The market is dominated by generic tender economics and substitution to other antihistamines/antiemetics; profitability is constrained by rapid price compression and short-term supply disruptions rather than long exclusivity.


How does promethazine hydrochloride compare with alternative generics in antihistamine and antiemetic demand?

Indication overlap drives substitutability. Promethazine’s overlap with:

  • Antiemetic needs (nausea/vomiting, adjunct symptom control)
  • Sedating antihistamine use (allergic symptoms where sedation is acceptable)
  • Motion sickness therapy creates cross-price elasticity with other low-cost therapies.

Where promethazine holds.

  • Settings that specifically use promethazine in protocols for nausea and sedation adjuncts
  • Patient populations where clinicians continue established regimens
  • Institutions with established stocking and standard order sets

Where it loses.

  • When non-sedating alternatives gain formulary share (protocol-driven)
  • When payer formularies prioritize other antiemetic pathways
  • When supply interruptions shift prescribers to available substitutes

Financial impact of substitution. As alternatives compete on net cost, promethazine’s financial trajectory is largely dependent on winning formulary contracts and maintaining consistent supply in injectable and oral liquid forms where substitution friction is higher.


What is the FDA regulatory status of promethazine hydrochloride (ANDA, labeling, and exclusivity signals)?

Promethazine hydrochloride is marketed as a generic active ingredient across multiple dosage forms. For market dynamics, the key point is not exclusivity but ongoing regulatory maintainership across ANDAs/marketed-label holders, including:

  • Ongoing labeling consistency and safety updates
  • Supply-side continuity (manufacturing site qualification, batch release performance)
  • Potential formulation or manufacturing changes that can trigger post-approval regulatory amendments

Featured-snippet answer: The regulatory landscape supports ongoing generic availability. Market entry risk and revenue are more tied to manufacturing continuity and label compliance than to remaining FDA exclusivity.


What is the Orange Book status of promethazine hydrochloride?

Promethazine hydrochloride is broadly available as an AB-rated generic and is not a typical “single-founder” product with a dominant Orange Book exclusivity moat. In business terms:

  • The Orange Book framework mainly reflects multiple generic applicants rather than a narrow patent barrier
  • Revenue capture is spread across multiple manufacturers and dosage strengths
  • Market pricing is determined by procurement and competitive generic pricing, not by exclusivity windows

Featured-snippet answer: Orange Book status is consistent with an off-exclusivity, multi-source generic landscape.


When does promethazine hydrochloride lose exclusivity, and what does that mean commercially?

Promethazine hydrochloride is off exclusivity in practice across developed markets due to age of the product and widespread generic availability. Commercial consequences:

  • No credible “launch protection” period for a new generic entrant
  • New supply is a pricing event, not a value event
  • Incumbents defend share via procurement relationships, reliability of supply, and portfolio depth across dosage forms

Featured-snippet answer: Exclusivity has no meaningful impact on current market revenues; the competitive cycle is driven by generic supply and tender economics.


Which companies supply promethazine hydrochloride and how does supplier concentration affect financial trajectory?

Supplier concentration matters more than in branded markets because:

  • The injectable and oral liquid segments can be sensitive to manufacturing capacity
  • Wholesalers and hospital systems prefer stable supply to avoid substitution and stockouts
  • A temporary supply contraction can lift pricing and margins for remaining suppliers even in an “off-patent” product

Supplier behavior that shapes financial trajectory

  • Multi-site manufacturing and redundant sourcing reduce stockout risk and stabilize sales
  • Portfolio breadth (tablets plus syrup plus suppository plus injectable) increases “share-of-shelf” and institutional preference
  • Contracting with GPOs and wholesalers determines recurring volumes and rebate structures

Featured-snippet answer: Financial trajectory depends on reliability and breadth of supply, with periodic margin spikes when fewer suppliers can meet demand.


What patent estate exists for promethazine hydrochloride and how relevant is it to market profits?

For this drug, patent estate relevance is typically low to investors assessing forward revenue, because:

  • Long off-patent status enables multiple generic entries
  • Pricing and market share are dominated by supply, distribution, and procurement economics
  • Product differentiation is limited; competition is largely price- and availability-driven

Featured-snippet answer: Patent barriers are not a primary driver of current revenues; manufacturing and contracting drive profit outcomes.


What generic entry risks exist for promethazine hydrochloride (manufacturing, quality, and supply chain)?

Generic entry risk is less “legal entry” and more “operational entry”:

  • Ability to source raw materials consistently
  • Scale and robustness of older manufacturing routes
  • Compliance with cGMP and ability to pass batch release
  • Stability in sterile manufacturing for injectable products and preservation/sterility for certain liquid forms

Financial consequences.

  • If capacity expands and supply floods channels, prices compress quickly.
  • If capacity tightens due to plant downtime or regulatory holds, surviving suppliers can realize short-term pricing power.

Featured-snippet answer: The key entry risk is operational continuity; the key value protection is stable supply.


How do dosage forms (tablets vs oral solution vs suppositories vs injections) change revenue exposure?

Revenue exposure is segmented by dosage form in three ways:

  1. Hospital and institutional use skews to injectable and suppository forms where substitution may be slower
  2. Retail use skews to tablets and oral solutions where competitive shelf pricing is intense
  3. Formulation switching can re-route volume to alternative strengths or dosage forms depending on availability

Margin profiles.

  • Injectable and certain oral liquids tend to have higher logistics and compliance costs, raising breakeven thresholds
  • When those forms face supply constraints, margins can improve for the remaining suppliers

Featured-snippet answer: Injectable and oral liquid segments carry more supply-driven margin volatility; tablets show steadier volume with heavier pricing compression.


What litigation or settlement dynamics affect promethazine hydrochloride?

For off-patent multi-source generics, litigation is not typically a sustained revenue determinant. Where litigation occurs, it tends to be:

  • Product-specific quality or labeling disputes
  • Patent challenges for any remaining method-of-use or formulation claims (rare for this established active ingredient)

Featured-snippet answer: Litigation is not a primary driver of market revenues; operational and procurement dynamics dominate.


How do drug shortages and supply interruptions move promethazine hydrochloride financials?

Shortages can cause near-term pricing and volume effects:

  • If a supplier exits temporarily, wholesalers bid up net pricing for available inventory
  • Hospitals may reorder more aggressively if stockouts occur
  • Subsequent normalization can reverse pricing power quickly

Implications for financial trajectory.

  • Year-to-year revenue can show step changes that do not reflect demand growth
  • Gross margin variability tracks capacity availability and freight and raw-material costs

Featured-snippet answer: Financial trajectory is sensitive to supply reliability, with margin spikes during constrained periods and compression after normalization.


How does reimbursement and payer behavior shape long-term demand?

Promethazine is a covered generic in most formularies and is typically positioned as a low-cost symptomatic therapy. Key payer impacts:

  • Preferential listing on lower-tier formularies drives steady baseline demand
  • Prior authorization is uncommon for a generic antihistamine, so demand is generally durable
  • Rebate structures and contract pricing influence manufacturer net revenue more than utilization

Featured-snippet answer: Demand stays stable because reimbursement is broadly available; net revenues are determined by contract and rebate economics.


What is the commercial trajectory outlook for promethazine hydrochloride over the next 3–5 years?

Expected trajectory pattern

  • Unit demand: steady to modestly down/up depending on substitution dynamics among antiemetics and sedating antihistamines
  • Net pricing: downward or flat due to ongoing generic competition
  • Revenue: modest growth is unlikely unless supply-driven price improvements occur or volume shifts favor promethazine over alternatives

Key upside scenarios

  • Sustained shortages for injectable or oral liquid forms due to manufacturing capacity limits
  • Institutional contract awards to reliable suppliers
  • Broadening of inclusion in protocol-based order sets in hospitals

Key downside scenarios

  • Expanded capacity and aggressive tender pricing
  • Substitution to alternative antiemetics that reduce promethazine use in certain clinical protocols
  • Quality-related interruptions that reduce market availability

Featured-snippet answer: The base case is stable units with net price pressure; revenue improvement depends mainly on supply constraints and procurement wins.


Key Takeaways

  • Promethazine hydrochloride is an off-exclusivity, multi-source generic where market economics are driven by generic tender pricing and supply continuity, not patent life.
  • Demand is resilient across multiple symptomatic and institutional use cases, but net revenue is exposed to persistent price compression.
  • Injectable and oral liquid forms show higher margin volatility tied to manufacturing availability and drug shortage risk.
  • Litigation and exclusivity timelines have limited relevance to forward financial performance; operational reliability and contracting determine outcomes.
  • Next 3–5 years: likely steady-to-declining net pricing with revenue stability, punctuated by supply-driven margin and price swings.

FAQs

1) Why does promethazine hydrochloride pricing change even when demand is stable?
Because net pricing for generics is reset by tender cycles, wholesaler bids, rebate structures, and supply constraints rather than by utilization trends.

2) Which promethazine dosage forms tend to be most sensitive to shortages?
Injectables and certain oral liquid presentations, where sterilization, batch release, and stability requirements raise manufacturing bottlenecks.

3) How do hospital formularies typically treat promethazine hydrochloride versus newer antiemetics?
Hospitals often use promethazine in specific protocols or adjunct settings where sedation or cost advantages are valued, but substitution to alternative antiemetic pathways can erode share.

4) What business factors matter most for winning promethazine hydrochloride contracts?
Reliable supply, portfolio depth across strengths and dosage forms, and low net cost through GPO and wholesaler contracting.

5) Does patent expiration meaningfully affect promethazine hydrochloride revenues today?
No; the active ingredient is effectively off exclusivity and already widely generic, so revenue is governed by competitive pricing and operational availability.


References (APA)

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Shortages. FDA.
  3. FDA. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.