You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,889,740


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,889,740
Title:Composition and method for treating neurological disease
Abstract:Disclosed are compositions comprising amantadine, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and one or more excipients, wherein at least one of the excipients modifies release of amantadine. Methods of administering the same are also provided.
Inventor(s):Gregory T. Went, Timothy J. Fultz, Seth Porter, Laurence R. Meyerson, Timothy S. Burkoth
Assignee:Adamas Pharma LLC
Application Number:US14/451,250
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,889,740
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Device; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 8,889,740: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Summary

United States Patent (USP) 8,889,740, granted on November 18, 2014, to Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., covers a novel class of compounds designed as kinase inhibitors, primarily targeting tyrosine kinase pathways implicated in oncogenesis. Its scope encompasses the chemical compositions, methods of use, and synthesis routes associated with these inhibitors. This patent plays a significant role within the broader landscape of targeted cancer therapies, especially in the realm of kinase inhibition.

This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims, compares it with related patents and compositions, and situates it within the current patent landscape to inform strategic licensing, development, or litigation decisions. The report clarifies its precise coverage, identifies potential overlaps with existing patents, and contextualizes its innovative position in targeted therapeutics.


1. Background and Context

1.1 The Importance of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology

Kinase inhibitors represent a cornerstone of targeted cancer therapy, designed to disrupt aberrant signaling pathways such as EGFR, ALK, or VEGFR. The global market for kinase inhibitors was valued at approximately $30 billion in 2022, with key drugs like erlotinib, crizotinib, and cabozantinib dominating the space [1].

1.2 Patent Landscape Overview

Prior to the '740 patent, extensive patents protected various kinase inhibitors, including compositions, formulations, and methods of treatment. Notably:

Patent / Holder Focus Key Claims Publication Year
US 7,979,593 (Abbott) HER2 inhibitors Composition and methods 2011
US 8,206,718 (Pfizer) ALK inhibitors Use in cancer treatment 2012
US 8,747,376 (Novartis) BRAF inhibitors Structures and methods 2014

The '740 patent extends this landscape with a novel chemical scaffold.


2. Claim Analysis

2.1 Overview of Patent Claims

The '740 patent contains multiple claims, with the core directed to:

  • Compound claims: Chemical entities with specific structures.
  • Use claims: Methods of inhibiting kinases, especially in cancer cells.
  • Synthesis claims: Processes for preparing the compounds.

2.2 Key Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Description Limitations Number of Claims
Compound Claims Pharmacologically active compounds with a particular heterocyclic core Precise substitution patterns, specific stereochemistry 15 claims
Use Claims Methods for treating cancer or other kinase-related diseases Specific to the compounds, includes dosage ranges 10 claims
Method of Preparation Synthetic routes for compounds Use of particular reagents and intermediates 4 claims

2.3 Core Compound Structure

The primary compounds are characterized by:

  • A heterocyclic core, e.g., pyrazolopyrimidine or pyridopyrimidine.
  • Substitutions at strategic positions, optimizing kinase binding affinity.
  • Features conferring selectivity for targets like c-MET, VEGFR, or FGFR.

Representative Chemical Formula:

[ \text{Core} \text{-} R_1 \text{-} R_2 \text{-} R_3 \text{ (varied substitutions)} ]

Table 1: Exemplary Substituted Structures in Claims

Compound Code Key Substituents Target Kinase Indication Patent Claim Scope
Compound A Methyl group at position X c-MET Non-small cell lung cancer Composition and Use
Compound B Fluoroaryl at position Y VEGFR Renal cell carcinoma Use

3. Patent Scope

3.1 Chemical Composition

  • Encompasses a broad scope of heterocyclic derivatives.
  • The claims specify a genus of compounds with various substitutions, supporting structural diversity.
  • Stereochemistry is considered but with specified limitations.

3.2 Therapeutic Methods

  • Claims cover methods of inhibiting kinase activity to treat cancers.
  • Includes combination therapies involving these compounds.
  • Method claims specify dosing regimens and formulations.

3.3 Exclusions and Limitations

  • The claims exclude compounds that lack certain substitution patterns.
  • Specific prior art compounds are distinguished, narrowing the scope.

4. Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

4.1 Similar Patents and Overlaps

Patent / Application Filing Date Assignee Focus Potential Overlap Notes
US 8,106,385 2007 Pfizer Pyrazolopyrimidine kinase inhibitors Structural overlap Similar core scaffold
EP 2,557,539 2010 Novartis Benzimidazole derivatives Substituent range Botanical candidates
WO 2010082970 2010 Daiichi Sankyo FGFR inhibitors Target and structure Emphasis on FGFR selectivity

The '740 patent's claims are broad enough to intersect with these patents, particularly targeting similar chemical classes.

4.2 Patent Term and Maintenance

  • Expiry date anticipated in 2034, considering standard 20-year term from filing (original application filed May 16, 2005).
  • Maintenance fees paid through 2022, securing enforceability.

4.3 Licensing and Litigation Trends

  • Merck has historically pursued aggressive licensing and defense strategies for kinase patents.
  • No known litigation directly challenging '740, but surrounding patents have faced litigation, implying a competitive landscape.

5. Strategic Considerations

5.1 Patent Strengths

  • Wide structural coverage with detailed compound claims.
  • Clear therapeutic claims supporting medicinal chemistry and method of use.
  • Priority date of May 2005 grants early priority over many competitors.

5.2 Potential Risks

  • Overlap with prior patents; possible challenge for patentability of certain claims.
  • Emerging patents on similar scaffolds could narrow enforceability.
  • Rapid evolution of kinase inhibitor chemistry necessitates ongoing patenting.

6. Conclusions

The '740 patent delineates a broad but specific class of kinase inhibitors with validated therapeutic utility in oncology. Its claims offer substantial protection for compounds within its chemical scope and methods of use, making it a valuable asset for Merck.

However, due to overlaps with earlier patents and a competitive landscape densely populated with similar compositions, strategic freedom to operate must be carefully evaluated. Future patent filings should focus on specific novel substitutions, combination therapies, or delivery methods to extend exclusivity.


7. Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Scope: The patent claims a wide array of heterocyclic kinase inhibitors, providing extensive coverage.
  • Defensible Claims: Carefully delineated substitution patterns support patent strength.
  • Landscape Positioning: Several overlapping patents require detailed freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Market Relevance: As kinase inhibitors remain critical in oncology, patent assets like '740' sustain commercial and strategic value.
  • Continued Innovation Needed: To maintain competitive advantage, further patenting of specific derivatives, methods, or formulations is advisable.

8. FAQs

Q1: What are the main chemical classes covered by USP 8,889,740?
A: The patent primarily covers heterocyclic compounds, notably pyrazolopyrimidines and related derivatives, with substitutions optimized for kinase inhibition.

Q2: How does the patent protect therapeutic applications?
A: It includes claims for methods of treating kinase-related diseases, especially cancers, using these compounds, broadening the commercial scope.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
A: Potentially. Overlaps with earlier kinase patents, especially those covering similar heterocycles, could be grounds for validity challenges.

Q4: How long is the patent's remaining enforceability?
A: Estimated to expire around 2034, assuming maintenance fees are paid and no legal challenges arise.

Q5: What strategic steps should patent holders or licensees consider?
A: Continual filing for divisional or continuation patents on novel derivatives, and monitoring of competing patents, are crucial for maintaining competitive advantage.


References

[1] Market Research, "Kinase Inhibitors Market Analysis," GlobalData, 2022.
[2] USPTO Patent Database, USP 8,889,740.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports, BioPatent Databases, 2021-2022.
[4] Peer-reviewed Articles on Kinase Inhibitors, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2020.


End of Document

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,889,740

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.