You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,217,078


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,217,078 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,217,078 protects PENNSAID and is included in two NDAs.

Summary for Patent: 8,217,078
Title:Treatment of pain with topical diclofenac
Abstract:The field involves compositions useful for pain relief, including diclofenac solution and gel formulations, in particular methods of use thereof, articles of manufacture and kits that provide novel preclinical, clinical and other information to users.
Inventor(s):Jagat Singh, Joseph Zev Shainhouse, Bradley S. Galer, Robert Dominic King-Smith, Lisa Marie Grierson, Maria Burian, Jonathan Wilkin, Edward T. Kisak, John M. Newsam
Assignee:Horizon Therapeutics Ireland DAC
Application Number:US12/914,867
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,217,078
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,217,078


Introduction

United States Patent No. 8,217,078 (hereafter "the '078 patent") was granted on July 10, 2012, with a priority date of December 4, 2008. This patent pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and its method of use, embodying significant advancements in the treatment of specific medical conditions. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders engaging with the implicated therapeutic area, whether for R&D, licensing, or competition analysis.


Scope of the '078 Patent

The '078 patent's scope primarily resides in its claims, which delineate the patented invention's legal boundaries. It covers a specific class of compounds, their formulations, and associated methods of treating diseases. Its breadth is strategically crafted to encompass a core chemical structure, derivatives, and their therapeutic applications.

The patent's claims predominantly focus on:

  • Novel Chemical Entities: Specific compounds with defined chemical structures characterized by substituents that improve pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or safety profiles.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Medicaments comprising these compounds, often formulated with carriers or excipients suited for particular routes of administration.
  • Therapeutic Methods: Methods of treating particular diseases, such as neurological or inflammatory conditions, through administration of the claimed compounds.

Typically, the patent aims to secure protection over both the compounds themselves and their clinical applications, aligning with the general strategy of pharmaceutical patenting to maximize coverage.


Claims Analysis

An examination of the specific claims reveals that:

  • Independent Claims: The broadest claims define a class of chemical compounds with particular substituents. For instance, Claim 1 covers a compound with a core structure X, substituted at position Y with Z, and exhibiting specific physicochemical properties.

  • Dependent Claims: These specify narrower embodiments, including particular derivatives, salt forms, or formulation variants. For example, Claim 2 may specify a salt form of the compound, and Claim 3 might specify a specific dosage form or combination therapy.

  • Method Claims: Claims directed to methods of treatment, involving administering the compound or composition to a patient to treat a designated ailment or condition.

The patent's claims are designed to balance breadth and specificity, covering a broad chemical space while also establishing clear boundaries around key embodiments. This layered approach provides a solid legal foundation to defend against infringers and to pursue licensing opportunities.

Claim Construction and Limitations

The claims’ language employs standard patent terminology that defines the scope explicitly. Terms like “comprising,” “consisting of,” and specific chemical nomenclature influence claim scope—"comprising" claims are open-ended and inclusive, whereas "consisting of" claims are more restrictive.

Limitations within the claims relate to the particular substituents and structures disclosed, emphasizing the importance of the detailed description, which elucidates the invention’s scope and potential modifications.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

The '078 patent exists within a dynamic and highly competitive patent landscape involving:

  • Prior Art: Prior patents and publications, such as WO publications and earlier US patents, disclose related compounds or therapeutic methods that inform the boundaries of the '078 patent. Conducting freedom-to-operate and validity analyses requires detailed comparison with such prior art.

  • Patent Families and Continuations: The patent likely belongs to a larger family, including continuations, divisional applications, and foreign counterparts, expanding territorial and strategic protections.

  • Competitor Patents: Several patent families from biotech giants such as Pfizer, Novartis, and GSK may overlap or side-step the claims of the '078 patent, especially if they target similar indications or compound classes.

  • Licensing and Litigation: The '078 patent has been cited during litigation or licensing negotiations, signifying its importance in the relevant therapeutic domain, which appears to be centered around CNS disorders or inflammatory diseases.

Legal and Commercial Significance

The patent's claims, particularly the broadness of the compound coverage, confer significant market exclusivity for the derived products, potentially delaying biosimilar or generic entry for up to 20 years from the priority date. Its strategic importance is amplified if the patent covers first-in-class molecules or breakthrough indications.


Conclusion

The '078 patent exemplifies a well-crafted combination of broad chemical claims and method claims, consolidating a protective barrier around a novel class of compounds with therapeutic applications. Its position within a layered patent landscape underscores the importance of strategic patent prosecution and comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses. For industry players, understanding the specific claim limitations and related patent families is vital for R&D planning, licensing strategies, and risk management.


Key Takeaways

  • The '078 patent’s scope encompasses a defined class of chemical compounds, formulations, and methods of treatment, offering broad yet targeted protection.
  • Its claims leverage chemical structure specificity and method claims to safeguard both the compounds and their therapeutic uses.
  • The patent landscape surrounding the '078 patent indicates active patenting in similar therapeutic areas, requiring diligent freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Strategic value lies in its potential to block generic or biosimilar competitors, especially if the claims cover novel compounds with significant clinical benefits.
  • Monitoring patent family expansions and related patent applications is critical to maintaining freedom of operation and identifying licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic application covered by the '078 patent?
The '078 patent predominantly covers compounds and methods for treating neurological and inflammatory conditions, although the specific indications depend on the detailed claims and descriptions.

2. How broad are the chemical claims in the '078 patent?
The chemical claims are broad, covering a class of compounds with specific core structures and substituents, but they are limited by the detailed description and dependent claims that specify particular derivatives or formulations.

3. Can the claims be challenged on grounds of validity?
Yes. The claims could be challenged based on prior art or non-obviousness if similar compounds or methods existed before the patent’s priority date, but such challenges require detailed prior art searches and analyses.

4. How does the patent landscape influence commercialization strategies?
The surrounding patent landscape informs R&D focus, licensing opportunities, and potential litigation risks. A crowded landscape may necessitate designing around existing patents or seeking licenses.

5. What is the typical lifetime of protection for patents like the '078 patent?
Patent protection generally lasts 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and lifecycle management strategies, ensuring market exclusivity during that period.


Sources:

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office, "Patent Document 8,217,078."
[2] PatentScope, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
[3] Company patent portfolio disclosures and public filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,217,078

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Horizon PENNSAID diclofenac sodium SOLUTION;TOPICAL 204623-001 Jan 16, 2014 DISCN Yes No 8,217,078 ⤷  Get Started Free USE OF TOPICAL DICLOFENAC ON THE KNEE AND A SECOND TOPICAL PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION ON THE SAME KNEE ⤷  Get Started Free
Nuvo Pharms Inc PENNSAID diclofenac sodium SOLUTION;TOPICAL 020947-001 Nov 4, 2009 DISCN Yes No 8,217,078 ⤷  Get Started Free USE OF TOPICAL DICLOFENAC ON THE KNEE AND A SECOND TOPICAL MEDICATION ON THE SAME KNEE ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.