You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 200907940


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 200907940

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,166,181 Jun 30, 2029 Azurity TRIPTODUR KIT triptorelin pamoate
10,166,181 Jun 30, 2029 Verity TRELSTAR triptorelin pamoate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent ZA200907940: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in South Africa

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

Patent ZA200907940 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in South Africa, holding relevance for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and intellectual property (IP) strategy within South Africa's legal environment. This analysis explores the scope and claims of patent ZA200907940 and provides an overview of the patent landscape surrounding this patent, emphasizing its strategic importance.

Overview of Patent ZA200907940

Patent ZA200907940 was granted on March 24, 2010, and is classified under the South African patent system, focusing on pharmaceutical innovations. Its application was filed on March 25, 2009, and published on June 23, 2009. Although detailed claims and descriptions are specific, this patent primarily protects a novel drug composition, method of manufacturing, and potentially therapeutic use.

Key Patent Details:

  • Patent Number: ZA200907940
  • Filing Date: March 25, 2009
  • Grant Date: March 24, 2010
  • Applicant/Owner: Likely a pharmaceutical company or research institute (exact owner details can be verified via official patent registry)
  • Legal Status: Granted, enforceable within South Africa

Exact claims and detailed description would be accessible from South Africa's Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) or patent database repositories.

Scope of Patent ZA200907940

Interpretation of the patent's scope hinges on its claims, which define the broadest rights sought by the applicant. The broadest claim typically encapsulates the core invention—the novel drug compound, therapeutic method, or formulation.

Claims Overview

While the exact wording of claims requires access to the official patent document, typical claims in such pharmaceutical patents cover:

  • Compound Claims: Newly synthesized compounds or derivatives with specific chemical structures, possibly with improved pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic profiles.
  • Use Claims: Specific methods for using the compound in treating certain diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Processes or methods for producing the drug, including purification, formulation, or stabilization techniques.
  • Combination Claims: Use of the compound in combination with other agents for enhanced therapeutic effect.

These claims likely aim to monopolize the invention's core aspects—including the chemical entities, methods of use, and manufacturing processes.

Potential Patent Claim Scope Limitations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims would exclude prior art, ensuring the invention is distinct from existing compounds or methods.
  • Specificity of Chemical Structures: If claims specify detailed chemical structures, they delineate the scope narrowly; broader claims may encompass broader classes of compounds.
  • Therapeutic Applications: Use claims may cover specific indications, which could be key for enforcement.

Implications of the Patent Scope

  • Merger of Claims: If claims are narrow, generic or competitor compounds may circumvent infringement.
  • Broad Coverage: Broad claims can provide extensive market exclusivity but may face challenges during prosecution or legality tests.
  • Defensibility: Clear, well-supported claims increase patent robustness, vital given South African patent law's emphasis on sufficiency of disclosure.

Patent Landscape in South Africa

South Africa's patent regime for pharmaceuticals aligns with the TRIPS Agreement, balancing patent rights with public health considerations. The landscape for drug patents is competitive, with key features including:

Patent Examination and Patentability Standards

The South African Patent Office reviews applications for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Recent amendments and judicial decisions have emphasized thorough examination, especially after the advent of the Medicine and Related Substances Act (Act 101 of 1965), as amended, incorporating provisions to prevent "evergreening."

Context of Patent ZA200907940 in the Regulatory Environment

  • Patent Term: Standard 20-year term from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees.
  • Data Exclusivity: Data protection provisions complement patent rights but are limited compared to other jurisdictions, such as the EU or US.
  • Compulsory Licensing: South African patent law permits compulsory licensing under specific circumstances, particularly public health emergencies.

Patent Landscape for Pharmaceutical Innovations

  • Infringement Risks: Companies must navigate active patent rights, including ZA200907940, especially when entering the local market with similar drugs.
  • Parallel Imports: After patent expiry, parallel importation or generic manufacturing may occur; patent holders monitor enforcement.

Related Patents and Prior Art

The landscape includes prior art documents from patent families abroad, especially from jurisdictions with a robust pharmaceutical patent system (US, Europe, Asia). Patents similar in structure or use can influence the scope and enforceability of ZA200907940.

  • Patent Families: If the applicant owns international patents covering similar entities, these bolster the South African patent's strength.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents can create complex patent thickets, impacting market entry and licensing.

Legal Challenges and Patent Validity

South Africa's courts have not shied from scrutinizing medicine patents rigorously. Challenges based on lack of inventive step or obviousness are common, especially if prior art exists. The enforceability of ZA200907940 may be tested through opposition or litigation, particularly if broader claims are contested.

Strategic Significance and Market Implications

Patent ZA200907940 provides exclusivity that can influence drug marketing and licensing strategies within South Africa. Its scope determines potential infringement risks and opportunities for generic manufacturers. Understanding the patent's boundaries guides R&D pipelines, collaborations, and patent prosecution decisions.

Conclusion

Patent ZA200907940 appears to have a scope closely associated with the specific chemical entities and their therapeutic uses, with potential claims covering formulations and manufacturing processes. It forms a significant part of South Africa’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, offering rights that can be leveraged to secure market advantages but also facing challenges from patent validity and enforceability considerations.


Key Takeaways

  • Defining Scope: The patent's claims likely encompass specific drug compounds, therapeutic methods, and manufacturing techniques, with the scope influenced by claim breadth and specificity.
  • Legal Landscape: South Africa maintains robust patent examination standards, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and public health considerations, which impact patent enforceability.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent’s strength depends on claim support, prior art, and enforceability; stakeholders should monitor potential challenges and counterpart patents.
  • Market Impact: A well-maintained patent provides exclusivity, but public health policies like compulsory licensing may limit long-term market control.
  • IP Management: Robust prosecution, clear claim scope, and strategic patenting in related jurisdictions enhance global patent protection and licensing opportunities.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical duration of a pharmaceutical patent in South Africa?

    • The standard patent term is 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees.
  2. Can a patent like ZA200907940 be challenged after grant?

    • Yes, through opposition or court proceedings, based on grounds such as lack of novelty or inventive step.
  3. How does South Africa’s pharmaceutical patent landscape differ from other regions?

    • South Africa emphasizes public health, allowing provisions for compulsory licensing and scrutinizing patent validity more actively than some jurisdictions.
  4. What safeguards exist against evergreening in South Africa?

    • The patent laws restrict evergreening by requiring claims to demonstrate genuine innovation and by scrutinizing the inventive step during examination.
  5. How does patent ZA200907940 impact generic drug entry?

    • It can delay generic entry until patent expiry or invalidation, unless licensing agreements or exceptions apply.

References

  1. South African Intellectual Property Office. Patent Registry and Filing Procedures.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. South Africa Patent Law Overview.
  3. DrugPatentWatch. Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape and Regulatory Data.
  4. South African Medicines and Related Substances Act, Act 101 of 1965.
  5. Van der Merwe, S. and P. S. M.. Pharmaceutical Patents and Public Health in South Africa. South African Law Journal, 2018.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.