You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 18, 2026

Profile for South Africa Patent: 200402184


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 200402184

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
6,967,208 May 21, 2027 Bristol ELIQUIS SPRINKLE apixaban
6,967,208 May 21, 2027 Bristol Myers Squibb ELIQUIS apixaban
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Africa Patent ZA200402184

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

South African patent ZA200402184 pertains to a specific invention within the pharmaceutical domain. This patent's scope and claims define the breadth of proprietary rights conferred upon the applicant, while its position within the patent landscape reveals strategic insights into innovation trends, competitive positioning, and licensing opportunities. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, contextualizes its scope, and explores the surrounding patent environment influencing its enforceability and value.


Patent Overview

ZA200402184, filed in 2004, is categorized as a pharmaceutical patent under South Africa’s patent system, which is governed by the Patents Act 57 of 1978. The patent boasts a standard term of 20 years from the filing date, offering exclusive rights to prevent unauthorized use of the claimed invention.

While detailed specifics of the patent device are not explicitly provided here, it can be inferred from typical patent practices that the patent likely encompasses novel compounds, formulations, or indications related to a therapeutic agent. Such patents usually include claims directed toward chemical entities, their uses, and methods of manufacturing, often supported by detailed description and exemplification.


Scope of the Claims

Claim Structure and Focus

The claims form the legal core of the patent, delineating what the patent holder exclusively owns. Patent ZA200402184 likely contains independent claims covering:

  • A chemical compound or class of compounds with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound(s), possibly with specified excipients or delivery mechanisms.
  • Therapeutic methods utilizing the claimed compound(s), targeting particular indications.

Dependent claims would specify variants, such as different stereoisomers, salts, esters, or dosage forms.

Scope Analysis

  • Broadness: If the claims are drafted broadly—covering entire classes of compounds or generic formulations—they can effectively deter competitors and provide wider protection.
  • Narrowness: Conversely, narrowly focused claims, emphasizing only specific compounds or methods, limit the scope and could be more vulnerable to design-around strategies.
  • Claim Language: Precise language using structural formulas, specific substituents, or functional descriptors enhances enforceability, but overly broad claims might face validity challenges during examination or litigation.

Potential Patent Chain

Given the patent's antecedent date (2004), it might be part of a layered patent portfolio, with earlier filings covering core compounds or foundational platforms. Later filings could involve improvements, formulations, or therapeutic methods, reinforcing patent strength.


Patent Landscape in South Africa and Related Jurisdictions

Regional Patent Environment

South Africa’s patent system aligns closely with international standards, being a member of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) since 1994, which facilitates the filing of applications across multiple jurisdictions. The country has a robust pharmaceutical patent landscape with notable filings by local and multinational companies.

Competitive Patents

The patent landscape for the invention likely features:

  • Prior Art: Several patents and patent applications focusing on similar chemical scaffolds, methods of synthesis, and indications.
  • Major Players: Multinational pharmaceutical companies and local innovators dominate the landscape, with filings often overlapping in therapeutic areas like oncology, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions.
  • Patent Families: The patent may belong to a broader patent family filed via PCT or European routes, offering cross-jurisdictional protection.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • Validity Challenges: Substantive examination in South Africa involves assessing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Potential challenges may arise if prior art surfaces that anticipate claims or render them obvious.
  • Oppositions: While oppositions are not a standard procedure in South Africa, third-party observations during application prosecution or post-grant challenges remain avenues for contesting patent validity.
  • Patent Term and Deadlines: The standard 20-year term is critical, emphasizing the importance of timely maintenance and renewal.

Innovation Trends and Strategic Implications

The patent landscape in South Africa reflects a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring generic access. For pharmaceutical patentees, securing broad claims early on, coupled with strategic patent family expansion, enhances market exclusivity.

Given the chronological context (a 2004 filing), stakeholders should consider:

  • The likelihood of patent expiry around 2024-2025, opening the market for generics.
  • Whether secondary patents covering formulations or methods have extended exclusivity.
  • The potential for patent challenges based on prior art, especially in light of emerging research.

Regulatory and Commercial Context

Patent-Linked Market Exclusivity

In South Africa, patent protection significantly influences market dynamics and drug pricing, impacting access and affordability. Drugs protected by strong patents often command higher prices but face scrutiny under public health considerations.

Parallel Filings and Patent Cooperation

If the patent is part of an international patent family, its protection in other markets (e.g., Europe, US, Africa) complements local rights, facilitating global commercialization and licensing strategies.


Conclusion

Patent ZA200402184 embodies a strategic stake in a pharmaceutical innovation within South Africa, with its scope predominantly defined by the breadth of its claims. Its position within the patent landscape reflects ongoing competition, with potential implications for market exclusivity, licensing, and generic entry. The strength and validity of the patent hinge on precise claim drafting, thorough novelty and inventive step assessments, and proactive portfolio management.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of ZA200402184 depends heavily on claim language—broad claims offer extensive protection but risk validity challenges, while narrow claims may limit enforceability.
  • A mature patent landscape in South Africa necessitates vigilance concerning prior art, patent challenges, and parallel filings in key jurisdictions.
  • The patent’s expiration timeline around 2024-2025 makes strategic planning critical for patent holders regarding lifecycle management and potential generic competition.
  • Strong patent protection in South Africa can elevate a drug’s market position but must be balanced with global regulatory and competitive considerations.
  • Stakeholders should evaluate secondary patent filings, formulations, and methods to extend exclusivity or defend against generic challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary focus of patent ZA200402184?
    The patent likely covers a specific chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or therapeutic use, aimed at protecting a novel drug entity or method.

  2. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
    The scope varies; broad claims cover extensive classes of compounds or uses, offering wider protection, whereas narrow claims focus on specific compounds or formulations, offering more targeted but limited rights.

  3. What strategies can patent holders employ to maximize protection in South Africa?
    They should expand their patent family internationally, file secondary patents for formulations or methods, and rigorously defend against prior art challenges.

  4. What are the risks associated with patent expiration in South Africa?
    Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can introduce equivalent products, reducing market exclusivity and affecting profits.

  5. How does South Africa's patent environment influence access to medicines?
    Patent protection can limit generic entry, raising prices, but is balanced by public health initiatives and flexibilities like compulsory licensing in certain circumstances.


References

  1. South African Patents Act 57 of 1978.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Landscapes in Africa.
  3. South African Patent Office. Patent Examination Guidelines.
  4. International Patent Law Overview.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in South Africa.

Note: Due to limited publicly available details on patent ZA200402184, some interpretations are based on typical patent practices within the pharmaceutical domain and general South African patent procedures. For comprehensive legal analysis or patent-specific strategies, consult the full patent documentation and legal counsel.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.