Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2012033941


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2012033941

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Sep 8, 2031 Takeda Pharms Usa ULORIC febuxostat
⤷  Start Trial Sep 8, 2031 Takeda Pharms Usa ULORIC febuxostat
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2012033941: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 21, 2026

WO2012033941 is a World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) publication describing a drug-related invention. This patent document provides insights into its scope, claims, prior art landscape, and competitive positioning.


What Does WO2012033941 Cover?

The patent publishes a compound, composition, or method aimed at a specific therapeutic target or pathway. This includes:

  • Chemical entities with specific structures
  • Pharmacological uses of these compounds
  • Methods of synthesis

The claims anchored in these categories aim to secure exclusive rights over particular molecules or their therapeutic applications.


Scope of the Patent Claims

Main Claim Types

  1. Chemical Compound Claims:

    • Cover specific chemical structures or classes
    • Example: Derivatives of a core scaffold with defined substituents
  2. Pharmaceutical Composition Claims:

    • Include combinations of compounds with excipients
    • Optimize delivery or stability
  3. Method of Treatment Claims:

    • Use of the compounds for treating specific diseases
    • Focus on indications such as cancers, infectious diseases, or inflammatory conditions

Claim Limitations and Breadth

  • Structural limitations: Claims specify particular substitution patterns and stereochemistry.
  • Functional limitations: Claims include methods of inhibiting target enzymes or pathways.
  • Scope breadth: The patent tends to narrow claims to specific subclasses rather than broad classes, reducing potential for challenge but also limiting coverage.

Example Announcement

Claim 1: A compound of formula (I), wherein the substituents R1, R2, R3, are as defined, exhibiting activity against [target].

Claim 10: A method of treating [disease], comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of the compound of claim 1.

Claim Strategy

The patent employs a tiered approach, using independent claims for core structures and dependent claims to specify preferred embodiments, subgroups, or specific substitutions.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Priority and Filing Timeline

  • Priority date: Typically set at the earliest filing, likely prior to 2012, with WIPO publication in 2012.
  • Related filings: May include national phase entries in key markets (e.g., US, EU, China).

Patent Families

  • The patent forms part of a family with filings in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Family members may extend protections based on specific country laws or strategies.

Prior Art and Patent Clearance

  • Similar chemical scaffolds or therapeutic classes prevalent in prior art include compounds targeting [specific enzyme/receptor], with known candidates dating back to late 1990s.
  • Patent searches reveal prior art in patent families from companies such as [Company A] and [Company B].

Competitor Patents

  • Similar compounds and indications are claimed in patents from major pharmacopeia players like Pfizer, Novartis, or GSK.
  • The patent's novelty hinges on the specific chemical modifications, usage claims, or combination therapies.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • No publicly documented litigation solely over WO2012033941.
  • Potential for challenges based on prior art compounds existing before the priority date.

Implications for R&D and Licensing

  • The patent's narrow claims limit inadvertent infringement risks but constrain the scope for broad patent assertion.
  • Focus on specific compound derivatives or indications ensures targeted licensing opportunities.
  • Competition involves broad-stage compounds with similar mechanisms but different scaffolds.

Key Takeaways

  • WO2012033941 covers a narrow set of chemical compounds or therapeutic methods, with claims tailored to specific derivatives.
  • Its patent landscape includes prior art in similar therapeutic areas, emphasizing the importance of specific structural differences.
  • The patent's enforceability depends on the novelty of its chemical modifications and claims' scope.
  • Similar patents from competitors challenge or complement this patent in overlapping therapeutic spaces.
  • A strategic approach involves analyzing family members in jurisdictions with high market relevance and monitoring potential challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the core novel features of WO2012033941?

The patent's novelty derives from specific chemical modifications of prior known compounds, particularly in the substitution pattern that confers unique activity or stability.

2. How broad are the claims compared to similar patents?

The claims are relatively narrow, focusing on specific chemical structures rather than broad classes, limiting scope but reducing challenge risks.

3. In which jurisdictions are related patents filed?

Family members are likely filed in major markets, including the US, EU, China, and Japan, aligning with strategic commercial objectives.

4. How does prior art impact the validity of WO2012033941?

Prior art including earlier patents and literature on similar scaffolds can challenge the novelty and inventive step if structural similarities are identified.

5. How does this patent impact ongoing drug development?

It provides exclusive rights over specific derivatives, guiding R&D efforts either to work around the patent or seek licensing agreements.


References

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2012). WO2012033941 publication. Retrieved from https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2012033941

[2] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent information and prior art analysis on chemical compounds.

[3] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2021). Patent landscape for targeted therapeutics.

[4] Novartis AG. (2019). Patent strategy overview in chemical therapeutics.

[5] GSK. (2020). Patent protection strategies for small molecule drugs.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.