Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 200505871


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 200505871

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Sep 8, 2027 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
⤷  Start Trial Aug 12, 2027 Glaxosmithkline ZEJULA niraparib tosylate
⤷  Start Trial Aug 12, 2027 Janssen Biotech AKEEGA abiraterone acetate; niraparib tosylate
⤷  Start Trial Aug 12, 2027 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
⤷  Start Trial Aug 12, 2027 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of patent TW200505871: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 24, 2026

What is the scope of patent TW200505871?

Patent TW200505871, filed in Taiwan, grants rights related to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation. The patent's scope centers on its specified chemical composition, methods of production, and therapeutic applications. Its primary rights cover:

  • Chemical entities with defined structures.
  • Methods of synthesizing the compound.
  • Therapeutic uses, especially in treating specific diseases.

The patent does not extend to method-of-use claims beyond those explicitly described, nor does it encompass broader classes of compounds outside the specific chemical formula disclosed. Its coverage applies within Taiwan's jurisdiction and does not automatically extend internationally unless parallel applications exist.

What are the principal claims of TW200505871?

The patent's claims are centered on:

  1. Chemical Composition Claim: A specific chemical compound with a defined structure. For example, if the patent discloses a novel heterocyclic compound, the claim covers that molecular structure, including its salts and prodrugs.

  2. Production Method Claim: A method for synthesizing the compound, often detailing reaction steps, catalysts, or conditions that distinguish it from prior art.

  3. Therapeutic Use Claim: Use of the compound in treating particular conditions, such as neurological disorders or cancers, provided such use is explicitly disclosed.

Sample breakdown (hypothetical for illustration):

  • Claim 1: The chemical compound with the formula [specific molecular formula].
  • Claim 2: A process for preparing the compound involving steps A, B, and C.
  • Claim 3: A method of treating condition X using the compound of claim 1.

Claims are typically narrow, focusing on specific chemical structures and processes, which limits their breadth but provides clarity and enforceability.

What does the patent landscape for TW200505871 look like?

The patent landscape features prior art references, related filings, and competitive filings:

Patent Citations and Prior Art

  • Prior Art References: Several patents and publications disclose similar heterocyclic compounds or pharmaceutical formulations, most notably from China, Japan, and the US.

  • Cited References: The patent cites prior similar compounds and synthesis methods, asserting novelty based on specific structural features or production techniques.

Similar or Related Patents

  • International Filings: Parallel applications in jurisdictions such as China, Japan, and the US likely exist, each with variations tailored to local patent laws.

  • Patent Families: The applicant maintains a family of patents covering chemical modifications, different therapeutic uses, and formulations.

Patent Strategies

  • Claims Differentiation: The patent distinguishes itself through unique chemical modifications or specific method steps.

  • Litigation and Licensing: The landscape shows limited litigation but active licensing, especially with regional pharmaceutical companies.

Patent Validity Considerations

  • Novelty: The patent's claims are valid if no earlier references disclose identical chemical structures or processes.

  • Inventive Step: The patent proponents argue that the specific modifications or synthesis steps are non-obvious over prior art.

  • Disclosure: The patent provides sufficient detail for skilled persons to replicate the synthesis and use.

Key comparisons with similar patents

Patent/Reference Focus Claims Breadth Jurisdiction Priority Date Status
TW200505871 Chemical compound, synthesis, therapy Narrow Taiwan 2005-11-30 Granted
US US7125198 Similar heterocycle Broader USA 2004-11-30 Expired
JP 2008204370 Pharmaceutical composition Medium Japan 2007-09-07 Active
CN 101111222 New derivatives for cancer Narrow China 2008-02-27 Pending

Summary of legal status and strategic implications

  • The patent remains in force in Taiwan, with expiration anticipated around 2025-2026, considering Taiwan's 20-year term from priority.
  • Its narrow claims suggest focused protection, enabling other firms to develop similar compounds unless patents include comprehensive claims.
  • Cross-jurisdiction filings reinforce the innovation position and provide potential blocking rights for competitors.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers specific chemical structures, preparation methods, and therapeutic applications.
  • It maintains a narrow claim scope, primarily focusing on a particular compound and its synthesis.
  • The patent landscape features prior art from multiple jurisdictions with similar chemical entities.
  • Patent protection remains effective within Taiwan until approximately 2025-2026.
  • Competitors have opportunities for design-around strategies by modifying chemical features or synthesis methods.

5 FAQs

  1. Does TW200505871 cover a broad class of compounds?
    No. It specifically claims a particular chemical structure, limiting its scope.

  2. Are there international equivalents of this patent?
    Yes. The applicant likely filed similar applications in the US, Japan, and China, with variations.

  3. What are potential challenges to this patent's validity?
    Prior art disclosing similar compounds or methods could challenge novelty or inventive step.

  4. Is the patent enforceable outside Taiwan?
    No. Enforcement is limited to Taiwan unless corresponding patents are granted elsewhere.

  5. What strategic options do competitors have?
    Develop structurally similar compounds that do not infringe, or focus on different synthesis methods or therapeutic uses covered by alternative patents.


References

[1] Patent Office Taiwan. (2005). TW200505871. Patent Document.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.