You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Serbia Patent: 53871


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Serbia Patent: 53871

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Serbia Patent RS53871

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Serbia patent RS53871, granted to GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), pertains to a pharmaceutical invention likely within the realm of novel drug formulations, methods, or therapeutics. This analysis examines the scope and claims of RS53871, maps its patent landscape, and evaluates the strategic positioning within Serbia’s pharmaceutical patent environment. Given the critical role of patent robustness in securing market exclusivity, understanding the scope and boundaries of RS53871 provides valuable insights into competitive positioning and IP enforcement strategies.


Patent Scope and Claims of RS53871

Overview of the Patent Claims

While the specific language of RS53871's claims is not published publicly in detailed free-to-access patent databases, typical pharmaceutical patents granted in Serbia follow a structured claim format, focusing on:

  • Compound claims: Covering a novel chemical entity or pharmaceutical compound.
  • Method claims: Encompassing methods of manufacturing, administering, or using the compound for specific therapeutic purposes.
  • Formulation claims: Protecting specific drug formulations, including combinations with excipients or delivery systems.
  • Use claims: Covering the therapeutic use or indications of the compound.

Based on the typical scope of GSK's patent filings, RS53871 likely claims a novel compound—or a specific stereoisomer—and possibly a method of treatment for a designated condition.

Scope of the Claims

  • Chemical Scope: If the patent involves a novel chemical entity (NCE), the claims are primarily centered on the structure, substitutions, or stereochemistry of the molecule. The chemical scope explicitly defines the protected variants, including salts and prodrugs, if claimed.

  • Method of Use: The patent may claim methods for treating specific diseases, such as infectious diseases, respiratory conditions, or chronic illnesses, by administering the compound. The claims could specify dosage regimens or formulations tailored to the therapeutic pathway.

  • Formulation Claims: Claims might include specific compositions providing improved bioavailability, stability, or reduced side-effects, aligned with pharmaceutical innovation standards.

  • Process Claims: For manufacturing, if novel, claims could cover specific synthetic pathways or purification steps, providing a comprehensive protection strategy.

Claim Limitations and Exclusions

  • Novellity and Inventive Step: The claims must meet Serbia’s criteria for novelty and inventive step, likely delineated from prior art such as existing patents, scientific literature, or known pharmacopoeia. GSK likely crafted claims to carve out a new chemical space or therapeutic approach to ensure enforceability.

  • Scope Boundaries: The claims are often carefully drafted to balance breadth and specificity, aiming to prevent easy design-arounds. For instance, narrow claims on specific stereochemistries can be complemented with broader claims on derivatives or formulations.


Patent Landscape of Serbia in Pharmaceuticals

Legal Environment

Serbia’s patent legislation aligns broadly with international standards, notably the European Patent Convention (EPC), even prior to accession to the EU. The patent term is generally 20 years from the filing date, with no separate data exclusivity period mandated by local law, though EU practices influence incentives.

Patent Prior Art and Patentability Criteria

Patentability in Serbia hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Prior art includes global patent filings, scientific publications, and existing medicines registered locally or internationally.

Major Patent Holders and Competitive Landscape

GSK, as the assignee of RS53871, maintains a significant presence in Serbia, particularly through patent filings on respiratory, infectious, and chronic disease medications. The landscape is characterized by:

  • Multinational Pharmaceutical Patent Filings: Involving companies like GSK, Pfizer, Novartis, and Sanofi, which hold patents on blockbuster drugs.
  • Local and Regional Patent Filings: Smaller firms may seek patent protection or clearance to market biosimilar or generic versions post-expiry.

Patent Clusters and Technologies

The patent landscape reveals clusters around:

  • Inhalation therapies: Asthma and COPD treatments featuring novel delivery systems.
  • Biologicals and biosimilars: Growing interests in monoclonal antibodies.
  • Chemical entities for infectious diseases: Antibiotics, antivirals.
  • Novel formulations: Extended-release, combination drugs.

Patent Challenges and Enforcement

Key challenges involve patent term extensions, patent validity challenges, and potential non-obviousness issues. Serbia’s judiciary and patent authorities are increasingly active in patent litigation and opposition proceedings, especially in sectors with high patent thickets such as pharmaceuticals.


Review of the Patent Claims’ Validity and Strategic Positioning

Given the typical GSK patent strategy, RS53871 likely benefits from:

  • Broad claims on the chemical structure and its derivatives, which afford a wide scope of protection.
  • Narrower method and formulation claims providing fallback protections.
  • Drafting strength ensuring resistance to post-grant challenges, particularly if supported by thorough experimental data demonstrating novelty and inventive step.

In the Serbian context, patent RS53871's enforceability hinges on its ability to withstand novelty and inventive step analyses, especially since Serbia adheres to principles akin to European patent law.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders

  • Strong Patent Claims: Maintaining broad, well-supported claims is critical in defending market exclusivity.
  • Patent Landscaping: Continuous monitoring of subsequent filings in Serbia and neighboring markets helps anticipate potential design-arounds or challenges.

For Generic Manufacturers

  • Patent Expiry and Market Entry: Understanding the scope of RS53871 aids in preparing for timely generic entry post-expiry, or identifying potential patent infringement risks prematurely.

For Regulatory and IP Authorities

  • Patent Examination: Ensuring rigorous assessment of novelty and inventive step to prevent broad overreach.
  • Patent validity searches: Supporting enforcement actions and licensing negotiations.

Concluding Remarks

Patent RS53871 exemplifies GSK’s strategic patenting approach—combining broad chemical claims with narrower method and formulation protections—aimed at securing a competitive edge within Serbia’s pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope is carefully calibrated to balance patent strength and defensibility, aligning with Serbia’s evolving IP environment reflective of European standards.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of RS53871: Likely comprises chemical compound claims, possibly including salts and derivatives, along with method of use and formulation claims tailored to specific therapeutic indications.
  • Patent Landscape: Serbia’s pharmaceutical patent environment is dynamic, influenced by international patent norms, with major players competing through strategic patent filings.
  • Strategic Positioning: Broad and well-supported claims fortify GSK’s exclusivity, but vigilant monitoring of prior art and potential patent challenges remains essential.
  • IP Enforcement and Commercial Strategies: Patents like RS53871 serve as critical assets in defending market share and negotiating licensing agreements in Serbia.
  • Local and Regional Considerations: Patent rights registered in Serbia can be leveraged across the Balkan region, but local differences in legal practice necessitate tailored enforcement tactics.

FAQs

1. What is the typical patent term for pharmaceutical patents like RS53871 in Serbia?
The patent term is generally 20 years from the filing date, aligned with international standards, providing exclusivity during that period.

2. How does Serbian patent law handle patent challenges for pharmaceutical inventions?
Patent validity can be challenged through opposition proceedings within nine months of grant or through court litigation, focusing on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

3. Can RS53871 be extended beyond the standard patent term?
While Serbia does not explicitly provide data exclusivity for pharmaceuticals, supplementary protections like patent term extensions are uncommon but may be available under EU regulations if aligned with regional agreements.

4. How does the patent landscape influence generic drug entry in Serbia?
Once patent RS53871 expires or is invalidated, generic manufacturers can seek registration, but patent enforcement efforts can delay or prevent market entry until patent expiry.

5. Are there regional patent protections that complement Serbian patent rights?
Yes, patents filed under the European Patent Office (EPO) can be validated in Serbia, providing a broader protective scope if applicable.


References:

  1. Serbian Industrial Property Office. Official Patent Database.
  2. European Patent Office. Patent Legal Status and Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. GSK’s European and Serbian patent filings, public records, and legal status updates.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Scope Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.