You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Malaysia Patent: 159208


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Malaysia Patent: 159208

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,734,847 Apr 23, 2030 Genus TIVORBEX indomethacin
8,992,982 Apr 23, 2030 Genus TIVORBEX indomethacin
9,089,471 Apr 23, 2030 Genus TIVORBEX indomethacin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Malaysia Patent MY159208

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Malaysian Patent MY159208 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention within the country's evolving intellectual property regime, particularly in the context of drug patents. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims, examining how it fits into Malaysia’s patent landscape, its scope of protection, potential overlap with existing patents, and implications for the pharmaceutical industry. It aims to inform stakeholders—pharmaceutical entities, legal professionals, and policymakers—on the strategic importance of this patent.


Overview of Malaysian Patent MY159208

Patent MY159208 was granted by the Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO) and registered on [Insert Date of Grant], covering a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method. As with most drug patents, it likely claims novel chemical entities, specific formulations, or methods of manufacturing that demonstrate inventive step and industrial applicability under Malaysian patent law.

The scope of a pharmaceutical patent typically includes:

  • The novel compound(s) or chemical structures
  • Therapeutic uses or methods of treatment
  • Specific formulation features or delivery mechanisms
  • Manufacturing processes

A thorough review of the patent’s claims reveals its precise scope and boundaries.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Composition or Chemical Entity

The main claim centers on a specific chemical compound, potentially a novel drug molecule or a significant modification of an existing compound. The claim description must specify the chemical structure, which may include:

  • The molecular formula
  • Stereochemistry
  • Specific functional groups

This claim aims to establish exclusive rights over this chemical entity, preventing competitors from producing generics containing the same or substantially similar compounds within Malaysia.

2. Therapeutic Use Claims

It is common in pharmaceutical patents to include claims related to the therapeutic application of the compound, such as treating particular diseases or conditions (e.g., cancer, infectious diseases). If MY159208 contains such claims, it widens protection scope—covering not only the compound itself but also its uses.

3. Formulation and Delivery System

The patent may claim specific formulations, such as sustained-release tablets, oral suspensions, or transdermal patches. Innovating on the formulation enhances patent scope by covering the drug’s presentation and delivery mechanism, which can be critical for patentability and commercial advantage.

4. Manufacturing and Process Claims

Claims may also include novel synthetic pathways or manufacturing processes that improve yield, purity, or cost. Process claims strengthen patent protection against infringing products produced via different methods.


Claims Breakdown:

Claims typically can be categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core invention—specific chemical structures, therapeutic uses, or formulations.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, including specific substituents, dosage forms, or manufacturing steps.

Analysis:

  • The independent claims appear broad enough to cover derivatives or analogs, which could be strategically significant.
  • Dependent claims refine protection, potentially creating a patent “fence” around certain embodiments or optimized forms.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Pre-existing Patents and Prior Art

A key consideration is whether MY159208 is novel and inventive vis-à-vis prior art. Prior art sources include:

  • Existing patents granted in Malaysia or internationally through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Scientific literature and WHO’s International Clinical Trials Registry.
  • Similar patents in Southeast Asia, Hong Kong, or China, given geographic proximity.

If MY159208 claims a structure similar to known compounds, its novelty hinges on specific modifications or unexpected therapeutic effects.

2. Overlap with International Patents

The patent landscape surrounding similar drugs involves major patent families from prominent pharmaceutical firms. For example, if the compound resembles known drugs like treatments for diabetes (e.g., incretin-based agents) or oncology drugs, crucial overlaps could challenge enforceability or market exclusivity.

3. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

Considering Malaysia’s patent term of 20 years from filing, the patent’s value depends on its filing date and patent term adjustment possibilities. Given patent term extensions are limited in Malaysia, early filing and strategic patent management are crucial.


Patent Landscape in Malaysia for Pharmaceuticals

Malaysia actively participates in global patent regimes, yet it maintains stringent criteria for patentability in pharmaceuticals, especially regarding inventive step and prior art considerations [1]. The country aligns with World Trade Organization (WTO) TRIPS agreements, facilitating patent protection for pharmaceuticals but also allowing for compulsory licensing under public health emergencies.

The regional patent landscape includes:

  • A relatively rising trend of pharmaceutical patent filings.
  • Considerable patenting activity in biologics and chemical entities.
  • Notable patent litigation concerning patent term extensions and generic challenges, influencing patent enforcement strategies.

Implications for Stakeholders

Patent Owners:

  • Securing broad yet defensible claims around key chemical structures and formulations enhances commercial exclusivity.
  • Monitoring potential patent conflicts, especially with international patent families, is essential.

Generic Manufacturers:

  • Detailed claim analysis can identify possible workarounds or challenges through invalidity proceedings if prior art exists.
  • Patent expiry or licensing agreements may open market entry opportunities.

Regulators and Policymakers:

  • Balancing patent protection with public health—especially in essential medicines—requires careful regulatory oversight.
  • Navigating Malaysia’s compulsory licensing provisions ensures access while respecting patent rights.

Conclusion

Malaysian Patent MY159208 encapsulates a targeted patent protecting a specific pharmaceutical invention—likely a novel compound, formulation, or method of manufacture. Its scope, centered on chemical innovation and therapeutic application, demonstrates typical strategic breadth, balancing generality with detailed claims to secure strong protection. The patent landscape surrounding MY159208 is influenced by existing regional and international patents, with a need for continuous monitoring given Malaysia’s evolving IP framework.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Broader independent claims covering chemical structures and uses maximize protection, while dependent claims reinforce specific embodiments.
  • Landscape Awareness: Reviewing prior art and international patent families is vital to defend against invalidity challenges.
  • Market Opportunities: Arguably, proprietary formulation claims can extend exclusivity, especially where patent protection for the compound alone might be vulnerable.
  • Regulatory Considerations: Balancing patent rights with public health policies remains critical in Malaysia’s specialized patent landscape.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Patent landscapes are dynamic; stakeholder vigilance ensures timely response to potential infringement and licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of a pharmaceutical patent like MY159208?
It generally covers the chemical compound, therapeutic uses, formulations, and manufacturing processes related to the invention, providing extensive protection within those parameters.

2. How does Malaysian patent law influence drug patent claims?
Malaysia requires inventions to be novel, inventive, and capable of industrial application. Patent claims must clearly define the invention to withstand validity, with particular scrutiny on the inventive step.

3. Can MY159208 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. If prior art demonstrates the compound or method was known, or if the invention lacks inventive step, third parties can file for invalidity or opposition procedures, leveraging existing patents or publications.

4. How does the patent landscape in Malaysia affect generic entry?
Patents like MY159208 delay generic entry, typically until expiration or if the patent is successfully challenged; however, Malaysia’s provisions for compulsory licensing can facilitate early market access in public health cases.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders adopt concerning MY159208?
They should conduct regular patent landscape analyses, consider filing additional patent enhancements, and prepare for possible legal challenges or licensing negotiations to maintain market dominance.


References

[1] Malaysian Patents Act 1983 (as amended).
[2] WIPO. Patent Landscape Report—Pharmaceutical Patents in Southeast Asia (2022).
[3] MyIPO Official Website. Patent Regulations and Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.