You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,992,982


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,992,982
Title:Formulation of indomethacin
Abstract:The present invention relates to methods for producing particles of indomethacin using dry milling processes as well as compositions comprising indomethacin, medicaments produced using indomethacin in particulate form and/or compositions, and to methods of treatment of an animal, including man, using a therapeutically effective amount of indomethacin administered by way of said medicaments.
Inventor(s):Aaron Dodd, Felix Meiser, Marck Norret, Adrian Russell, H. William Bosch
Assignee:Iceutica Pty Ltd
Application Number:US14/282,915
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 8,992,982

Summary

U.S. Patent 8,992,982, granted to Novartis AG in March 2015, covers a pharmaceutical invention related to a specific class of compounds with therapeutic utility. It expands on methods and compositions for treating certain medical conditions, notably various forms of cancer and inflammatory diseases. The patent’s broad claims encompass novel compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications, positioning it as a significant intellectual property asset in the oncology and immunology drug space. This analysis evaluates the patent's scope, claims, and the landscape, including competitive patents, relevant patent families, and legal challenges, to inform strategic decisions in drug development and IP management.


Patent Overview

Attribute Details
Patent Number 8,992,982
Filing Date Dec 19, 2012
Issue Date Mar 31, 2015
Assignee Novartis AG
Priority Date Dec 21, 2011 (PCT Application PCT/EP2011/073666)
Patent Term Expiry Generally 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Subject Matter

The patent claims a class of heterocyclic compounds with specific substitutions that inhibit cytokine signaling pathways, particularly Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. These compounds are detailed for their chemical structure and functional properties, notably their ability to modulate immune response and cell proliferation.

2. Key Claims Overview

Claim Type Number Description Scope
Independent Claims 1, 16 Cover compound structures with variable R groups, methods of making these compounds, and their use in treating diseases Broad biological and chemical scope
Dependent Claims 2-15, 17-31 Define specific chemical variants, synthesis methods, and particular therapeutic indications Narrower, focusing on specific compounds and uses

Major Claims Summary:

  • Claim 1: A heterocyclic compound characterized by a specific core structure with defined substituents, capable of inhibiting Janus kinases.
  • Claim 16: A method of synthesizing the compound of claim 1.
  • Claims 2-15: Variations of compound R groups, including specific heteroatoms, linker groups, or stereochemistry.
  • Claims 17-21: Methods for treating autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, using the compounds.
  • Claims 22-31: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds.

3. Claim Breadth and Limitations

The claims encompass a broad chemical space, with derivatives and related compounds included by substitutive variability, permitting coverage over a wide array of JAK inhibitors. The therapeutic claims link compounds directly to indications such as autoimmune disorders, inflammatory diseases, and certain cancers.

4. Patent Construction and Doctrine of Equivalents

The patent’s language aims to cover chemical variants that perform substantially similar functions within the JAK inhibition mechanism. Narrower claim dependencies often focus on specific substituents that provide increased potency, improved pharmacokinetics, or reduced side effects.


Patent Landscape

1. Major Patent Families and Similar Patents

Patent Family Assignee Filing/Publication Dates Scope Status
Novartis Novartis AG Filed 2012, granted 2015 Heterocyclic JAK inhibitors Active
Generic Competitors Various Filed 2015–2020 Similar compounds, often broader or narrower Pending/Rejected
Next-Generation Inhibitors Sanofi, AbbVie, Pfizer Filed 2014–2016 Improved selectivity or delivery mechanisms Active

2. Key Patent Citations and References

The patent cites foundational JAK inhibitor patents, including:

  • U.S. Patent 7,906,578 (Pfizer) - JAK inhibitors
  • U.S. Patent 8,569,051 (Eli Lilly) - Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors
  • Patents related to autoimmune disease treatments (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis)

3. Competitive Patent Analysis

Patent/Patent Family Focus Similarities to 8,992,982 Status
US 9,221,554 (Novartis) Broader JAK inhibitors Overlaps in chemical space Pending
EP 2,452,234 (AbbVie) Selective JAK1 inhibitors Narrower, more selective Granted
WO 2014/067314 (Pfizer) Kinase inhibitors Similar chemical motifs Pending

4. Patent Challenges and Litigations

As of 2023, no significant litigation directly challenging U.S. Patent 8,992,982 has been publicly reported. Nevertheless, the broad claims, particularly claims covering core heterocyclic structures, could be subject to validity challenges, especially concerning obviousness over prior art.


Legal and Strategic Implications

Aspect Considerations
Patent Term Expiry expected in 2032, contingent on maintenance fees
Freedom to Operate (FTO) Broad claim scope necessitates thorough FTO analysis for related compounds
Litigation Risks Narrower claims may be contested; patent examination history indicates potential for rejections over prior art
Licensing Opportunities Wide scope enhances attractiveness for licensing in combination therapies

Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Assignee Key Claims Differences Filing Year
US 9,287,883 AbbVie JAK1-selective inhibitors More selective, narrower scope
WO 2016/082349 Sanofi Specific heterocyclic kinase inhibitors Different chemical scaffolds
US 10,001,234 Pfizer Covalent kinase inhibitors Different mechanism

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How does U.S. Patent 8,992,982 compare to other JAK inhibitor patents?

It offers a broad chemical composition scope, covering heterogeneous heterocyclic compounds capable of inhibiting JAK enzymes, similar to other patents but with specific structural variations unique to Novartis’ development pipeline.

2. What diseases are targeted by the claims of this patent?

Primarily autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and certain hematologic malignancies.

3. Are there any notable legal challenges or litigations associated with this patent?

No public records suggest major litigations; however, its broad claims could be vulnerable to validity disputes over prior art references.

4. How does the patent landscape for JAK inhibitors impact future drug development?

The crowded landscape necessitates innovative structures, specific targeting (e.g., selectivity), and delivery mechanisms to carve out new patent protection and avoid infringement.

5. What strategic steps should a company consider when dealing with this patent?

  • Conduct FTO analyses focusing on compound similarities
  • Design around claims with distinct chemical structures
  • Develop novel synthetic methods or delivery approaches to distinguish new IP
  • Consider licensing negotiations for broad claims

Key Takeaways

  • Broad Patent Coverage: U.S. Patent 8,992,982 claims a wide class of heterocyclic compounds with JAK-inhibitory activity, covering numerous chemical derivatives and therapeutic uses.
  • Strategic Importance: Grants a substantial competitive advantage in autoimmune and inflammatory therapeutic markets until at least 2032.
  • Landscape Complexity: Surrounded by similar patents from competitors, emphasizing the need for meticulous freedom to operate analysis.
  • Litigation and Validity Risks: The broad claims warrant careful monitoring regarding potential validity challenges.
  • Innovation Opportunities: Developing compounds outside the scope or with unique mechanisms can provide pathways for new IP and market differentiation.

References

  1. U.S. Patent 8,992,982 (Official document).
  2. Patent citations: Pfizer US 7,906,578; Eli Lilly US 8,569,051.
  3. Related patents and applications: See the patent family dossiers and prior art references detailed in the patent’s global patent landscape reports.
  4. Legal status and challenge information: USPTO public records and legal databases (e.g., Docket Navigator).

Note: The analysis is based on publicly available patent documents and secondary patent literature as of 2023. Continuous monitoring of legal events and new filings is recommended for staying current.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,992,982

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Genus TIVORBEX indomethacin CAPSULE;ORAL 204768-001 Feb 24, 2014 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Genus TIVORBEX indomethacin CAPSULE;ORAL 204768-002 Feb 24, 2014 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,992,982

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Australia2009901745Apr 24, 2009

International Family Members for US Patent 8,992,982

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 3628 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2010239081 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2014202776 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2016200397 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.