You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Malaysia Patent: 137830


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Malaysia Patent: 137830

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
6,967,208 May 21, 2027 Bristol ELIQUIS SPRINKLE apixaban
6,967,208 May 21, 2027 Bristol Myers Squibb ELIQUIS apixaban
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Malaysia Patent MY137830

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Malaysia Patent MY137830 pertains to a pharmacological invention in the realm of medicinal drugs. The scope and claims of this patent dictate its strength, breadth, and potential influence within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. Analyzing the patent’s scope and claims enables stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and researchers—to understand its territorial significance, enforceability, and competitive positioning. This detailed review assesses the patent’s claims, their scope, and the broader patent landscape in Malaysia concerning this patent.

Patent Overview and Context

Patent MY137830 was filed to protect an innovative drug or formulation, potentially linked to a novel composition, method of manufacturing, or therapeutic use. While specific patent documentation details are necessary for a comprehensive review, general industry practices suggest this patent might address a specific chemical entity, its derivatives, or a unique formulation providing a therapeutic advantage.

In Malaysia, patent law is governed by the Patents Act 1983 and its subsequent amendments, aligning closely with the Patents Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and regional standards. Patent protection in Malaysia extends up to 20 years from the filing date, provided maintenance fees are paid.

The patent landscape in Malaysian pharmaceuticals typically includes filings related to:

  • Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs)
  • Novel formulations or drug delivery systems
  • Method of use or treatment methods
  • Manufacturing processes for medicinal compounds

Understanding where MY137830 fits within these categories necessitates an analysis of its claims and scope.


Scope and Claims of Patent MY137830

1. General Nature of Claims

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent’s protection. They can be broadly categorized as:

  • Product claims: Covering a specific chemical entity or composition.
  • Method claims: Covering processes for manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Use claims: Covering specific therapeutic applications or indications.
  • Formulation claims: Covering specific formulations or delivery mechanisms.

Without the exact claim language, the analysis assumes MY137830 contains a combination of these types, with a core focus likely on a novel chemical compound or its pharmaceutical use.

2. Claim Breadth and Specificity

  • Independent Claims: These typically define the core invention—such as a novel compound or formulation—with broad language designed to encompass variants.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, providing specific embodiments, such as particular substituents in a chemical structure or specific dosing regimens.

The strength of the patent depends on the breadth of the independent claims. Broad claims that cover a wide class of compounds or uses can provide extensive market exclusivity but are more vulnerable to invalidation for lack of novelty or inventive step.

3. Key Claim Features

  • Chemical Scope: If the patent claims a specific compound, the scope depends on the scope of the chemical structure claimed—whether it covers only a single molecule or a class of derivatives.
  • Pharmacological Use: Claims may specify a treatment of particular diseases—e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims might cover a novel method of synthesizing or formulating the drug, adding another layer of exclusivity.

In Malaysian patent law, claims must meet criteria of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The “real-world” scope hinges on how well the claims meet these standards and how they are drafted.


Patent Landscape in Malaysia for Drugs

1. Patent Filing Trends

Malaysia's pharmaceutical patent filings often mirror innovations in local drug manufacturing, import-dependent markets, and regional patent strategies. Over recent years, there has been increased activity around:

  • Biologics and biosimilars
  • Nanoparticle-based formulations
  • Chemical entity modifications

While Malaysia does not host large-scale biopharmaceutical manufacturing, the patent landscape reflects regional innovation, with many applications citing foreign patents or encompassing local startups.

2. Key Patent Players

Major global pharmaceutical firms and regional biotech entities actively file patents in Malaysia. Patent MY137830 exists within this competitive landscape, where local generics manufacturers might seek entry or work around patents to develop cost-effective alternatives.

3. Patent Landscape for Similar Drugs

In Malaysia, existing patents often focus on similar therapeutic classes, such as anticancer agents and antibiotics. Patent estates are typically fragmented, with overlapping claims covering compounds or methods, raising potential for litigation or patent challenges.


Potential Patent Conflicts and Freedom-to-Operate

Given the high likelihood of overlapping claims across similar chemical classes, conducting freedom-to-operate analyses is vital before commercializing a drug related to MY137830. Patent infringement risks are significant if competitors hold earlier or broader patents covering similar active ingredients or therapeutic methods.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: The strength of patent MY137830 depends on claim clarity and compliance with Malaysian patent laws.
  • Patentability challenges: Prior art databases and regional patent filings could challenge novelty or inventive step, especially if similar compounds or uses exist.
  • Market exclusivity: Successful enforcement can secure high market share within Malaysia, but international protection requires additional filings.

Conclusion

Patent MY137830’s scope revolves around its core claims—most likely involving a novel drug compound, formulation, or method. Its strength depends on claim breadth, drafting quality, and compliance with Malaysian patent standards. The patent landscape suggests significant competition with existing patents covering similar pharmaceuticals, emphasizing the need for strategic patent drafting and clearance.

Stakeholders must regularly monitor patent filings and legal updates within Malaysia to safeguard their investments and optimize patent strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Determination: Precise claim drafting is critical—broad claims can deter competitors but risk invalidation; narrow claims may limit protection scope.
  • Strategic Positioning: Aligning patent claims with local and regional innovation is vital in Malaysia’s competitive drug market.
  • Landscape Awareness: Continuous monitoring of existing patents is essential to navigate infringement risks and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Legal Reliability: Ensuring patent compliance with Malaysian law enhances enforceability and market exclusivity.
  • Global Considerations: Expanding protection beyond Malaysia requires additional filings; local patents serve as a foundation for regional IP strategies.

FAQs

1. What constitutes the core inventive element in patent MY137830?
The core inventive element likely pertains to a specific chemical compound, its formulation, or therapeutic use, with exact details dependent on the drafted claim language.

2. How does Malaysian patent law influence drug patent claims?
Malaysian law requires claims to be novel, non-obvious, and industrially applicable. The scope is assessed against prior art to determine enforceability.

3. Can a competitor develop similar drugs if they avoid infringing on MY137830’s claims?
Yes. Competitors can design around claims by altering chemical structures or uses that are not covered, but careful analysis is required to avoid infringement.

4. How does patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical companies in Malaysia?
It highlights potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and areas where innovation is unprotected, guiding strategic patent filings.

5. What steps should be taken to strengthen patent protection in Malaysia?
Draft broad, clear claims within the bounds of patentability, conduct thorough prior art searches, and consider regional patent strategies for broader coverage.


References

  1. Malaysian Patents Act 1983. Government of Malaysia.
  2. Patent Guidelines of Malaysia. Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO).
  3. Recent Trends in Malaysian Pharmaceutical Patents. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2022.
  4. Regional Patent Landscape Reports for Southeast Asia. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
  5. Patent Search database. MyIPO Portal.

Note: The analysis above presumes typical patent claim structures and general patent landscape insights in Malaysia. For detailed claim language and legal status, review of official patent documents is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.