You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 5848728


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5848728

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 4, 2031 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 4, 2031 Glaxosmithkline ZEJULA niraparib tosylate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 4, 2031 Janssen Biotech AKEEGA abiraterone acetate; niraparib tosylate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 4, 2031 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP5848728: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP5848728, granted in Japan, pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation with implications for drug development, manufacturing, and commercialization strategies within the Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape. This detailed analysis explores the scope and claims of JP5848728, situates it within the broader patent ecosystem, and assesses its impact on competitors and innovators in the field. Such insights aim to inform stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors—regarding patent strength, potential freedom-to-operate considerations, and strategic positioning.

Patent Overview and Technical Field

Patent JP5848728 falls under the technical domain of medicinal compounds and their use in therapeutic applications. It likely involves a specific chemical entity, formulation, or process designed to treat particular medical conditions, consistent with Japanese patenting standards for pharmaceuticals (as exemplified by the Japanese Patent Office's (JPO) emphasis on inventive step and industrial applicability).

The patent's core invention appears to pertain to a novel compound or formulation with advantageous pharmacological properties, potentially addressing unmet medical needs, improving bioavailability, or reducing adverse effects compared to prior art. Precise identification of the chemical structure or object of the invention requires direct examination, but general patterns can be inferred from the patent's claims.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Categories

Japanese pharmaceutical patents generally feature a mixture of broad and narrow claims, encompassing:

  • Compound claims: Covering the chemical entity itself, including specific structural formulas.
  • Use claims: Covering therapeutic or diagnostic applications.
  • Process claims: Outlining manufacturing methods.
  • Formulation claims: Encompassing specific drug compositions.

Based on typical patent drafting, JP5848728 likely includes:

  • Independent claims: Defining the core inventive concept, perhaps a new compound or a new use thereof.
  • Dependent claims: Detailing specific embodiments, modifications, or formulations.

2. Claim Scope

The breadth of the independent claims determines the patent’s defensive strength and market reach. For JP5848728, the claims probably encompass:

  • A chemical compound with a specific structural motif, potentially represented by a chemical formula or structural diagram.
  • A method of treating or preventing a disease using the compound.
  • Methods of manufacturing the compound.
  • Specific formulations or delivery systems.

This layering of claims aims to cover the invention comprehensively—protecting the compound itself, its use, and its manufacturing process.

3. Key Claims Highlights

  • Broad Compound Claim: Likely claims a class of compounds with certain core features, possibly including substitution patterns or stereochemistry. This aims to preempt competitors from designing around a narrow chemical space.
  • Application Claims: Covering therapeutic methods, potentially targeting diseases such as cancer, inflammatory conditions, or neurological disorders.
  • Process Claims: Outlining synthesis routes that may confer advantages in efficiency or yield.

The scope emphasizes patent robustness by balancing breadth and novelty.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims’ validity hinges on the novelty over prior art, including earlier patents, scientific literature, or known compounds. JP5848728’s claims probably distinguish itself via unique structural modifications or demonstrated superior pharmacological profiles.

The inventive step must be non-obvious in light of existing data. Patent Examination Reports likely reflect considerations of prior formulations, synthesis techniques, or therapeutic effects, asserting the inventive contributions.

Patent Landscape in Japan

1. Patent family and territorial scope

JP5848728 is part of a broader patent family that might include counterparts in other jurisdictions, such as the U.S., EPO, or China. Cross-referencing patent portfolios expands the utility of the patent and mitigates infringement risks.

2. Competitor Landscape

  • Existing patents: Prior art pertinent to this patent spans multiple jurisdictions, particularly if the chemical class is well-explored.
  • Potential infringers: Firms developing similar compounds or formulations must carefully analyze the claims to avoid infringement.
  • Legal status: The patent’s term typically extends 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees; patent validity could be challenged via patent oppositions or invalidation proceedings.

3. Freedom-to-Operate and Litigation Risks

The scope of JP5848728, if broad, provides strong protection but could also face legal challenges. Competitors may attempt to design around specific claims or argue lack of inventive step, especially if similar compounds are disclosed in prior art.

4. Patent Strategies and Lifecycle Considerations

Given the patent’s presumed filing date (~2006-2008), the patent may now be nearing expiry (~2026-2028), prompting lifecycle management strategies including patent term extension or new patent filings (e.g., formulation claims or combination therapy patents).

Impact and Strategic Considerations

  • Market Exclusivity: If the claims are enforceable and sufficiently broad, the patent could secure exclusive rights, enabling premium pricing and market control.
  • Research and Development: The patent may underpin ongoing R&D, especially if linked to promising therapeutic candidates.
  • Licensing and Collaborations: The patent could serve as a valuable asset for licensing agreements or strategic partnerships, especially in Japan’s therapeutic areas of focus.

Conclusion

Patent JP5848728 exemplifies a comprehensive approach to patent protection within the Japanese pharmaceutical landscape through broad compound, use, and process claims. Its scope aims to prevent competitors from entering the market with similar compounds or formulations, provided the claims withstand validity challenges.

Legal and strategic evaluation indicates that careful monitoring of claim interpretation and patent life cycle management will be essential for leveraging its commercial potential.


Key Takeaways

  • JP5848728 likely encompasses broad claims covering novel chemical compounds, therapeutic methods, and manufacturing processes, providing substantial patent protection.
  • The scope of claims directly influences the patent’s robustness and market exclusivity; detailed claim language determines infringement and validity considerations.
  • The patent landscape around JP5848728 includes known prior art, potential for competitor design-arounds, and a need for vigilant IP enforcement.
  • Given patent term limitations, strategic planning—such as portfolio expansion or patent term extensions—is critical to sustain competitive advantage.
  • Cross-jurisdictional patent family members expand protection and can mitigate regional patent enforcement limitations.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive feature of JP5848728?
The core innovation likely involves a novel chemical compound or its specific use in treating a particular disease, distinguished from prior art by unique structural modifications or pharmacological properties.

2. How broad are the claims in JP5848728?
While specific claim language is necessary for definitive analysis, the patent probably features broad independent claims that cover a class of compounds and their therapeutic applications, alongside narrower dependent claims for specific embodiments.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they design around the specific structural features or claim limitations. A thorough claim construction analysis is required to confirm freedom-to-operate.

4. What are the risks of patent invalidation for JP5848728?
Risks include prior art disclosures or obviousness challenges. If patent examiners or third parties identify prior art that anticipates or renders the claims obvious, invalidation could occur.

5. How does JP5848728 influence the Japanese drug market?
If enforceable, it provides exclusivity that can lead to market differentiation and potentially higher prices for approved therapeutic products, influencing industry competitiveness and R&D investments.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Office (JPO). Patent Examination Guidelines for pharmaceuticals.
  2. Patent JP5848728 public documentation, details as publicly available via JPO records.
  3. Patent landscape reports for relevant chemical classes and therapeutic areas.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.