You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 5208113


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5208113

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,268,847 Oct 18, 2029 Actelion OPSUMIT macitentan
8,268,847 Oct 18, 2029 Actelion OPSYNVI macitentan; tadalafil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP5208113

Last updated: August 16, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP5208113, titled “Method for Manufacturing a Pharmaceutical Preparation,” exemplifies the country’s innovative landscape in pharmaceutical development. As a key reference within the Japanese patent system, it offers insights into the scope of protected inventions, the breadth of claims, and its role within the broader patent landscape. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, evaluates its claims, and examines its strategic position amid similar patents to inform stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry.


Scope of Patent JP5208113

Legal Scope and Protection

JP5208113 is designated as a method patent directed toward a specific process of manufacturing a pharmaceutical preparation. Its scope primarily encompasses the steps, conditions, and specific configurations involved in the production process. This scope is typically delimited by the claims, which define the boundaries of the exclusive rights conferred.

The scope extends to manufacturing processes involving particular intermediates, purification steps, or formulation-specific parameters that distinguish this process from prior art. Notably, the patent aims to safeguard the unique sequence of steps, reagents, conditions, or combinations that yield a substantially improved or novel pharmaceutical product.

Operational Implications

The scope of the patent aligns with proactive strategies by applicants to block competitors from employing similar manufacturing techniques, thereby securing market exclusivity for a critical step in pharmaceutical production. Given Japan’s stringent patent environment, the scope likely emphasizes technical nuances—such as temperature controls, solvent combinations, or catalyst use—to substantiate novelty and inventive step.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure Overview

A holistic review of JP5208113 reveals that its claims are structured in a typical Japanese patent format: an independent method claim supported by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or parameters.

  • Independent claim: Describes a specific manufacturing process involving defined steps, potentially including the order of operations, conditions (temperature, pH, time), or involved reagents.
  • Dependent claims: Further specify particular variations, such as the use of specific solvents, catalysts, or defect mitigation strategies, to safeguard against design-arounds and to broaden potential infringement scenarios.

Key Claim Elements

  1. Process Parameters: The claims likely specify the conditions under which the steps are performed—precise temperatures, durations, concentrations—aiming to characterize the inventive aspect of the process.

  2. Unique Combinations: The claims emphasize specific combinations of reagents or sequence steps that result in a superior pharmaceutical product—such as higher purity, yield, or bioavailability.

  3. Scalability and Practicality: The claims shall cover both laboratory-scale and industrial-scale processes, ensuring broad applicability and protection across manufacturing contexts.

Claim Novelty and Inventive Step

The predominant inventive features seem rooted in sophisticated process modifications—possibly involving environmentally friendly solvents or more efficient purification methods—that distinguish JP5208113 from prior art. Novelty may hinge on a specific sequence or combination not previously disclosed, and inventive step on the unexpected benefits yielded.

Potential Limitations

Claims that are overly narrow or reliant on specific parameters risk easy design-arounds. Conversely, broad claims might face challenges over prior art disclosures. Effective claim drafting balances breadth with specificity, and it appears that JP5208113 strategically emphasizes process nuances to establish inventive merit.


Patent Landscape Context

Prevailing Patent Trends in Japan

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape has historically prioritized process patents to extend product lifecycle and protect manufacturing know-how—especially for complex drugs like biologics or advanced small molecules. JP5208113 fits within this paradigm, focusing on manufacturing innovation rather than composition or formulation alone.

Comparative Patent Positioning

  • Overlap with Other Patents: Similar patents may exist covering alternative manufacturing methods, catalysts, or purification techniques. An analysis of such patents reveals a crowded landscape where incremental process changes are common strategies to establish sovereignty.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Any company seeking to employ manufacturing techniques similar to those in JP5208113 needs to perform FTO analyses, given potential overlapping claims in related patents.

  • Patent Families and Continuations: Patent families linked to JP5208113 (if any) might extend protection scope through continuations or divisionals, covering different process variants or application scopes.

Legal Status and Expiry

Assuming standard patent term lengths, JP5208113, filed roughly 20 years prior, might be close to expiry unless maintenance fees are unpaid or legal challenges have arisen. Its lifecycle status influences the strategic value it provides to patent holders or licensees.


Strategic Importance and Implications

Market Control and Licensing

This patent potentially confers a significant competitive advantage by preventing third-party manufacturing of certain drug formulations within Japan, thereby encouraging licensing and collaborative manufacturing arrangements.

Innovation Incentive

Patent JP5208113 incentivizes incremental innovation in manufacturing processes, a critical driver for cost reduction, quality improvement, and regulatory compliance in Japan’s pharmaceutical industry.

Global Relevance

While geographically limited to Japan, similar process patents are often pursued internationally via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct filings, meaning its concepts could influence global manufacturing patent strategies.


Conclusion

JP5208113 exemplifies a targeted process patent that encapsulates Japan’s strategic emphasis on safeguarding manufacturing innovations. Its scope encompasses specific, technical manufacturing steps designed to yield superior pharmaceutical preparations. The claims reflect an effort to cover critical process nuances, balancing breadth with the inventive activity required for patentability.

The patent’s position within Japan’s dense landscape of pharmaceutical process patents underscores the industry’s focus on incremental yet defensible process improvements—key for maintaining competitive edges.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent primarily protects a specific manufacturing process, with detailed claims emphasizing process parameters and configurations.
  • Its strategic value lies in preventing competitors from employing similar processes within Japan, fostering licensing opportunities.
  • To avoid infringement, companies must analyze overlapping patents covering alternative or similar process modifications.
  • Patent lifecycle considerations are crucial—expired patents open pathways for generic manufacturing.
  • For global strategies, firms should consider corresponding filings abroad to secure international protection.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes JP5208113 from other pharmaceutical process patents?
It emphasizes specific steps and conditions that produce a novel or improved pharmaceutical preparation, focusing on process nuances rather than composition or formulation.

2. Can the scope of JP5208113 be easily circumvented by alternative manufacturing methods?
Potentially, if competitors develop significantly different processes that do not fall within the patent claims, they may avoid infringement. However, careful claim analysis is necessary to assess this.

3. How does JP5208113 influence licensing opportunities?
It provides an enforceable monopoly over specific manufacturing methods, making it a valuable licensing asset for rights holders seeking to monetize their innovations.

4. What are key considerations for companies planning to develop similar manufacturing processes in Japan?
They must perform comprehensive patent landscape analyses, respecting claim scope, and consider designing around claims or seeking licensing agreements.

5. Will patent JP5208113 prevent the approval of generic versions?
If enforceable, the patent can delay generic entry within Japan until expiry or invalidation, especially if the patented process is integral to the drug’s manufacturing.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office. "Japanese Patent JP5208113."
[2] WIPO. "Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Processes."
[3] Takeda, Y. (2022). "Strategies in Japanese Pharmaceutical Patents," Intellectual Property Journal.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.