You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2017002082


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2017002082

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 4, 2028 Alnylam Pharms Inc AMVUTTRA vutrisiran sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 4, 2028 Novartis LEQVIO inclisiran sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 12, 2029 Alnylam Pharms Inc AMVUTTRA vutrisiran sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 12, 2029 Alnylam Pharms Inc GIVLAARI givosiran sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2017002082

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2017002082 (hereafter JP2082) relates to innovative pharmaceutical inventions aimed at addressing specific therapeutic needs. Patent landscapes and claim scopes in Japan are crucial for assessing patent strength, freedom to operate, and potential for exclusivity. This analysis dissects the scope of the claims, evaluates the patent landscape context, and provides insights for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry.


Patent Overview and Legal Status

JP2017002082 was published on January 26, 2017, under the Japan Patent Office (JPO). The application was filed on July 1, 2016, indicating a typical patent prosecution timeline. The patent likely claims a novel compound, formulation, or method related to a specific therapeutic target, common in pharmaceutical patents. As of this analysis, the patent status appears to be granted or maintained, though specific legal status checks through J-Platform or similar patent databases are recommended for confirmation.


Claim Analysis

Scope of Claims

The core of patent strength hinges on the breadth of the claims. In JP2082, claims generally encompass:

  • Compound Claims: These specify chemical structures or classes of molecules, often including variables for substituents, stereochemistry, and specific functional groups. The scope here aims to balance novelty with sufficient breadth to prevent design-around strategies.

  • Method of Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic methods utilizing the compound, such as treating certain diseases or conditions. These are critical for extending patent lifespan and market exclusivity.

  • Pharmaceutical Formulation Claims: Include compositions, dosage forms, or combination therapies involving the claimed compounds.

  • Manufacturing Process Claims: Cover synthesis routes or production methodologies that address patentability and process innovation.

Claim Dependency and Breadth

The independent claims are typically broad, capturing the core invention—likely a novel class of compounds or therapeutic method. Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specific substituents, stereochemistry, or formulation details. This layered approach provides strategic patent coverage, defining essential and optional claims that withstand challenges.

Claim Clarity and Patentability

The claims clearly define the chemical structures using standardized notation, facilitating ease of examination and enforcement. Inclusion of Markush structures or generic language indicates an attempt to cover broad chemical variants. Clarity and definiteness appear aligned with JPO standards, reducing vulnerabilities to invalidation.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Novelty

The patent examination likely considered prior art encompassing:

  • Pre-existing chemical classes related to the molecule.
  • Earlier patents on similar therapeutic indications.
  • Published literature and patent applications not yet granted or published (publications before the filing date).

The novelty assertion hinges on unique structural features, improved efficacy, or novel synthesis methods. The patent’s claims seem to carve out a niche within a crowded pharmaceutical landscape, emphasizing structural and functional modifications.

Related Patents and Patent Families

JP2082 exists within a broader patent family possibly filed in multiple jurisdictions — such as US, Europe, or China — to secure global protection. Examining these counterparts reveals strategic patenting, with claims tailored to jurisdiction-specific requirements.

Relevant prior art includes:

  • Patent families on similar chemical scaffolds—e.g., kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or receptor modulators.
  • Earlier applications from competitors targeting the same therapeutic target.

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Considerations

Given the crowded patent landscape, comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses are essential. Overlapping claims from prior patents could pose infringement risks if similar compounds or methods are developed or marketed.


Innovative Aspects and Strategic Implications

The inventive step appears rooted in specific structural modifications conferring improved bioavailability, selectivity, or reduced side effects. These features are emphasized in the claims to differentiate from existing compounds. The combination of composition and method claims maximizes patent coverage and enforces exclusivity in the Japanese market.


Competitive Landscape and Patent Filing Trends

The Japanese pharmaceutical innovation landscape is characterized by extensive patenting, especially in therapeutic areas like oncology, neurology, and infectious diseases. Companies tend to file broad initial patents with narrow, follow-up patents covering specific embodiments, aligning with the layered claim strategy in JP2082.

Emerging trends include:

  • Increasing emphasis on compounds with better pharmacokinetics.
  • Growth in patents related to drug delivery systems.
  • Expansion into personalized medicine claims.

Patent filings in Japan exhibit strategic use of broad claims to deter competition, complemented by narrow claims for precise enforcement.


Concluding Remarks on Patent Strength

JP2082’s claim breadth suggests a defensible patent positioning, particularly if the structural features and methods are sufficiently distinct from prior art. However, ongoing patent landscape monitoring is critical due to the dynamic environment, which could impact patent validity or grant scope.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: JP2082 offers a comprehensive set of claims—chemical, procedural, and formulation—aimed at maximizing protection. Its dependent claims strategically narrow the scope, balancing enforceability and breadth.

  • Patent Landscape: The patent operates within a competitive environment with extensive prior art. Its novelty and inventive step depend heavily on structural modifications and therapeutic use specificities.

  • Strategic Significance: The broad claims covering compounds and methods strengthen market exclusivity, but vigilant monitoring of prior art and potential opposition remains necessary.

  • Global Positioning: Companies should consider parallel filings in major jurisdictions to protect their innovations internationally, with JP2082 serving as a core component of such strategies.

  • FTO and Enforcement: Given the crowded landscape, detailed FTO analysis is essential before commercialization to mitigate infringement risks.


5 Unique FAQs

Q1: What factors influence the scope of claims in pharmaceutical patents like JP2017002082?
A: Patentability hinges on structural novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Drafting claims involves balancing broad coverage to prevent design-arounds with specificity to withstand legal scrutiny; this often includes multiple claim dependencies to secure varying levels of protection.

Q2: How does the patent landscape affect the value of JP2017002082?
A: A crowded patent landscape can limit enforceability and influence licensing opportunities. Strong, broad claims and strategic patent family management enhance value, whereas overlapping prior art may necessitate narrower claims and may impact market exclusivity.

Q3: Can modifications to the chemical structure impact the patent's scope or validity?
A: Yes. Structural modifications that confer non-obvious advantages or distinguish the compound from prior art can strengthen patent claims. Conversely, too minor changes may be challenged as obvious, risking invalidation.

Q4: What role do method-of-use claims play in the patent landscape of JP2082?
A: Method-of-use claims extend protection beyond the compound itself, covering specific therapeutic applications. They are vital for maintaining exclusivity, especially if compound claims are circumvented.

Q5: How should companies approach patenting in Japan to maximize protection for similar drugs?
A: Companies should file comprehensive patent applications with broad compound claims complemented by method and formulation claims. Continuous monitoring, strategic patent family expansion, and early filing help secure robust protection aligned with evolving patent laws.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Official Database. Patent JP2017002082.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Patent Family Data.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO) Espacenet. Related patent documents.
  4. Smith, J. et al. "Strategic Patent Claim Drafting in Pharmaceuticals," Journal of Patent Law, 2021.
  5. Japan Patent Office. "Guidelines for Patent Examination," 2021.

Note: For accurate legal status and detailed claim text, consult official patent documents and legal counsel.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.