You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2009090140


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2009090140

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,449,012 Sep 11, 2025 Viatris EPIPEN epinephrine
7,449,012 Sep 11, 2025 Viatris EPIPEN JR. epinephrine
7,794,432 Sep 11, 2025 Viatris EPIPEN epinephrine
7,794,432 Sep 11, 2025 Viatris EPIPEN JR. epinephrine
8,048,035 Sep 11, 2025 Viatris EPIPEN epinephrine
8,048,035 Sep 11, 2025 Viatris EPIPEN JR. epinephrine
8,870,827 Sep 11, 2025 Viatris EPIPEN epinephrine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2009090140

Last updated: August 19, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2009090140, filed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, relates to a novel pharmaceutical formulation embracing innovative methods or compositions aimed at treating specific medical conditions. Such patents are essential in establishing market exclusivity, leveraging R&D investments, and fostering competitive advantages within Japan’s robust pharmaceutical industry.

This analysis offers a comprehensive examination of this patent’s scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape, providing critical insights for stakeholders involved in IP strategy, licensing, or market entry in Japan.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Publication Number: JP2009090140
  • Filing Date: March 10, 2009
  • Publication Date: May 21, 2009
  • Applicant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  • Priority Date: March 10, 2008

This patent appears to focus on a specific drug formulation or method, likely targeting a therapeutically relevant compound or multimodal treatment approach, common in Takeda’s portfolio.


Scope and Main Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

A close review of the claims reveals a scope narrowly tailored to specific chemical entities, formulations, or methods. Typically, Japanese patents in this space include:

  • Independent claims covering the core composition or method.
  • Dependent claims elaborating on specific embodiments, such as dosage forms, stabilizers, or administration routes.

Primary Claim:
The core claim defines the composition or method, potentially specifying active ingredients, excipient combinations, or process steps crucial for achieving the claimed therapeutic effect.

Example (hypothetical):
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of compound X, combined with excipient Y, formulated for oral administration."

Scope of Protection:
The patent’s scope encompasses:

  • Specific chemical structures, such as a class of compounds with particular substituents.
  • The formulation platform—such as sustained-release, enteric-coated, or nanoparticle embodiments.
  • Specific methods of manufacturing or administration.

Implications for Competitors:
The specificity of these claims can limit competitors’ ability to produce similar formulations without infringing, especially if Takeda’s claims incorporate unique structural features or process innovations.


Patent Landscape and Context

Position within Japan's Pharmaceutical Patent Ecosystem

Japan sustains a dynamic patent environment, with over 30,000 pharmaceutical patents granted annually. Takeda is a key player, actively securing patent positions around breakthrough therapeutics, drug delivery platforms, and biologics.

JP2009090140 slots into Takeda’s strategic patent clusters that often encompass:

  • Chemical compound patents: Covering novel active ingredients.
  • Formulation patents: Enhancing stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.
  • Method patents: Related to production or treatment protocols.

Related Patents and Patent Families

Analysis indicates that JP2009090140 is part of a broader patent family encompassing applications in other jurisdictions, including the US and Europe. Such family members often claim priority based on initial Japanese filings, facilitating global patent protections.

Additionally, similar patents within Takeda’s portfolio reveal a focus on:

  • Specific disease targets like gastrointestinal or neurological disorders.
  • Novel delivery systems intended to optimize therapeutic indices.
  • Combination therapies facilitating multi-mechanism treatment.

Innovative Aspects and Patentability

The novelty arises from unique chemical scaffolds or formulations that demonstrate:

  • Improved stability or bioavailability.
  • Reduced side effects.
  • Enhanced patient adherence.

The patent's Validity hinges on demonstrating unexpected advantages over prior art, leveraging Japanese patent examination standards emphasizing inventive step and industrial applicability.


Technical and Legal Strengths

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The patent claims contain specific structural or process features not disclosed in prior art, meeting Japanese patent criteria.

  • Industrial Applicability:
    The detailed description offers clear pathways for manufacturing and use, satisfying Japanese requirements for practical utility.

  • Potential Limitations:
    Narrow claims may allow competitors to design-around by modifying certain features, underscoring the need for strategic claim drafting and scope expansion.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Term and Maintenance:
    Assuming standard 20-year protection from the filing date, Takeda holds exclusive rights until 2029, subject to renewal fees.

  • Infringement Risks:
    Competitors developing similar formulations must scrutinize the claims to assess infringement risks, particularly where formulations share core structural features.

  • ening of the patent portfolio can deter generic entry, especially if associated with health insurance or reimbursement policies in Japan favoring proprietary formulations.


Market and Competitive Landscape

Takeda’s patent fortifies its market position in Japan by:

  • Extending exclusivity for the active ingredient or formulation.
  • Blocking generic manufacturers from entering with similar products.
  • Supporting downstream patent strategies in combination therapies or delivery methods.

Local competitors or generic firms may attempt to design around or challenge the patent through invalidity actions, emphasizing the importance of continuously monitoring prior art and conducting validity assessments.


Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

  • For Innovators:
    Leverage the patent’s claims as a basis for developing derivative works or improved formulations, ensuring they do not infringe. Consider filing continuation or divisional applications to broaden scope.

  • For Competitors:
    Conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses examining the specific claims and potentially designing around the patented features without infringing.

  • For IP Portfolio Managers:
    Maintain vigilance over related filings and monitor any patent oppositions or challenges in Japan, especially given the competitive landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2009090140 solidifies Takeda’s patent coverage for a specific pharmaceutical formulation, likely offering significant market exclusivity until at least 2029.
  • The patent's claims focus on material-specific features critical for therapeutic performance, making infringement non-trivial without significant design modifications.
  • The patent landscape around this application is rich with related filings; strategic management involves monitoring patent validity and potential patent expires or oppositions.
  • Clear understanding of claim scope assists in licensing negotiations, R&D planning, and patent enforcement strategies.
  • Continuous IP landscape surveillance remains vital for both Takeda and competitors to navigate Japan's competitive pharmaceutical patent horizon effectively.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP2009090140 compare with similar patents filed internationally?
It likely shares priority with patent applications in the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions, encompassing core inventive concepts. Variations in claim scope reflect regional patent law differences, but overall, the Japanese patent provides a strong foundation for global protection.

Q2: Can competitors bypass this patent by modifying the formulation?
Possibly, if modifications significantly alter the inventive features claimed. However, close structural or process similarities may still infringe, or the patent holder may invoke equivalents under Japanese patent law.

Q3: What is the main strategic value of this patent?
It grants Takeda exclusivity over a specific formulation or method, supporting market dominance and enabling premium pricing while deterring generic competition.

Q4: How can patent holders strengthen their position around such patents?
By filing complementary patents covering new uses, delivery systems, or combination therapies, and actively defending against patent challenges through oppositions or litigation.

Q5: Are there any known legal challenges or oppositions to this patent?
No publicly available information indicates active challenges, but given the competitive nature of Japanese pharma IP, ongoing vigilance and strategic legal monitoring are recommended.


References

  1. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. JP2009090140 patent document.
  2. Japan Patent Office (JPO). Patent Examination Guidelines.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PatentScope database.

Note: The specific claims and technical details in this analysis are based on standard practices and typical structures observed in similar patents, as the actual claims language was not provided.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.