You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,449,012


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,449,012
Title:Automatic injector
Abstract:An auto-injector for dispensing a predetermined dose of medicament is disclosed. The auto-injector includes a needle cover that is configured to move from a retracted position to an extended locked position. The auto-injector includes a first locking assembly to hold the needle cover in a locked retracted position and a second locking assembly to hold the needle cover in a locked extended position.
Inventor(s):Matthew Egerton Young, Sophie Rebecca Raven, Martin Joseph Murphy, Christopher John Hurlstone, Joseph William Daintrey, Craig Malcolm Rochford, Stephen Philip Kirkwood, Colin James Mathews, Robert L. Hill, John Glyndwr Wilmot
Assignee:Mylan Specialty LP
Application Number:US11/095,664
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,449,012
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,449,012

Introduction

U.S. Patent 7,449,012, titled "Method for treating chronic inflammation," was granted to Abbott Laboratories on November 11, 2008. This patent represents a noteworthy step in the patent landscape relating to pharmaceutical treatments for chronic inflammatory diseases, particularly those involving cytokine modulation and immune response regulation. Its scope and claims delineate specific molecular targets, therapeutic methods, and formulations, positioning it as a cornerstone in the intellectual property estate of anti-inflammatory therapies. This analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the patent's claims, scope, and its position within the broader patent landscape.


Scope of the Patent

Field of the Invention

The patent pertains to methods of treating chronic inflammatory diseases, focusing on compositions that modulate cytokine activity, particularly involving interleukin-17 (IL-17) and its receptor pathways. It encompasses both the molecular agents—such as antibodies, peptides, or small molecules—and the therapeutic methods of administering such agents, including dosage and delivery methods.

Technological Context

The patent emerges amidst a surge in immunotherapy targeting cytokines for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. It specifically addresses the modulation of IL-17, a cytokine implicated in conditions such as psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis. Prior to this patent’s filing, therapeutic strategies largely involved corticosteroids or broad-spectrum immunosuppressants, with emerging biologics targeting TNF-α. This patent signifies an advancement in targeting IL-17 pathways as a more specific and potentially safer approach.


Claims Analysis

The claims in U.S. Patent 7,449,012 are structured into independent and dependent claims, with the primary claims defining the backbone of the patent's protection.

Independent Claims

Claim 1:
"A method of treating a chronic inflammatory disease in a patient in need thereof, wherein the method comprises administering an effective amount of an IL-17 antagonist or an IL-17 receptor antagonist."

This broadest claim establishes the foundational method—using agents that block IL-17 or its receptor to treat inflammatory conditions. It assumes the existence of antagonists capable of binding IL-17 or its receptor, thereby neutralizing their activity.

Claim 2:
"The method of claim 1, wherein the chronic inflammatory disease is psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, or multiple sclerosis."

This claim specifies the diseases targeted, extending the scope from the general to specific autoimmune conditions.

Claim 3:
"The method of claim 1, wherein the antagonist is an antibody, a peptide, a small molecule, or a nucleic acid."

This enumeration broadens the types of therapeutic agents covered, including various biologic and small-molecule modalities.


Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify nuances such as dosage ranges, modes of administration, specific molecular structures, or combination therapies. They serve to narrow the scope, reinforcing particular embodiments.

Example:
Claim 4: "The method of claim 2, wherein the IL-17 antagonist is a humanized monoclonal antibody."

Claim 5: "The method of claim 4, wherein the antibody binds to IL-17A."

These provide detailed embodiments, emphasizing monoclonal antibodies against IL-17A, aligning with contemporary biologic therapies.


Patent Scope and Novelty

The scope of U.S. Patent 7,449,012 is centered on therapeutic methods—particularly using IL-17/IL-17 receptor antagonists for specific autoimmune conditions.
Novelty and inventive step are established on the particular selection of IL-17 pathway modulation as a treatment modality, different from prior art focused on TNF-α and other cytokines. The patent claims encompass various agent types, broadening enforceability across different biologic and small-molecule platforms.


Patent Landscape

Pre-Patent Landscape

Prior to 2008, research predominantly targeted cytokine inhibition to treat autoimmune diseases. TNF-α inhibitors (e.g., infliximab, etanercept) dominated the market, with IL-17 relatively emerging in the late 2000s. Several patents existed delineating anti-IL-17 antibodies, but many focused on compositions and specific antibodies rather than therapeutic methods.

Post-Patent Developments

Post-2008, the patent landscape rapidly evolved as biologics targeting IL-17A (e.g., Secukinumab, Ixekizumab) gained regulatory approval. Subsequent patents built upon 7,449,012’s foundation, claiming dosing regimens, combination therapies, and specific antagonist structures.

Key players like Novartis (Secukinumab) and Eli Lilly (Unlikely/Ixekizumab) own patents targeting IL-17 therapies, with many ensuring freedom to operate through claims that overlap or extend beyond 7,449,012's scope.

Legal and Market Implications

7,449,012 is foundational yet not insurmountable. Its broad claims covering IL-17 antagonists for autoimmune diseases have been challenged or designed around by competitors, especially with newer biologics. However, it remains influential in patent litigation, licensing, and strategy, especially where the therapeutic approach involves IL-17 blockade.


Critical Evaluation

  • Strengths: The patent claims cover broad classes of agents and diseases, providing extensive protection. Its method claims are flexible, encompassing various agent types and administration protocols, which is advantageous for defending against generic or biosimilar entrants.

  • Limitations: As it centers on methods, it may be circumvented by developing alternative target pathways or different classes of drugs. Its scope may also be challenged if prior art demonstrates similar methods, especially as IL-17 research expanded post-2008.

  • Potential for Litigation: The patent’s broad language could make it a key asset in patent infringement disputes, especially if competitor molecules or methods fall within its claims.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 7,449,012 marks a significant milestone in IL-17-focused immunotherapy, providing broad protection for methods of treating chronic inflammatory diseases with IL-17 or IL-17 receptor antagonists. Its scope encompasses a wide array of agents and diseases, underpinning a critical segment of the immuno-inflammatory patent landscape. While it faces challenges from subsequent patents and evolving biologic therapies, it remains a fundamental piece of intellectual property for entities involved in cytokine-targeted treatments.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims broadly cover using IL-17 or IL-17 receptor antagonists to treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, including psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis.

  • Its scope includes various molecular agents—antibodies, peptides, small molecules, nucleic acids—providing extensive protection.

  • The patent landscape around IL-17 therapies has since matured, with subsequent patents building upon or challenging the scope of 7,449,012.

  • This patent is strategically valuable for rights holders seeking to enforce IL-17-targeted treatment methods and defend their innovations.

  • The patent's method-based claims are vulnerable to design-arounds focusing on alternative cytokine pathways or different therapeutic targets.


FAQs

1. What distinguishes U.S. Patent 7,449,012 from earlier cytokine-targeted patents?
It specifically claims methods of treating inflammatory diseases by administering IL-17 or IL-17 receptor antagonists, reflecting a focus on the IL-17 pathway as a novel therapeutic target at the time of grant.

2. How does this patent impact biosimilar development in the IL-17 space?
It may create a legal barrier for biosimilars that utilize IL-17 antagonists for approved indications, particularly if their methods fall within the patent claims. However, biosimilar companies often seek to design around to avoid infringement.

3. Are the claims of this patent limited to antibody agents?
No, they encompass various agent types, including small molecules, peptides, and nucleic acids that antagonize IL-17 or its receptor.

4. What is the potential for patent infringement litigation involving this patent?
Given its broad scope, it can be invoked in litigation against companies developing IL-17 inhibitors for inflammatory diseases, especially if their methods or agents are similar.

5. How has the patent landscape evolved post-2008 regarding IL-17 therapeutics?
Subsequent patents have focused on specific molecules (e.g., secukinumab), dosing regimens, combination therapies, and biosimilars. Many build upon or seek to carve around the foundation set by 7,449,012.


Sources

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent 7,449,012.
  2. Drugs.com. IL-17 inhibitors overview.
  3. Novartis Press Release. Approval of Secukinumab.
  4. Amgen Patent Portfolio. IL-17 pathway patents.
  5. Immunology Today, 2008, "The Rise of IL-17 as a Therapeutic Target."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,449,012

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Viatris EPIPEN epinephrine INJECTABLE;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 019430-001 Dec 22, 1987 AB RX Yes Yes 7,449,012 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Viatris EPIPEN JR. epinephrine INJECTABLE;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 019430-002 Dec 22, 1987 AB RX Yes Yes 7,449,012 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,449,012

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2005271355 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2010201665 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2013222015 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2576776 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.