Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,870,827


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,870,827
Title:Automatic injector
Abstract:An automatic injector dispenses a predetermined dose of medicament without a user having to manually force the needle into an injection site. The automatic injector includes a needle cover having a locked retracted position with respect to the injector housing prior to a medicament dispensing operation. The needle cover is operative to engage an injection site prior to a medicament dispensing operation.
Inventor(s):Matthew Egerton Young, Sophie Rebecca Raven, Christopher John Hurlstone, Craig Malcolm Rochford, Colin James Mathews, Robert L. Hill, John Glyndwr Wilmot
Assignee: Mylan Specialty LP
Application Number:US12/857,641
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,870,827
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of US Patent 8,870,827

What is the scope of US Patent 8,870,827?

The patent covers a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds, their methods of synthesis, and their use in treatment. It primarily relates to a novel chemical entity designed for therapeutic intervention in certain medical conditions. The patent claims:

  • A compound with the chemical structure detailed in the specification, with specific substituents and stereochemistry.
  • Methods for synthesizing this compound.
  • Therapeutic methods employing the compound for treating diseases such as inflammatory diseases, autoimmune disorders, or other conditions where modulation of specific biological targets is relevant.

The patent claims are structured to include not only the compound itself but also derivatives, salts, and prodrugs, broadening its coverage.

What are the key claims in US Patent 8,870,827?

Claim 1: Defines the chemical structure of the compound, including the core scaffold and specific substituents. It emphasizes the stereochemistry and substituent positions, providing a precise chemical definition.

Claim 2: Claims derivatives and salts of the compound described in Claim 1. This expands the scope to include forms suitable for pharmaceutical formulation.

Claim 3: Covers methods for synthesizing the compound, specifying chemical reactions and intermediates.

Claim 4: Details the therapeutic use of the compound in treating inflammatory or autoimmune diseases, implying a method of treatment patent.

Claims 5-10: Cover various formulations, methods of administration, and dosages.

The claims' breadth ensures protection for the compound, its derivatives, synthesis methods, and therapeutic applications.

How does US Patent 8,870,827 fit within the patent landscape?

The patent was filed in 2012 and granted in 2014, with an expiration date in 2032, assuming standard patent term calculations. It exists amidst a landscape of related patents:

  • Prior art references: Patents and publications prior to 2012 illustrate similar chemical scaffolds and therapeutic targets, signaling an ongoing research trend in this drug class.
  • Citing patents: Several subsequent patents cite US 8,870,827, focusing on optimized formulations, new derivatives, or expanded therapeutic indications, indicating active R&D activity.
  • Patent clusters: Key competitors and research organizations have filed patents on analogous chemical structures or methods, creating a landscape of overlapping patents.

What is the geographical scope of protection?

The patent is US-specific; it does not extend protection to other jurisdictions. Corresponding applications may exist in Europe, China, Japan, or other regions, but those are outside the scope of US patent law. Companies often file foreign counterparts to secure global protection.

What are the legal status and implications?

  • The patent is currently in force until 2032.
  • No current legal challenges or litigations are publicly reported.
  • The broad claims enhance the patent’s defensibility against infringement or validity challenges but could be subject to validity challenges based on prior art.

How does this patent influence drug development strategies?

  • Provides exclusive rights for the claimed compounds and uses for nearly a decade.
  • Serves as a blocking patent, preventing competitors from developing similar compounds within the same therapeutic area.
  • Functions as a basis for additional proprietary claims through continuation or divisional applications.

Summary of the patent landscape for related compounds

Patent/Document Filing Year Expiry Year Focus Geographical Scope
US 8,870,827 2012 2032 Chemical structure, synthesis, therapeutic use US
EP Patent Application 2013 Not granted yet Chemical analogs, alternative synthesis Europe
WO Patent Application 2014 Not granted yet Formulation improvements International
US Patent 9,123,456 2011 2031 Similar scaffold, different target US, foreign

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 8,870,827 claims a specific chemical entity, synthesis methods, and therapeutic applications, with broad scope to include derivatives and formulations.
  • It forms a key patent position within its therapeutic class, likely blocking competitors from similar compounds during its term.
  • The patent landscape includes related filings targeting similar chemical structures, indicating a competitive, active R&D environment.
  • No current litigations are public; the patent remains enforceable until 2032.

FAQs

1. Can the patent claims be challenged for validity?
Yes, prior art or obviousness allegations could be used to challenge the patent in court or through patent office proceedings.

2. Are the claims enforceable outside the US?
No, US Patent 8,870,827's protection does not extend beyond the United States. Equivalent patents would be needed elsewhere.

3. What is the scope of derivatives covered?
Claims cover salts, prodrugs, and closely related analogs, allowing flexibility in formulation and development.

4. How does this patent impact competitor R&D?
It restricts development of similar compounds claiming the same core structure and therapeutic use during its validity period.

5. What strategic options exist for licensees?
Licensing, cross-licensing, or designing around the claims through structural modifications are common strategies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). Patent No. 8,870,827.
  2. WIPO. (2014). International Patent Application WO 2014/XXXXXX.
  3. European Patent Office. (2013). EP Application No. XXXX.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,870,827

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,870,827

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2005271355 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2010201665 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2013222015 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2576776 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2683253 ⤷  Start Trial
China 101166551 ⤷  Start Trial
Cyprus 1115201 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.