You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20131233


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20131233

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,268,847 Oct 18, 2029 Actelion OPSUMIT macitentan
8,268,847 Oct 18, 2029 Actelion OPSYNVI macitentan; tadalafil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Patent HRP20131233

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Patent HRP20131233, granted in Croatia, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that falls within a critical segment of drug development and patenting—defining the scope of protection, assessing claim robustness, and understanding the patent landscape surrounding it. This analysis provides a comprehensive review driven by patent jurisprudence, claim interpretation, and strategic positioning within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: HRP20131233
Filing Date: (Assuming based on typical patent timelines, roughly 2012)
Grant Date: (Likely after examination, approximately 2013 or later)
Application Status: Likely granted and in force, considering current relevance and filing timeline.

Note: Specific details such as inventor, applicant, and detailed patent description are typically obtained from Croatia’s Intellectual Property Office (SROP) or global patent databases like EPO or WIPO. For this analysis, these are assumed as background information.


Scope of the Patent: A Structural Overview

The patent’s scope encloses the protection of a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. Given typical drug patenting strategies, the scope can be classified into:

1. Compound Claims (Composition of Matter)

Claims cover the chemical structure or a closely related class of molecules, emphasizing novelty and inventive step. These claims generally specify:

  • The core molecular framework.
  • Functional groups or substituents.
  • Purity and stereochemistry features.

Example: “A compound represented by the following chemical formula X, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, or stereoisomer thereof.”

2. Formulation and Dosage Claims

Claims extend protection to specific formulations, delivery systems, or dosage regimes. These can be crucial for therapeutic efficacy and patent life extension.

3. Method Claims (Therapeutic or Manufacturing Methods)

Claims might define a specific therapeutic method, like administering a compound to treat a disease, which often enhances patent robustness.

4. Use Claims (Second or Swiss-type Claims)

Claims may cover the novel use of the compound for treating specific indications, a common strategy to broaden scope, especially when compound claims face prior art obstacles.

Key Features of the Scope

  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims: The patent must balance detailed, specific claims with broader claims to protect the core innovation while resisting invalidation.
  • Dependent Claims: Likely include multiple dependent claims narrowing the invention, providing fallback positions.
  • Markush Claims: Use of Markush structures for chemical group variation, to cover multiple derivatives.

Claim Analysis: Robustness and Strategy

1. Clarity and Support

Croatian patent law aligns with EPC standards, requiring claims to be clear and supported by the description. The claims should:

  • Precisely define the chemical entities, methods, or formulations.
  • Be supported by experimental data demonstrating utility.

2. Novelty and Inventive Step

For grant, claims must demonstrate:

  • Novelty: The compound or method must not have been disclosed publicly before the filing date.
  • Inventive Step: Non-obviousness to a person skilled in the art, considering prior art references.

In drug patents, establishing inventive step often hinges on a demonstrated unexpected therapeutic effect or a unique chemical modification.

3. Patentable Subject Matter

Croatian law follows European standards, allowing patenting of new chemical entities and their medical applications, provided they satisfy inventive and industrial applicability criteria.

4. Scope Limitations

Potential claim limitations include:

  • Prior Art Barriers: Overlap with existing compounds or therapies may restrict claim breadth.
  • Exclusions: Naturally occurring substances or known methods may be excluded or require claims to specify a novel use or formulation.

5. Patent Lifespan and Supplementary Protection

The patent provides exclusive rights typically for 20 years from the filing date. Pharmaceutical patents are often extended via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) under EU law, enhancing market exclusivity.


Patent Landscape of Drug Patent HRP20131233

Understanding the patent landscape involves analyzing overlapping patents, patent families, and competitive innovation:

1. Similar Patents in Croatia and Europe

  • Many pharmaceutical innovations are part of patent families corresponding to international applications (PCT or EU filings).
  • European Patent Office (EPO) databases reveal family members, which can extend or complement Croatian patent rights.

2. Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Prior art typically includes earlier chemical patents, publications, or known therapeutic methods.
  • Novelty assessment considers these references, especially for chemical structures and therapeutic uses.

3. Active Patent Ecosystem

  • Patent filings in neighboring jurisdictions (EU, US, Asia) may influence Croatia’s patent’s enforceability.
  • Existing patents from competitors can signal challenged patent validity or license opportunities.

4. Patent Obstacles and Opportunities

  • Potential “thickets”—clusters of overlapping patents—may complicate commercialization.
  • Broad claims and strategic claim amendments increase enforceability.
  • Patent prosecution history may provide insight into avenues for future claims or divisions.

Strategic Considerations for Patent Holders and Stakeholders

For Patent Holders

  • Enforceability: Ensure claims are robust against prior art and challengers.
  • Patent Life Optimization: Seek SPC extensions or additional patents covering formulations or new indications.
  • Global Strategy: Coordinate with international filings to expand protection.

For Competitors

  • Freedom-to-Operate Analysis: Examine overlapping patents to assess market entry risks.
  • Infringement Risks: Monitor the scope of claims to avoid infringement or prepare invalidation strategies.

For Licensing and Collaboration

  • Patent scope informs license negotiations and potential joint ventures, especially in unmet medical areas.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: The Croatian patent HRP20131233 likely encompasses a chemical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic uses, with claim language balancing breadth and specificity.
  • Claim Strength: The robustness of the patent hinges on clear, supported claims demonstrating novelty and inventive step, especially for chemical structures and methods.
  • Landscape Positioning: It exists within a competitive ecosystem of overlapping patents and prior art, requiring ongoing monitoring for validity and freedom-to-operate.
  • Strategic Value: The patent provides a foundation for extending market exclusivity through SPCs and auxiliary patents, especially when aligned with broader European patent rights.

FAQs

Q1: How can I determine if the patent claims are enforceable?
A: Conduct a detailed claim construction analysis, compare claims with prior art, and assess the clarity, support, and inventive step. Legal challenges or oppositions can also test enforceability.

Q2: What strategies can extend the patent protection for this drug?
A: Filing supplementary patents on formulations, new therapeutic uses, manufacturing processes, or obtaining SPCs can prolong market exclusivity.

Q3: How does this patent landscape impact generic drug development?
A: Overlapping patents and narrow claims may complicate generic entry; comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis is essential.

Q4: Can Croatian patent law influence international patent strategies?
A: Yes, as Croatia is an EPC member, patent strategies often mirror European procedures, and national patents can support broader European patent portfolios.

Q5: What are the risks associated with patent invalidation?
A: Prior art challenges, claims overbreadth, or lack of inventive step can lead to invalidation, affecting market exclusivity and licensing opportunities.


References

  1. Croatian Intellectual Property Office (SROP). [Link to patent database]
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent family databases.
  3. European Patent Convention (EPC) Standards on patentability.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent search tools.
  5. Recent jurisprudence and patent law updates in Croatia and the EU.

Note: For a precise, case-specific assessment, accessing the full patent documentation, prosecution history, and relevant prior art databases is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.