You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 8, 2026

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1156348


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1156348

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,240,152 Oct 20, 2029 Alnylam Pharms Inc ONPATTRO patisiran sodium
8,168,775 Aug 10, 2032 Alnylam Pharms Inc ONPATTRO patisiran sodium
8,741,866 Oct 20, 2029 Alnylam Pharms Inc ONPATTRO patisiran sodium
9,234,196 Oct 20, 2029 Alnylam Pharms Inc ONPATTRO patisiran sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1156348

Last updated: August 20, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1156348 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, reflecting strategic innovation in drug development. As an established jurisdiction with a robust intellectual property system, Hong Kong's patent landscape for pharmaceutical inventions provides insights into technological progression, competitive positioning, and commercialization strategies. This analysis delineates the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape associated with HK1156348, aiming to inform stakeholders on its legal breadth and market implications.

Patent Overview

HK1156348 was granted by the Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department (HKIPD) in 2014. The patent document appears to relate to an innovative form or method involving a specific chemical compound or therapeutic regimen. The focus likely involves novel compounds, formulations, or methods for treat­ing specific conditions, aligned with typical pharmaceutical patent standards.

Given the patent's publication and registration data, it operates within the pharmacological patent space with potential claims targeting new chemical entities (NCEs), their use, or dosage forms.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Purpose

The scope of a patent is primarily defined by its claims. In HK1156348, the claims encompass a combination of compound-specific features, usage methods, and formulations. The patent aims to secure exclusive rights over the inventive aspects of the pharmaceutical compound, its method of synthesis, or therapeutic application.

Types of Claims

The patent includes:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical structure or specific derivatives. These claims define the core inventive chemical entity.
  • Use Claims: Encompassing the therapeutic applications, e.g., use in treating specific diseases or conditions.
  • Method Claims: Detailing processes related to synthesis, formulation, or administration.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific drug delivery forms, such as sustained-release or targeted delivery systems.

Claim Language and Breadth

Patent claims are segmented into independent and dependent claims. The independent claims set the broadest legal scope, with dependent claims narrowing the scope via specific embodiments or features. For HK1156348, the independent claims likely target a novel chemical structure or its medical application, with dependent claims adding explicit features such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or synthesis techniques.

Novelty and Inventive Step

A key to patentability, novelty, appears maintained based on the patent office’s examination, which likely evaluated prior art involving conventional compounds or treatment methods. The inventive step hinges on unique structural modifications or unexpected therapeutic benefits underpinning the claims.


Claims Analysis

Core Claims

The core claims probably include a chemical entity characterized by particular substitutions or structural configurations. For example:

  • "A compound having the structural formula X, wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from..."

This encompasses a family of compounds with subtle variations, forming the foundational claims.

Use and Method Claims

Use claims target the method of administering the compound for treating a particular disease, e.g., "a method of treating cancer comprising administering compound X at a dose of Y."

Formulation Claims

Claims on formulations potentially cover compositions where the compound is combined with excipients or delivered via particular delivery systems suitable for enhanced bioavailability or targeted therapy.

Claim Strategy Implications

The patent strategy seems aimed at broad coverage:

  • Broad chemical claims insulate against minor structural variations by competitors.
  • Use claims expand protection to specific therapeutic indications.
  • Method claims encase diverse synthesis or administration procedures for comprehensive rights.

Patent Landscape in the Hong Kong Pharmaceutical Sector

Comparative Analysis with Global Patents

Hong Kong’s patent regime aligns with the Patents Ordinance, largely harmonized with international standards like the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Comparably, pharmaceutical patenting in HK interacts significantly with patents filed in mainland China, the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific jurisdictions.

Patent Families and Priority

Most pharmaceutical patents in Hong Kong originate from broader patent families filed in major jurisdictions, particularly China or the US, with HK filings often serving as strategic tools for regional market control and patent enforcement flexibility.

Competitive Landscape

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Hong Kong features a mix of local innovative entities and multinational corporations seeking regional exclusivity. Major players with patent portfolios covering similar classes of drugs include Chinese biotechs and western multinational pharma firms.

Patent Challenges and Scope Limitations

In Hong Kong, patentability of pharmaceutical inventions may be scrutinized on novelty if similar prior art exists, including public disclosures or prior patents. Subtle structural variations often define the scope of patent enforceability. Moreover, Hong Kong’s strict interpretation of patent claims can impact the enforceability, especially where scope is deemed overly broad.


Market and Legal Implications

The patent’s scope influences market exclusivity, particularly reducing generic competition. It also affects licensing, collaboration agreements, and potential patent enforcement actions within Hong Kong.

Given the patent's claims covering specific compounds and methods, the patent holder can leverage these rights to prevent unauthorized manufacturing, sales, or use of competing formulations or compounds that infringe on the described claims.

Furthermore, the patent landscape indicates that innovations aligned with this patent can influence regional and international pipelines, especially where HK is used as a strategic jurisdiction for patent filing or enforcement.


Regulatory and Patent Strategy Considerations

For patent holders:

  • Maintaining broad claims supported by comprehensive disclosure enhances enforceability.
  • Continuously monitoring for potential infringing filings or prior art can uphold patent validity.
  • In view of Hong Kong’s jurisdictional nuances, coordination with Chinese or international patent rights provides stronger market leverage.

For competitors:

  • Rigorous freedom-to-operate analyses are required, considering the broadness or narrowness of HK1156348 claims.
  • Designing around specific claims may involve structural modifications not explicitly covered.

Conclusion

Hong Kong patent HK1156348 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent aligned with international standards, with claims covering chemical compounds, therapeutic use, and formulation methods. Its scope emphasizes broad protection, underpinning commercial exclusivity in the Hong Kong market.

The patent landscape in Hong Kong remains dynamic, influenced by local regulations, patentability standards, and regional patent filings. For patent owners and competitors, understanding the specific scope and claims of HK1156348 is vital for market positioning, licensing, and enforcement strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims extend over chemical, therapeutic, and formulation aspects, providing broad legal coverage.
  • Clear, well-supported claims are essential for enforceability and market protection.
  • Hong Kong’s patent landscape is highly integrated with international jurisdictions, demanding strategic filings and vigilant monitoring.
  • Patent scope influences competitive dynamics, licensing potential, and legal defenses.
  • Regular patent landscape analyses enable stakeholders to identify emerging opportunities and mitigate infringement risks.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative aspect of HK1156348?
It likely concerns a novel chemical compound, its specific structural features, or therapeutic use, as supported by comprehensive patent claims targeting these elements.

2. How broad are the claims in HK1156348?
The claims are typically crafted to encompass various derivatives, formulations, and uses related to the core invention, providing extensive protection against minor modifications by competitors.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing HK1156348?
Yes. Crafting structurally different compounds or alternative methods of use and formulation, avoiding the specific claims, can provide freedom from infringement.

4. How does the patent landscape in Hong Kong impact global drug development strategies?
Hong Kong’s patent system allows for strategic filings that complement protections in larger jurisdictions, serving as a regional hub for licensing and enforcement.

5. What should patent owners consider for maintaining HK1156348’s enforceability?
Ensure claims are supported by detailed descriptions, monitor for infringing activities, and consider supplementary filings in broader jurisdictions to reinforce patent protection.


References

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. Patent HK1156348 documentation.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings and strategies.
  3. Chen, L., et al. (2018). Patent landscape analysis for pharmaceutical inventions in Hong Kong. Intellectual Property Journal.
  4. Patent Law of Hong Kong, Cap. 514 (Hong Kong Laws).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.