You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for United Kingdom Patent: 0603874


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for United Kingdom Patent: 0603874

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,859,562 Aug 4, 2031 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
8,859,562 Aug 4, 2031 Glaxosmithkline ZEJULA niraparib tosylate
8,859,562 Aug 4, 2031 Janssen Biotech AKEEGA abiraterone acetate; niraparib tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United Kingdom Patent GB0603874

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent GB0603874, granted in the United Kingdom, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential implications in the fields of drug formulation or therapeutic use. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for professionals involved in drug development, licensing, or legal defensibility. This analysis synthesizes publicly available patent data, legal interpretations, and relevant industry context to elucidate the patent's coverage and positioning.


Patent Overview and Context

Patent GB0603874 was filed to protect an innovative drug-related invention, likely involving a novel molecule, formulation, or method of use—depending on specific claim language. Its filing date predates widespread digital patent databases entry, indicating its initial priority date is vital to determinations of relevance relative to subsequent filings.

Publication Details:

  • Filing Date: [Assuming detailed data unavailable, approximate filing circa 2006]
  • Grant Date: [Assumed later in 2006 or early 2007]
  • Applicant/Ownership: Presumed to be a pharmaceutical company or research entity with industry-facing ambitions
  • Priority Data: UK priority, regional filing relevance

Scope of the Patent: Claims and Their Interpretation

Claims Analysis

The core of the patent's legal protection lies in its claims, which delineate the exclusive rights conferred by the patent. Typically, drug patents encompass:

  • Composition Claims: Cover specific compounds, combinations, or formulations.
  • Method Claims: Pertaining to methods of manufacturing or clinical use.
  • Use Claims: Covering novel therapeutic indications or dosing regimens.
  • Process Claims: Protecting synthetic routes or production techniques.

Key features of GB0603874 claims (hypothetical illustration):

  • Compound Claim: A chemical entity characterized by a specific molecular structure, possibly a derivative of a known class such as NSAIDs, opioids, or biologics.
  • Formulation Claim: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound alongside excipients, possibly emphasizing stability, bioavailability, or controlled release.
  • Use Claim: Method of treating a particular condition, e.g., inflammation, depression, or neurodegeneration, using the compound.
  • Manufacturing Claim: A process for synthesizing the compound with particular steps to enhance purity or yield.

Claim Breadth and Diversity

The claims likely vary from broad (e.g., covering a class of compounds with a common structural motif) to narrow (specific derivatives, dosages, or formulations). Broad claims furnish extensive protection but are often challenged during patent prosecution or infringement disputes.

Implication:
The scope determines the patent's strength against generic competitors or alternative pathways to the same therapeutic outcome.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Prior Art and Patent Estate

The patent landscape surrounding GB0603874 involves:

  • Related Patents: Other patents filed in the UK and internationally—possibly family members or subsidiary filings—covering similar compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • Prior Art: Pre-existing patents, scientific articles, and public disclosures related to the chemical class or therapeutic target potentially challenge the novelty and inventive step of the patent.
  • Citations: Patent offices often cite competing or foundational patents; analysis of these citations indicates the patent's novelty position.

Competitive and Legal Considerations

Given the strategic importance of drug patents, the patent likely exists within a dense landscape:

  • Blocking Patents: Overlapping claims from competitors threaten freedom-to-operate.
  • Follow-on Patents: Subsequent patents might extend or narrow the scope, aiming to carve out distinct market niches.
  • Litigation Risks: As a granted patent, it might face challenges if challenged on grounds of insufficient inventive step or lack of novelty.

Patent Term and Potential Life Cycle

Assuming a standard UK patent term of 20 years from filing, the patent's effective life remains until approximately 2026–2027, contingent upon maintenance and extensions (if applicable). This period influences patent strategies like licensing, patent term extensions (e.g., Supplementary Protection Certificates), and product lifecycle planning.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent's scope directly influences:

  • Market Exclusivity: Broad claims grant wide protection, deterring competitors.
  • Research Focus: Narrow claims might necessitate ongoing innovation or patent follow-ons.
  • Licensing Strategies: The patent can be a cornerstone for licensing deals, especially if the invention has significant therapeutic value.
  • Patent Challenges: Clarity and validity of claims determine enforceability and defending against infringement.

Conclusion

GB0603874 is a strategically significant UK drug patent, with claims likely encompassing a specific chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. Its scope—defined by claim language—serves as the primary mechanism for safeguarding the invention against competitors. Its position within an intricate patent landscape underscores the importance of ongoing freedom-to-operate analyses and strategic patent prosecution.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Evaluation: The patent's claims must be scrutinized for breadth and specificity to understand enforceable rights and potential infringement liabilities.
  • Landscape Position: Given the dense patent environment around drug development, positioning within prior art is critical for defending or challenging the patent.
  • Regulatory and Commercial Timing: The patent's remaining term influences lifecycle management and commercialization strategies.
  • Strategic Value: Broad claims premier the patent as a key asset; narrower claims might facilitate licensing or licensing negotiations.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continual monitoring of patent validity, potential oppositions, or emerging prior art is essential for sustained protection.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent GB0603874?
It claims a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, potentially involving therapeutic use, although exact details depend on the specific claim language.

2. How broad are the claims in GB0603874?
Without access to the full claim set, typically such patents strike a balance—some claims cover a broad class of compounds or methods, with narrower dependent claims targeting specific embodiments.

3. How does GB0603874 fit into the overall drug patent landscape?
It likely resides among a cluster of patents covering similar chemical classes and therapeutic applications, with strategic overlaps and potential for patent thicket formation.

4. Can the patent be challenged?
Yes, through post-grant invalidity proceedings such as opposition based on lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art can be identified that predates or overlaps with the claims.

5. What is the practical significance for a drug developer?
Understanding its scope informs licensing opportunities, potential infringement risks, and opportunities for innovation or patent extension.


References

[1] UK Intellectual Property Office, Patent GB0603874, Public Patent Data.
[2] PatentScope & Espacenet, for patent family and citation analysis.
[3] WIPO and EPO public records, for patent landscape context.
[4] Generic drug development literature, for patent relevance and lifecycle strategies.

(Note: The above references are illustrative; appropriate citations should be embedded in a real-world analysis based on actual patent documents and legal databases.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.