You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2704042


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2704042

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,534,281 Sep 8, 2030 Glaxo Grp Ltd BREO ELLIPTA fluticasone furoate; vilanterol trifenatate
8,534,281 Sep 8, 2030 Glaxosmithkline TRELEGY ELLIPTA fluticasone furoate; umeclidinium bromide; vilanterol trifenatate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES2704042

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Spain Patent ES2704042, granted in 2018, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, specifically a formulation or method related to a therapeutically active compound. This patent’s scope, claims, and landscape are critical for stakeholders including innovator companies, generic manufacturers, legal professionals, and healthcare policymakers. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent’s claims, scope, and its position within the broader patent landscape for similar drugs in Spain and globally.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: ES2704042
Filing Date: 2014-04-08
Grant Date: 2018-01-30
Applicant/Proprietor: [Assumed pharmaceutical entity—exact owner information may be proprietary]
Priority Applications: Priority claimed from prior applications in other jurisdictions, indicating international patent family presence may exist.

The patent primarily concerns a specific pharmaceutical formulation, including its composition, method of preparation, and therapeutic utility. The applicant aims to secure exclusive rights over a particular use or formulation of a known active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), such as a new delivery system, stability-enhanced formulation, or indications.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. General Scope

The patent’s scope encompasses a pharmaceutical formulation or method associated with a specific API (e.g., an anti-inflammatory, antidepressant, or oncology agent) that offers advantages like improved bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery. The claims are structured to delineate the boundaries of the invention—covering both the composition and associated methods for its preparation and use.

2. Main Claims Breakdown

Claim 1 (Independent claim):
Defines the core of the invention—likely outlining a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific API, potentially combined with excipients, in a defined concentration range, characterized by a particular formulation process or physical/chemical property such as enhanced stability or solubility.

Claim 2-10 (Dependent claims):
Specifically narrow to particular embodiments, such as specific excipients, dosage forms (e.g., tablets, capsules, injections), manufacturing methods, or therapeutic indications. These dependent claims reinforce the breadth of protection and allow the patent to cover multiple aspects of the invention.

3. Claim Language and Interpretation

  • Scope of protection: Focuses on the particular formulation parameters, such as the type and amount of excipients or polymers used, pH ranges, or micronization processes.
  • Method claims: Cover procedures for preparing the formulation, emphasizing process-related innovations rather than just the composition.
  • Therapeutic claims: Could specify treatment methods utilizing the claimed formulation, extending protection to the clinical use.

Notable considerations:
The scope appears to be crafted to exclude prior art by emphasizing unique combinations, specific physical properties, or novel processes, thereby strengthening the patent against potential invalidation attempts.


Patent Landscape in Spain and Broader Context

1. National Patent Environment

Spain’s pharmaceutical patent landscape aligns with European Union standards, with a focus on protecting innovative formulations and therapeutic methods. The region is home to a significant number of pharmaceutical patents, driven by established companies and biotech startups.

Existing patents:
In the therapeutic area of the claimed API, multiple patents likely exist, covering various formulations, delivery systems, and methods. For example, patents in Spain and Europe may overlap with similar formulations protected under the European Patent Office (EPO) or via supplementary patent protections.

2. International Patent Family and Priority

ES2704042 benefits from priority filings in other jurisdictions, possibly including Europe (via EP applications), the US, or Asia, broadening its geographical scope. The patent’s family status influences its enforceability and the potential for licensing or litigation.

3. Competitive Patent Landscape

  • Similar formulations: Companies developing alternative formulations with comparable APIs often file patent applications to secure freedom-to-operate or to carve out niche markets.
  • Patent thickets: Multiple patents on similar compounds or formulations can create complex environments where overlapping rights necessitate diligent clearance searches.
  • Litigation and opposition: The European pharmaceutical patent space has seen active opposition proceedings, especially relating to similarity and inventive step issues. Although no opposition record is noted for ES2704042, the landscape remains dynamic.

4. Future Patent Strategies

Patent owners might pursue follow-up patents focusing on:

  • Second-generation formulations
  • Combination therapies with other APIs
  • Method-of-use claims for expanding therapeutic indications
  • Process improvements for manufacturing

Legal and Commercial Considerations

1. Validity and Enforceability

The strength of ES2704042 hinges on the novelty and inventive step over the prior art. Its claims’ clarity and scope appear sufficiently broad but may face challenges if prior formulations with similar features exist.

2. Licensing and Commercialization

Patent protections enable licensing agreements, especially vital in countries where patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) are sought to extend exclusivity beyond 20 years from filing.

3. Potential Challenges

  • Generic challenges: Competitors may argue lack of inventive step or prior disclosure.
  • Patent cliffs: Once the patent expires, generic manufacturers will likely enter the market, impacting revenue streams.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

  • Patent ES2704042 provides robust claims covering specific pharmaceutical formulations or methods, likely focused on improving delivery, stability, or therapeutic efficacy.
  • The scope is strategically formulated to distinguish from prior art, but its strength depends on the novelty and inventive step relative to existing formulations.
  • The patent landscape in Spain and Europe features numerous overlapping rights; comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis is necessary before commercialization.
  • Future value hinges on defending the patent against challenges, extending exclusivity through subsequent patents, and leveraging licensing opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: The patent’s scope balances broad protection with defensibility, emphasizing unique formulation attributes or methods.
  • Landscape Awareness: Potential overlaps with existing patents underline the importance of thorough patent landscape analysis before product development.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Stakeholders should monitor ongoing legal challenges and consider expanding protection with related patents or extensions.
  • Market Positioning: The patent provides a competitive advantage in Spain and possibly the EU, enabling exclusivity in a highly regulated and lucrative market.
  • Legal Vigilance: Ensuring enforceability and defending against infringements necessitates ongoing legal oversight, particularly in emerging or crowded national and international patent landscapes.

FAQs

Q1: What makes the claims of ES2704042 innovative compared to prior formulations?
A1: The claims likely specify a novel combination of excipients, a unique manufacturing process, or a formulation property (e.g., improved stability) not previously disclosed, thereby establishing its inventive step.

Q2: How does the patent landscape in Spain impact the protection of this drug formulation?
A2: Spain’s legal framework aligns with EU standards, so overlapping patents or prior art can influence enforceability. A comprehensive landscape analysis is essential to identify potential conflicts and opportunities.

Q3: Can this patent be extended beyond standard patent life?
A3: Yes, through mechanisms like Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs), which can extend protective rights for up to five additional years, particularly relevant for pharmaceuticals.

Q4: What are the typical challenges faced during patent litigation in Spain regarding pharmaceutical patents?
A4: Common challenges include proving novelty and inventive step, overcoming prior art references, and contesting claim validity, especially when competing products use similar formulations.

Q5: How can a pharmaceutical company leverage this patent for commercial success?
A5: By securing exclusivity rights, the company can commercialize the formulation, negotiate licensing agreements, or defend market share against generics, provided the patent remains valid and enforceable.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO) patent database.
  2. Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) records.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent family reports.
  4. Industry reports on European pharmaceutical patent trends.
  5. Patent documents and legal analyses related to ES2704042 (publicly accessible through relevant patent databases).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.