You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1125501


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1125501

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,645,459 Jan 9, 2028 Apil ATELVIA risedronate sodium
8,246,989 Jan 16, 2026 Apil ATELVIA risedronate sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY1125501

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent CY1125501, granted in Cyprus, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention whose scope, claims, and landscape are critical for understanding its market position, enforceability, and potential for commercialization. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, delves into its scope, assesses its legal robustness within the broader patent environment, and evaluates relevant patent landscape considerations reflecting its strategic positioning.


Patent Overview and Status

The patent number CY1125501 was granted in Cyprus, a jurisdiction notable for its strategic location in the Mediterranean and membership in the European Patent Convention (EPC). While Cyprus grants patents with effect similar to national rights, the patent's primary claims remain pivotal in defining the monopoly's bounds. The patent’s filing date, grant date, and expiration date (anticipated 20 years from priority, generally around 2032) influence its scope and enforceability.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Classification and Underlying Technology

The invention classified under specific International Patent Classification (IPC) codes—likely within the pharmaceutical or chemical classes—signals its technological domain. Typically, patents for drugs involve chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of use.

This patent is presumed to claim a particular chemical entity or a pharmaceutical composition, or perhaps a novel method of treatment—though precise classification details are unavailable here. Identifying the specific classification would enable comparison with existing patents.

2. Claims Analysis

Patent claims define the legal boundaries of the invention, with independent claims widening the scope and dependent claims adding specificity. The following are typical types of claims in drug patents:

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or compositions.
  • Use Claims: Cover novel therapeutic methods or indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical formulations.
  • Process Claims: Cover methods of synthesis or manufacturing.

Without directly viewing CY1125501's claims, an inference suggests it likely contains:

  • Independent claim(s): possibly claiming a novel chemical compound or a pharmaceutical composition.
  • Dependent claim(s): likely elaborating on specific aspects such as salts, formulations, or methods of use.

Important considerations:

  • Nova or Novelty: The claims probably specify structural features of a compound not disclosed previously, aiming to secure novelty.
  • Inventive Step: The claims' scope must demonstrate sufficient inventive step over prior art, which affects enforceability.
  • Broad vs. Narrow Claims: Broader claims increase market exclusivity but are harder to defend; narrow claims are more strategically limited.

3. Patent Claims Specificity and Potential Limitations

The scope’s breadth directly influences patent strength and freedom-to-operate assessments:

  • Broad claims encompassing a class of compounds/uses may face challenges from prior art.
  • Narrow claims focus on specific molecules or methods, reducing infringement risk, but may allow competitors to design around the patent.

If the claims articulate a specific chemical structure with particular substituents (e.g., a novel heterocyclic core), the scope narrows but increases robustness.

4. Legal and Technical Robustness of Claims

Robust patents should have clear, enabling claims with supported descriptions. For CY1125501:

  • Adequate disclosure ensures the claims are supported, reducing invalidity risk.
  • The claims’ dependency on detailed structural or procedural features can prevent design-arounds.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Patent Families

The drug landscape likely includes numerous patents; understanding CY1125501’s position involves:

  • Search for similar chemical entities or classes in patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, WIPO).
  • Overlay with existing patent families, especially from key competitors or inventors.

Potential overlaps may exist with patents on similar molecules or therapeutic methods, influencing commercial viability and licensing.

2. Expiry, Exclusivity, and Market Landscape

  • Patent expiry: Expected around 2032 unless extension mechanisms apply.
  • Data exclusivity: For innovative pharmaceuticals, data exclusivity often limits generic entry, possibly more restrictive than patent rights.
  • Supplementary protection certificates (SPCs): EU context may provide additional exclusivity, depending on the active ingredient.

3. Geographic Relevance

While the patent is Cyprus-specific, its strategic importance extends via:

  • European Patent Convention (EPC): Cyprus patents can serve as a basis for European extensions.
  • International filings: If filed via PCT, the patent landscape may encompass multiple jurisdictions, affecting global market strategies.

4. Competitor and Litigation Landscape

  • Examination of recent patent litigations or oppositions in similar classes indicates potential risks.
  • Patent thickets in the relevant therapeutic area could complicate commercialization.

Strategic Implications for Patent Holders and Stakeholders

The scope of patent CY1125501 suggests a targeted but potentially defensible position, assuming well-drafted claims. Developers and licensees should consider:

  • Freedom-to-operate: Analyzing overlapping patents.
  • Patent enforcement: Building robust infringement strategies.
  • Innovation pipeline: Leveraging overlapping patents or pursuing improvements to extend protection.

Conclusions and Outlook

The scope of CY1125501 is presumed to cover specific chemical compounds or formulations, with claims carefully articulated to balance breadth and enforceability. Its positioning within the patent landscape depends heavily on the prior art base, particularly in the targeted therapeutic class.

Given the strategic significance of Cyprus and potential European patent extensions, the patent provides a foundational exclusivity period that can be leveraged for commercial advantage. However, the densely populated pharmaceutical patent space necessitates continuous monitoring of competing patents, non-obviousness considerations, and potential patent challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: Clear, well-supported claims focusing on specific compounds or methods strengthen patent defensibility, whereas overly broad claims risk invalidation.
  • Patent Landscape Position: CY1125501 likely occupies a strategic niche; assessing overlaps with prior art is necessary to gauge freedom-to-operate.
  • Enforceability and Market Exclusivity: The patent's enforceability depends on claim clarity, prior art considerations, and jurisdictional extensions.
  • Innovation Opportunities: Continual innovation and incremental improvements can extend protection beyond the original patent life.
  • Global Strategy: Leveraging Cyprus patents within broader European and international frameworks enhances market access and competitive positioning.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical lifespan of a drug patent like CY1125501 in Cyprus?
A1: Generally, pharmaceutical patents are granted for 20 years from the filing date, subject to possible extensions such as supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) that can add up to five additional years, extending exclusivity.

Q2: How does the scope of claims influence patent enforceability in pharmaceuticals?
A2: Broader claims can provide extensive protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges. Narrow, well-supported claims reduce infringement ambiguity but may offer limited coverage, making enforcement more straightforward.

Q3: What are common challenges faced by patents like CY1125501 in the pharmaceutical landscape?
A3: Challenges include prior art invalidation, patent cliffs upon expiry, patent infringement scrutiny, and competition from generics or biosimilars where applicable.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact commercial drug development?
A4: A well-mapped patent landscape helps in avoiding infringement, identifying licensing opportunities, and planning portfolio strategies to maximize market exclusivity.

Q5: Can CY1125501 be extended or maintained beyond its original expiry date?
A5: While the patent itself cannot be extended, supplementary measures such as SPCs or data exclusivity in specific jurisdictions can prolong market protection beyond standard patent terms.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO): Patent classification and claims analysis tools.
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports (PLRs): Pharmaceutical patents overview.
  3. Cyprus Patent Office: Patent rules, durations, and extensions.
  4. Global Innovation Index reports: Patent landscape and strategy insights.
  5. European Medicines Agency (EMA): Patent and market exclusivity parameters.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.