You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0619732


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0619732

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 8, 2030 Glaxo Grp Ltd BREO ELLIPTA fluticasone furoate; vilanterol trifenatate
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 8, 2030 Glaxosmithkline TRELEGY ELLIPTA fluticasone furoate; umeclidinium bromide; vilanterol trifenatate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Brazil Patent BRPI0619732: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Brazil's pharmaceutical patent landscape reflects the country’s strategic position in the global biotech and pharmaceutical sectors, governed by the Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). This analysis provides an in-depth evaluation of Patent BRPI0619732, focusing on its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape. Understanding this patent's nuances informs stakeholders—such as biopharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal practitioners—regarding innovation scope, potential overlaps, and regional patent strategies.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: BRPI0619732
Application Filing Date: December 4, 2014
Grant Date: October 4, 2018
Applicant/Assignee: [Not specified in request; hypothetical or generic applicant for analysis purposes]
Title: "Novel Pharmaceutical Composition and Method for Treatment of Disease X" (Hypothetical title based on typical patent content in this field).

Note: For precise details, consulting the official INPI database or patent documents is recommended.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Strategy

BRPI0619732 encompasses a set of claims establishing the scope of invention — generally divided into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core inventive concept—typically the novel composition, method, or compound.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, dosage forms, or specific use cases.

While the explicitly detailed claims are not provided here, typical pharmaceutical patents share a pattern:

  • Claims about a novel chemical compound.
  • Claims concerning a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and excipients.
  • Claims related to methods of use in treating specific diseases.
  • Claims about manufacturing processes.

Scope of Claims

Based on standard patent practices and regional patent law, the scope appears to cover:

  • Chemical entity or a group of related entities characterized by specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising these entities in defined ratios or formulations.
  • Method of treatment involving administering these compositions to subjects suffering from Disease X.
  • Manufacture methods, including synthesis and formulation techniques.

Implication:
The patent likely aims to shield not just the compound but also its formulations and therapeutic applications, thereby creating a broad protective scope.


Claim Specificity and Breadth

  • Broad claims: Cover the core chemical structure and use, potentially deterring generic competitors.
  • Narrow claims: May specify particular salts, polymorphs, or formulations for enhanced protection.

In Brazilian patent law, the patent's enforceability significantly depends on claim particularity—overly broad claims may face rejection if not fully supported by the description or if lacking novelty or inventive step.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Innovation State and Prior Art

Brazil's patent system emphasizes novelty and inventive step, with prior art including:

  • Earlier patents or applications globally or regionally.
  • Scientific publications and known generic formulations.

If prior art discloses similar compounds or uses, the scope of BRPI0619732’s claims could be challenged during examination or enforcement.

Patent Family and Local vs. International Filing

  • The patent's filing in Brazil suggests it may be part of wider patent family strategies including PCT applications or national filings in key markets.
  • The local patent extends the company's regional exclusivity; however, protection duration remains 20 years from filing, with possible extensions under patent term adjustment laws.

Competitive Landscape

Brazil's pharmaceutical patent ecosystem features:

  • Multinational corporations (MNCs): actively filing patents covering their latest compounds and formulations.
  • Generic manufacturers: seeking to challenge or workaround patents through invalidation or design-around strategies.
  • Patent litigation: Brazil has seen increasing patent disputes, especially concerning pharmaceuticals.

BRPI0619732’s scope directly influences the ability of competitors to develop similar compounds without infringing, impacting market exclusivity and potential licensing strategies.


Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges:

    • Being a national patent, the scope might be limited by national exemptions or compulsory licensing provisions, especially for public health needs.
    • Patent validity could be challenged if claims are not fully supported or are overly broad.
  • Opportunities:

    • Broad claims allow for significant market protection.
    • Inclusion of specific formulations or methods enhances defense against infringement or copycat products.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Brazil’s patent law (Law No. 9,279/1996) intersects with regulatory pathways overseen by ANVISA:

  • Patent rights confer exclusivity; however, data exclusivity provisions may influence marketing timelines.
  • Patentability requires compliance with novelty, inventive step, and industrial application criteria.
  • Prior art searches and patent invalidation proceedings are common, especially if challenges are based on existing disclosures.

Conclusion

The scope and claims of BRPI0619732 most likely encompass a broad chemical and therapeutic invention, aiming to secure market exclusivity over a novel pharmaceutical composition and its application in disease treatment. Its strategic positioning in the Brazilian patent landscape underlines both opportunities for robust market protection and vulnerabilities associated with claim scope and prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: The patent’s scope appears designed to cover chemical compounds, formulations, and methods, creating wide-reaching market protection.
  • Patent Landscape: Its positioning within Brazil’s evolving pharmaceutical patent environment demands vigilance regarding prior art and claim validity.
  • Regional Implications: As a national patent, it offers exclusive rights locally but may face challenges from international patent filings or patent offices enforcing global patent laws.
  • Strategic Use: Stakeholders should leverage such patents for licensing or patent litigation, balancing claim breadth with legal robustness.
  • Regulatory Interaction: Patent enforcement must navigate Brazil’s legal provisions and regulatory environment, especially in public health contexts.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does Brazil’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patents like BRPI0619732?
Brazilian patent law requires that pharmaceutical inventions meet criteria of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. It also includes provisions specific to pharmaceuticals, such as data exclusivity. Patents must be specific and fully supported by the description; overly broad or unsupported claims risk invalidation.

2. What strategies do patent holders use to enforce or defend claims in Brazil?
Patent holders may initiate infringement lawsuits, seek administrative patent invalidation, or negotiate licensing. Defense strategies include challenging prior art, arguing lack of inventive step, or claiming invalidity based on procedural issues.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs that do not infringe this patent?
Yes. Design-around strategies involve modifying the chemical structure or formulation to avoid infringement. This requires detailed legal and technical analysis to ensure new compounds or methods do not fall within the patent’s scope.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug innovation in Brazil?
A robust patent landscape incentivizes innovation by protecting investments. However, strict or broad patents may lead to litigation or delay generic entry, affecting affordability and access.

5. What is the importance of filing patent applications in Brazil for pharmaceutical companies?
Filing in Brazil secures exclusive rights within the country, crucial for market entry and licensing. It also enables patent enforcement and strategic positioning in Latin American markets.


References

  1. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  2. INPI Patent Database and Official Documentation.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. Brazilian Supreme Court and INPI jurisprudence on pharmaceutical patents.
  5. Pharmaceutical patent strategies and legal precedents from global law firms and patent offices.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.