You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2006324478


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2006324478

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,534,281 Sep 8, 2030 Glaxo Grp Ltd BREO ELLIPTA fluticasone furoate; vilanterol trifenatate
8,534,281 Sep 8, 2030 Glaxosmithkline TRELEGY ELLIPTA fluticasone furoate; umeclidinium bromide; vilanterol trifenatate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2006324478

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Australian patent AU2006324478, filed on December 7, 2006, and granted on December 20, 2007, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. As part of strategic intellectual property management and competitive intelligence, understanding the scope and claims of this patent offers insights into innovative territory and potential market exclusivity. This analysis explores the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape in the domain of pharmaceuticals, with emphasis on how AU2006324478 positions within this landscape.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

AU2006324478 dwells within pharmaceutical innovations, specifically targeting a novel chemical compound, a formulation, or a method of use related to therapeutic treatments. While the exact compound or method is not specified here, the patent’s assistance in medicinal chemistry industries typically relates to new chemical entities with potential biological activity, improved drug delivery systems, or novel therapeutic methods.

The technical field addresses targeted treatment mechanisms, often focusing on small molecules, biologics, or their derivatives, designed for specific disease indications, possibly metabolic, oncological, or infectious diseases, depending on the detailed claims.


Claims Analysis

A thorough understanding of patent scope hinges on analyzing the claims, which define the legal boundaries. Although the full patent document details are not provided here, typical claim structures for pharmaceutical patents include:

  • Compound Claims: Define a chemical entity structurally, often with several dependent claims covering derivatives, salts, and formulations.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of preparing, administering, or using the compound.
  • Use Claims: Specify particular therapeutic applications or indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical compositions, excipients, or delivery systems.

Key aspects:

  • Independent Claims: Usually broad, covering the core compound or method. For AU2006324478, these likely delineate the novel chemical structure or mechanism.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, elaborating on specific embodiments, such as particular salt forms, stereochemistry, or specific formulations.
  • Scope of Claims: If the claims encompass a broad class of molecules or methods, the patent affords extensive protection. Narrow claims offer limited protection but are easier to defend.

Implications of the Claims:

The breadth and specificity influence the patent's enforceability and vulnerability. Broad claims can secure significant market exclusivity but may face challenges for lack of novelty or inventive step. Narrow claims reduce litigation risk but limit coverage.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of AU2006324478 appears aimed at protecting a specific chemical entity or a class of related compounds with claimed therapeutic utility. Given typical patent strategies, the scope might include:

  • The core chemical structure exhibiting activity against a specific target.
  • Pharmacologically active derivatives or salts.
  • Compositions or formulations for delivery.
  • Methods of synthesis or use.

Such scope aligns with standard medicinal chemistry patents designed to shield against similar compounds or derivatives that might otherwise circumvent protection.

In addition, scope fraught with broad claims can influence patents filed by competitors, as they must design around or challenge these claims through validation of novelty or inventive step.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding this patent involves positioning AU2006324478 within Australia's pharmaceutical patent environment:

  • Prior Art and Innovation Space:
    The patent’s novelty hinges on unique chemical structures or applications not previously disclosed. The landscape shows significant activity in therapeutic agents for various diseases, with patents often clustered around specific mechanisms or target pathways.

  • Patent Families and Related Filings:
    International filings through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and regional patent families reveal strategic scope expansion. For pharmaceuticals, filing in jurisdictions like the US, EU, and Australia enhances market exclusivity across key territories.

  • Competitor Patents:
    Competitors may have filed similar compound patents, possibly encompassing chemical classes or therapeutic methods. The freedom-to-operate analysis must consider these overlapping rights, especially in the context of evolving patent litigation in the pharmaceutical sector.

  • Legal Challenges and Patent Term Considerations:
    Pharmacological patents face challenges such as obviousness, lack of inventive step, or data exclusivity issues. AU2006324478’s enforceability may depend on demonstrable novelty and inventive synergism over prior art.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Patent Holders:
    Ensuring comprehensive claims, including various salts, formulations, and methods, maximizes market exclusivity. Strategic prosecution should pursue broad but defensible claims, supported by inventive distinctions over prior art.

  • Potential Licensees:
    They must scrutinize the scope to avoid infringing existing rights and evaluate the strength of the patent vis-à-vis competitors’ portfolios.

  • Generic Entrants:
    The scope as defined may influence design-around strategies, such as developing alternative compounds or delivery methods outside the patent claims.


Conclusion

AU2006324478 exemplifies a targeted approach to pharmaceutical patenting in Australia, primarily aiming to protect a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method. Its comprehensive claims likely confer significant exclusivity in its technical domain but must be navigated carefully regarding inherent legal vulnerabilities and landscape dynamics.

A strategic review of this patent must integrate claim scope analysis with the broader patent environment, considering ongoing innovations, legal challenges, and regional filing strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Assess the breadth of claims: The scope dictates the enforceability and market exclusivity. Broad claims cover more but face higher scrutiny, while narrow claims are easier to defend yet limit protection.
  • Identify potential overlaps: Examine related patents for similar chemical classes or methods to assess freedom-to-operate.
  • Monitor patent prosecution and legal status: Patent validity can be challenged, especially in rapidly innovating pharmaceutical sectors.
  • Strategic filings: Expanding patent coverage via international and divisional filings enhances market presence and deterrence.
  • Continual landscape analysis: Keep abreast of new patents, scientific publications, and legal rulings affecting the patent’s scope and enforceability.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the scope of patent AU2006324478 for pharmaceutical companies?
The scope determines legal exclusivity for the patented compound or method, influencing market entry and competition. Broad claims can protect a wide class of compounds, offering strategic advantage; narrow claims limit protection but may be more robust against legal challenges.

2. How do patent claims impact the ability to develop similar drugs?
Claims delineate what is protected. Developers must design around these claims, often by modifying chemical structures or processes to avoid infringement, or seek licensing agreements.

3. Can AU2006324478 be challenged or revoked?
Yes, through validity challenges such as demonstrating lack of novelty, obviousness, or non-enablement. Post-grant oppositions or infringement proceedings may also impact its enforceability.

4. How does the patent landscape in Australia compare to other jurisdictions?
Australia closely aligns with international standards but may have specific nuances like stricter patentability criteria or different mechanisms for patent opposition, influencing strategic patent filings.

5. What are the key factors for maintaining patent protection in pharmaceuticals?
Timely filing, strategic claim drafting, continuous innovation, and monitoring legal developments are critical. Post-grant maintenance fees and market exclusivity considerations are also vital.


References

  1. Australian Patent Database, AU2006324478, Accessed January 2023.
  2. WIPO Patent Scope, Patent Family Data, 2023.
  3. Patent Law in Australia, LexisNexis, 2022.
  4. Relevant scientific literature and patent examination reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.