You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

METHYCLOTHIAZIDE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for METHYCLOTHIAZIDE
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for METHYCLOTHIAZIDE
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for METHYCLOTHIAZIDE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for METHYCLOTHIAZIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Medpointe Pharm Hlc DIUTENSEN-R methyclothiazide; reserpine TABLET;ORAL 012708-005 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Par Pharm METHYCLOTHIAZIDE methyclothiazide TABLET;ORAL 089136-001 Feb 12, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Abbvie ENDURON methyclothiazide TABLET;ORAL 012524-004 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Chartwell Rx METHYCLOTHIAZIDE methyclothiazide TABLET;ORAL 089835-001 Aug 18, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Watson Labs METHYCLOTHIAZIDE methyclothiazide TABLET;ORAL 085476-001 Mar 11, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Watson Labs METHYCLOTHIAZIDE methyclothiazide TABLET;ORAL 088724-001 Sep 6, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Methyclothiazide

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Methyclothiazide (MCTZ) is a thiazide diuretic primarily prescribed for hypertension management and edema. Though it shares pharmacological similarities with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), its clinical use remains relatively niche. The pharmaceutical landscape's evolution, driven by changing regulatory policies, emerging generics, and shifting treatment guidelines, shapes the drug’s market trajectory. This report analyzes key market forces, patent considerations, competitive landscape, and financial prospects pertaining to methyclothiazide.


Pharmacological Profile and Current Market Position

Methyclothiazide, classified under thiazide diuretics, acts on sodium-chloride symporters in the distal convoluted tubule, promoting diuresis and reduction of blood pressure. Its efficacy parallels other thiazides, but it's less commonly favored due to limited marketed formulations and availability.

The drug historically targeted hypertension, but recent market trends inclined towards more potent or newer class agents like ACE inhibitors and ARBs, diminishing the demand for traditional thiazides recently. However, methyclothiazide retains niche appeal owing to its low-cost profile and established safety in specific patient subsets.


Market Dynamics Analysis

1. Regulatory Environment and Patent Landscape

Methyclothiazide's patent status significantly influences market dynamics. As a generic with no recent patent protections, it faces limited exclusivity. The expiration of any initial patents, coupled with a lack of new formulations, constrains its market presence. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA do not currently prioritize initiatives specific to methyclothiazide, focusing instead on newer agents with enhanced efficacy or safety profiles.

2. Competition and Market Share

The primary competitors are other thiazide diuretics, including hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and indapamide. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), with a well-established market, dominates due to longer regulatory history and widespread prescribing habits.

Methyclothiazide's market share remains minimal, estimated at less than 1% globally. Its utilization is often confined to compounding pharmacies, specific hospital protocols, or regions where formulary restrictions favor older, generic agents.

3. Clinical Guidelines and Prescribing Trends

Recent hypertension management guidelines, such as those from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), advocate for evidence-based first-line agents, often favoring ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or calcium channel blockers over traditional thiazides. Nonetheless, thiazides are still recommended as cost-effective options, which sustains some demand.

4. Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Cost-effectiveness relative to newer agents.
  • Established safety profile.
  • Use in specific patient populations with contraindications to other therapies.

Barriers:

  • Limited clinical differentiation from competitors.
  • Declining prescribing trends favoring newer drugs.
  • Lack of patent protection and R&D investments reducing market pull.
  • Evolution toward combination therapies, often with newer agents.

Financial Trajectory Analysis

1. Revenue Projections

Given its minimal market share (~<1%), annual revenues for methyclothiazide are modest. In markets like the U.S., where generic drugs account for approximately 90% of prescriptions, the impact of such niche drugs remains limited. Current revenue streams are estimated in the low tens of millions USD per annum globally, with significant variation based on regional prescribing practices.

2. Cost Structure and Margins

Manufacturing costs are low for established generic diuretics, leading to thin profit margins. Price erosion driven by intense generic competition further compresses profitability. Margins typically hover around single digits, with some manufacturers strategically reducing prices to maintain market share.

3. Impact of Patent Expiry and Generics

The absence of patent protection expels potential for premium pricing. The proliferation of generics following patent expirations drives prices downward, often by 80-90% within a few years. Consequently, financial prospects hinge on sustaining minimal operating costs and capturing niche markets where alternatives are limited.

4. Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities:

  • Repurposing or reformulating methyclothiazide for new indications.
  • Targeting specific underserved populations through strategic marketing.
  • Leveraging low-cost manufacturing to maintain profitability in niche segments.

Risks:

  • Competition from highly effective, newer drugs.
  • Regulatory shifts favoring innovative therapies.
  • Market decline due to changing clinical guidelines or health policy preferences.

Future Outlook

The future of methyclothiazide hinges on macro health trends, regulatory shifts, and generic lifecycle progression. Given the current landscape, its market is projected to decline gradually unless novel clinical applications emerge or it is incorporated into combination therapies with a measurable efficacy advantage.

Potential growth avenues involve biosimilar development, off-label uses, or specialized formulations, but these require significant R&D investment with uncertain returns. The overall financial trajectory remains subdued, with marginal revenues and tight margins expected over the next decade.


Conclusion

Methyclothiazide's market dynamics reflect the broader challenges faced by traditional diuretics in an evolving therapeutic environment prioritizing newer, targeted agents. The decline in patent protection, high generic competition, and shifting prescribing behaviors diminish its revenue potential. Nonetheless, its cost-effective profile sustains a niche market segment, particularly in regions where cost constraints dominate treatment decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Share: Marginal, with less than 1% global utilization, primarily driven by cost considerations.
  • Revenue Outlook: Static or declining, constrained by intense generic competition and evolving clinical guidelines.
  • Competitive Landscape: Dominated by hydrochlorothiazide and other newer diuretics; methyclothiazide occupies a niche.
  • Financial Viability: Slim margins due to price erosion; limited R&D investment and innovation.
  • Growth Opportunities: Limited but may include niche applications or reformulations; high risk and uncertain ROI.

FAQs

Q1: What factors limit the growth of methyclothiazide in current markets?
A1: Limited clinical differentiation, regrowth of newer antihypertensive agents, loss of patent protections, and shifting treatment guidelines favoring alternative therapies reduce its market expansion prospects.

Q2: Can methyclothiazide benefit from formulation innovations?
A2: Potentially, reformulation for improved bioavailability or combination therapy could offer competitive advantages, but such innovations entail significant R&D costs with uncertain market gains.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence methyclothiazide’s market?
A3: Lack of recent patents leads to numerous generic competitors, resulting in price competition and compressed profit margins, thereby limiting its financial viability.

Q4: Are there specific regions where methyclothiazide maintains higher market share?
A4: Yes, in some developing countries and regions with formulary restrictions favoring older, low-cost medications, methyclothiazide's usage persists but remains comparatively small.

Q5: What strategic moves could extend methyclothiazide’s market viability?
A5: Focus on niche indications, cost-effective manufacturing, or integration into multi-drug regimens with proven efficacy may sustain its relevance, albeit marginally.


References

  1. Bloomberg Industry Data: Trends in generic drug markets and price erosion.
  2. FDA Drug Approvals and Approvals Database: Current status and patent timelines of thiazide diuretics.
  3. Clinical Practice Guidelines (AAH/ACC): Recommendations on antihypertensive therapy.
  4. IMS Health Reports: Prescription trends and market share statistics for diuretics.
  5. Pharmaceutical R&D Investment Reports: Insights into innovation strategies for older drug classes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.